Murray Elizabeth, Pearson Rebecca, Fernandes Michelle, Santos Iná S, Barros Fernando C, Victora Cesar G, Stein Alan, Matijasevich Alicia
Section of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jul;70(7):704-9. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206222. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
Cross-cohort comparison is an established method for improving causal inference. This study compared 2 cohorts, 1 from a high-income country and another from a middle-income country, to (1) establish whether birth exposures may play a causal role in the development of childhood attention problems; and (2) identify whether confounding structures play a different role in parent-reported attention difficulties compared with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnoses.
Birth exposures included low birth weight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), small head circumference (HC) and preterm birth (PTB)). Outcomes of interest were attention difficulties (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, SDQ) and ADHD (Development and Well-Being Assessment, DAWBA). Associations between exposures and outcomes were compared between 7-year-old children from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the UK (N=6849) and the 2004 Pelotas cohort in Brazil (N=3509).
For attention difficulties (SDQ), the pattern of association with birth exposures was similar between cohorts: following adjustment, attention difficulties were associated with SGA (OR=1.59, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.19) and small HC (OR=1.64, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.41) in ALSPAC and SGA (OR=1.35, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.75) in Pelotas. For ADHD, however, the pattern of association following adjustment differed markedly between cohorts. In ALSPAC, ADHD was associated with LBW (OR=2.29, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.80) and PTB (OR=2.33, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.42). In the Pelotas cohort, however, ADHD was associated with SGA (OR=1.69, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.82).
The findings suggest that fetal growth impairment may play a causal role in the development of attention difficulties in childhood, as similar associations were identified across both cohorts. Confounding structures, however, appear to play a greater role in determining whether a child meets the full diagnostic criteria for ADHD.
队列间比较是一种用于改善因果推断的既定方法。本研究比较了两个队列,一个来自高收入国家,另一个来自中等收入国家,以(1)确定出生时的暴露因素是否可能在儿童期注意力问题的发生中起因果作用;以及(2)确定与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)诊断相比,混杂结构在家长报告的注意力困难中是否发挥不同作用。
出生时的暴露因素包括低出生体重(LBW)、小于胎龄儿(SGA)、小头围(HC)和早产(PTB)。感兴趣的结局是注意力困难(长处和困难问卷,SDQ)和ADHD(发育与幸福评估,DAWBA)。比较了英国阿冯父母与儿童纵向研究(ALSPAC)中7岁儿童(N = 6849)和巴西2004年佩洛塔斯队列(N = 3509)中暴露因素与结局之间的关联。
对于注意力困难(SDQ),队列间与出生时暴露因素的关联模式相似:调整后,ALSPAC中注意力困难与小于胎龄儿(OR = 1.59,95%CI 1.20至2.19)和小头围(OR = 1.64,95%CI 1.11至2.41)相关,佩洛塔斯队列中与小于胎龄儿(OR = 1.35,95%CI 1.04至1.75)相关。然而,对于ADHD,调整后的关联模式在队列间有显著差异。在ALSPAC中,ADHD与低出生体重(OR = 2.29,95%CI 1.09至4.80)和早产(OR = 2.33,95%CI 1.23至4.42)相关。然而,在佩洛塔斯队列中,ADHD与小于胎龄儿(OR = 1.69,95%CI 1.02至2.82)相关。
研究结果表明,胎儿生长受限可能在儿童期注意力困难的发生中起因果作用,因为两个队列中都发现了类似的关联。然而,混杂结构似乎在决定儿童是否符合ADHD的完整诊断标准方面发挥更大作用。