• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用人际环形结构对一般因素进行检验:应用于人际问题量表

Examination of the General Factor with the Interpersonal Circumplex Structure: Application to the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.

作者信息

Tracey T J, Rounds J, Gurtman M

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 1996 Oct 1;31(4):441-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3104_3.

DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr3104_3
PMID:26788593
Abstract

The relation of the general factor of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP, Horowitz, Rosenberg, Baer, Ureno, & Villasenor, 1988) to several response set and personality measures as well its relation to the circumplex structure was examined. The correlation of the IIP general factor to the personality and response measures was examined on a sample of 105 undergraduates. The general factor was significantly related to a symptom severity measure as well as negative affectivity and self-deception, supporting its interpretation in a substantive manner. Subsequently, the circular structure of the IIP was examined as it varied across different levels of the general factor in a sample of 1093 college students. The sample was divided into five relatively equally sized groups on the general factor. At each level, the IIP scales were examined for their circularity and circular variance accounted for to determine if the structure of the IIP scales resembled a cylinder, a sphere, or a truncated cone. Evaluations of both the circular order model and the circumplex model supported the circularity of the IIP at all levels of the general factor. Support for the cone structure was supported for lower levels of the general distress factor but higher levels did not demonstrate the expected increased correlational dispersion.

摘要

人际问题量表(IIP,霍洛维茨、罗森伯格、贝尔、乌雷诺和维拉塞诺,1988)的一般因素与几种反应定势和人格测量指标的关系,以及它与环形结构的关系得到了检验。在105名本科生样本中检验了IIP一般因素与人格及反应测量指标的相关性。该一般因素与症状严重程度测量指标以及消极情感性和自我欺骗显著相关,从实质意义上支持了对其的解释。随后,在1093名大学生样本中,考察了IIP的环形结构在一般因素不同水平上的变化情况。根据一般因素将样本分为五个规模相对均等的组。在每个水平上,对IIP量表的环形性进行检验,并计算环形方差,以确定IIP量表的结构类似于圆柱体、球体还是截头圆锥体。对环形顺序模型和环形模型的评估均支持IIP在一般因素所有水平上的环形性。对于较低水平的一般困扰因素,支持圆锥体结构,但较高水平并未表现出预期的相关性离散增加。

相似文献

1
Examination of the General Factor with the Interpersonal Circumplex Structure: Application to the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.运用人际环形结构对一般因素进行检验:应用于人际问题量表
Multivariate Behav Res. 1996 Oct 1;31(4):441-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3104_3.
2
Sex differences in interpersonal problems: a circumplex analysis.人际关系问题中的性别差异:双交叉分析。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):515-27. doi: 10.1037/a0017085.
3
Circumplex structure and personality disorder correlates of the Interpersonal Problems model (IIP-C): construct validity and clinical implications.人际问题模型(IIP-C)的环形结构与人格障碍相关性:结构效度及临床意义
Psychol Assess. 2006 Jun;18(2):165-73. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.165.
4
Inventory of interpersonal problems: a three-dimensional balanced and scalable 48-item version.人际问题清单:一个三维平衡且可扩展的48项版本。
J Pers Assess. 2000 Apr;74(2):296-310. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7402_9.
5
Development and validation of the Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Problems.人际关系问题的环量表的发展与验证。
Psychol Assess. 2018 May;30(5):594-609. doi: 10.1037/pas0000505. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
6
A brief inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Circumplex using nonparametric item response theory: introducing the IIP-C-IRT.使用非参数项目反应理论的人际关系问题-心境双维量表简要清单:介绍 IIP-C-IRT。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jan;93(1):62-75. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.528482.
7
The structure, validity and clinical relevance of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.人际问题量表的结构、效度及临床相关性。
Br J Med Psychol. 1994 Jun;67(2):171-85. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1994.tb01784.x.
8
Psychometric characteristics of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Short Circumplex (IIP-SC) with college students.大学生人际问题简短环形量表(IIP-SC)的心理测量学特征
J Pers Assess. 2008 Nov;90(6):615-8. doi: 10.1080/00223890802388665.
9
Validity of the PAI interpersonal scales for measuring the dimensions of the interpersonal circumplex.PAI 人际关系量表测量人际关系双相模型各维度的有效性。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jan;93(1):33-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.529013.
10
Self and observer reports of interpersonal problems in couples.夫妻间人际问题的自我报告与观察者报告。
J Clin Psychol. 1999 Jan;55(1):27-37. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199901)55:1<27::aid-jclp3>3.0.co;2-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the affect integration inventory - short form in a sample of patients with personality disorder.人格障碍患者样本中情感整合量表简版的心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 31;14:1191752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191752. eCollection 2023.
2
Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C) used with a clinical sample of adolescents: a preliminary study.用于青少年临床样本的人际问题量表(IIP-C)的心理测量特性:一项初步研究。
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2021 Apr 27;9(1):87-95. doi: 10.21307/sjcapp-2021-010. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Narcissism on interpersonal circumplex model: Reactions to imaginary abandonment and rejection.
人际环形模型中的自恋:对想象中的抛弃和拒绝的反应。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:987038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987038. eCollection 2022.
4
An apprenticeship model in the training of psychotherapy students. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and qualitative investigation.一种心理治疗学生培训中的学徒模式。一项随机对照试验和定性研究的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 23;17(8):e0272164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272164. eCollection 2022.
5
Bayesian and Maximum-Likelihood Modeling and Higher-Level Scores of Interpersonal Problems With Circumplex Structure.贝叶斯与最大似然建模以及具有环形结构的人际问题的高级评分
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 29;12:761378. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761378. eCollection 2021.
6
The Relationship between Affect Integration and Psychopathology in Patients with Personality Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study.人格障碍患者情感整合与精神病理学的关系:一项横断面研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 16;57(6):627. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060627.
7
Effectiveness of Open-Ended Psychotherapy Under Clinically Representative Conditions.临床代表性条件下开放式心理治疗的有效性
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 20;11:384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00384. eCollection 2020.
8
The latent structure of interpersonal problems: Validity of dimensional, categorical, and hybrid models.人际关系问题的潜在结构:维度、类别和混合模型的有效性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2019 Nov;128(8):823-839. doi: 10.1037/abn0000460. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
9
Interpersonal dysfunction in personality disorders: A meta-analytic review.人格障碍中的人际功能障碍:一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Jul;143(7):677-734. doi: 10.1037/bul0000101. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
Are there subtypes of panic disorder? An interpersonal perspective.惊恐障碍是否存在亚型?一种人际视角。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Oct;83(5):938-50. doi: 10.1037/a0039373. Epub 2015 Jun 1.