Fothergill Annette W, McCarthy Dora I, Albataineh Mohammad T, Sanders Carmita, McElmeel Maria, Wiederhold Nathan P
Fungus Testing Laboratory, Department of Pathology and South Texas Reference Laboratories, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Fungus Testing Laboratory, Department of Pathology and South Texas Reference Laboratories, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Mar;54(3):734-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02659-15. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Significant interlaboratory variability is observed in testing the caspofungin susceptibility of Candida species by both the CLSI and EUCAST broth microdilution methodologies. We evaluated the influence of treated versus untreated polystyrene microtiter trays on caspofungin MICs using 209 isolates of four Candida species, including 16 C. albicans and 11 C. glabrata isolates with defined FKS mutations. Caspofungin MICs were also determined using the commercially available YeastOne and Etest assays and 102 isolates. All C. glabrata isolates had caspofungin MICs of ≥0.5 μg/ml, the clinical breakpoint for caspofungin resistance in this species, measured using trays made of treated polystyrene, regardless of the FKS status. In contrast, susceptible isolates could readily be distinguished from resistant/non-wild-type isolates when caspofungin MICs were measured using untreated polystyrene trays and both the YeastOne and Etest assays. Similar results were also observed for C. krusei isolates, as all isolates had caspofungin MICs above the threshold for resistance measured using treated polystyrene trays. In contrast, C. albicans isolates could be correctly identified as susceptible or resistant when caspofungin MICs were measured with treated or untreated trays and with the YeastOne and Etest assays. MICs falsely elevated above the resistance breakpoint were also not observed for C. tropicalis isolates. These results demonstrated that the use of treated polystyrene may be one factor that leads to falsely elevated caspofungin in vitro susceptibility results and that this may also be a greater issue for some Candida species than for others.
通过CLSI和EUCAST肉汤微量稀释法检测念珠菌属对卡泊芬净的敏感性时,各实验室间存在显著差异。我们使用四种念珠菌的209株分离株评估了经处理和未经处理的聚苯乙烯微量滴定板对卡泊芬净最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的影响,其中包括16株白色念珠菌和11株具有明确FKS突变的光滑念珠菌分离株。还使用市售的YeastOne和Etest法对102株分离株测定了卡泊芬净的MIC。所有光滑念珠菌分离株使用经处理的聚苯乙烯制成的滴定板测量时,其卡泊芬净MIC均≥0.5μg/ml,这是该菌种对卡泊芬净耐药的临床界值,与FKS状态无关。相比之下,当使用未经处理的聚苯乙烯滴定板以及YeastOne和Etest法测量卡泊芬净MIC时,敏感分离株能够很容易地与耐药/非野生型分离株区分开来。克鲁斯念珠菌分离株也观察到了类似结果,因为所有分离株使用经处理的聚苯乙烯滴定板测量时,其卡泊芬净MIC均高于耐药阈值。相比之下,当使用经处理或未经处理的滴定板以及YeastOne和Etest法测量卡泊芬净MIC时,白色念珠菌分离株能够被正确鉴定为敏感或耐药。热带念珠菌分离株也未观察到MIC错误地升高至耐药界值以上的情况。这些结果表明,使用经处理的聚苯乙烯可能是导致卡泊芬净体外药敏结果错误升高的一个因素,而且对于某些念珠菌种而言,这一问题可能比其他菌种更为严重。