Ojajärvi J, Mäkelä P, Rantasalo I
J Hyg (Lond). 1977 Aug;79(1):107-19. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400052906.
In a prolonged field trial a 4% chlorhexidine digluconate detergent scrub (Hibiscrub(R)), that had earlier proved to be an effective hand disinfectant, was studied in hospital wards. Finger tips were found to harbour more bacteria than the hand dorsum and the samples collected from them yielded more information on the bacteriological and dermatological effects of hand disinfectants in practice.In wards with a relatively low hand-washing frequency (less than 20 times in 8 hours) the bacteriological results resembled those obtained by in-use tests with volunteers. In the neonatal unit where the hand washing frequency was remarkably high, even occasionally over 100 times/8 h shift, an increase in the bacterial colony counts of the majority of the staff was recorded both before and after hand washing already after using the preparation for 1 week. Age, occupation and hand-washing frequency all correlated with the bacteriological results. Twenty-seven out of 37 persons complained of side effects such as wounds of finger tips and redness or heavy drying of the skin. Wounds, particularly on finger tips, resulted in the failure of disinfection. An increase in bacterial counts was sometimes noted without any dermatological or subjective changes. Drying of the skin was complained of less often when no increase in skin bacteria occurred.After the changeover of washing practice to a detergent followed by a rinse with spirit solution containing chlorhexidine and glycerol a decrease was recorded in the bacterial counts. It is concluded that more attention should be paid to long-term testing of hand washing and disinfection methods to ensure optimum final results in practice. It is obvious that the knowledge obtained from short time in-use testing cannot be applied to all conditions of use.
在一项长期的现场试验中,对一种4%葡萄糖酸洗必泰洗涤剂擦洗剂( Hibiscrub®)进行了研究,该擦洗剂此前已被证明是一种有效的手部消毒剂。研究在医院病房进行。发现指尖携带的细菌比手背部更多,从指尖采集的样本能提供更多关于手部消毒剂在实际应用中的细菌学和皮肤学效果的信息。在洗手频率相对较低(8小时内少于20次)的病房,细菌学结果与志愿者实际使用测试所得结果相似。在新生儿病房,洗手频率非常高,甚至偶尔超过100次/8小时轮班,在使用该制剂1周后,记录到大多数工作人员洗手前后的细菌菌落数均有所增加。年龄、职业和洗手频率均与细菌学结果相关。37人中有27人抱怨出现副作用,如指尖伤口、皮肤发红或严重干燥。伤口,尤其是指尖的伤口,导致消毒失败。有时会注意到细菌数量增加,但没有任何皮肤学或主观变化。当皮肤细菌没有增加时,皮肤干燥的抱怨较少。在将洗手方法改为先用洗涤剂,然后用含洗必泰和甘油的酒精溶液冲洗后,细菌数量有所下降。得出的结论是,应更加关注洗手和消毒方法的长期测试,以确保在实际应用中获得最佳最终效果。显然,从短期实际使用测试中获得的知识不能应用于所有使用条件。