Besemer Sytske, Loeber Rolf, Hinshaw Stephen P, Pardini Dustin A
University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Human Development, 1205 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Oct;44(7):1387-98. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0124-6.
Coercive parent-child interaction models posit that an escalating cycle of negative, bidirectional interchanges influences the development of boys' externalizing problems and caregivers' maladaptive parenting over time. However, longitudinal studies examining this hypothesis have been unable to rule out the possibility that between-individual factors account for bidirectional associations between child externalizing problems and maladaptive parenting. Using a longitudinal sample of boys (N = 503) repeatedly assessed eight times across 6-month intervals in childhood (in a range between 6 and 13 years), the current study is the first to use novel within-individual change (fixed effects) models to examine whether parents tend to increase their use of maladaptive parenting strategies following an increase in their son's externalizing problems, or vice versa. These bidirectional associations were examined using multiple facets of externalizing problems (i.e., interpersonal callousness, conduct and oppositional defiant problems, hyperactivity/impulsivity) and parenting behaviors (i.e., physical punishment, involvement, parent-child communication). Analyses failed to support the notion that when boys increase their typical level of problem behaviors, their parents show an increase in their typical level of maladaptive parenting across the subsequent 6 month period, and vice versa. Instead, across 6-month intervals, within parent-son dyads, changes in maladaptive parenting and child externalizing problems waxed and waned in concert. Fixed effects models to address the topic of bidirectional relations between parent and child behavior are severely underrepresented. We recommend that other researchers who have found significant bidirectional parent-child associations using rank-order change models reexamine their data to determine whether these findings hold when examining changes within parent-child dyads.
强制亲子互动模型认为,负面的双向交流不断升级的循环会随着时间的推移影响男孩外化问题的发展以及照顾者的适应不良养育方式。然而,检验这一假设的纵向研究无法排除个体间因素导致儿童外化问题与适应不良养育方式之间双向关联的可能性。本研究以503名男孩为纵向样本,在童年期(6至13岁)每隔6个月进行8次重复评估,首次使用新颖的个体内变化(固定效应)模型来检验父母是否会在儿子外化问题增加后倾向于增加其适应不良养育策略的使用,反之亦然。使用外化问题的多个方面(即人际冷漠、品行和对立违抗问题、多动/冲动)和养育行为(即身体惩罚、参与度、亲子沟通)来检验这些双向关联。分析结果不支持以下观点:当男孩增加其典型的问题行为水平时,其父母在随后的6个月内会表现出适应不良养育方式的典型水平增加,反之亦然。相反,在6个月的间隔内,在亲子二元组中,适应不良养育方式和儿童外化问题的变化会同步起伏。用于解决亲子行为之间双向关系这一主题的固定效应模型的研究严重不足。我们建议其他使用等级顺序变化模型发现显著亲子双向关联的研究人员重新审视他们的数据,以确定在检验亲子二元组内的变化时这些发现是否成立。