Lombard G L, Whaley D N, Dowell V R
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Dec;16(6):1066-72. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.6.1066-1072.1982.
Using a variety of sporeforming and nonsporeforming anaerobic bacteria, we compared 10 differential agar media of the Anaerobe-Tek (A/T) system recently marketed by Flow Laboratories, Inc. (McLean, Va.) with 10 comparable media in Presumpto quadrant plates (Presumpto 1, 2, and 3) developed by the Centers for Disease Control Anaerobic Bacteria Branch. The A/T identification system was evaluated by comparing the species identity of anaerobes determined as recommended by the manufacturer's instruction manual with the identity of the strains obtained by the Centers for Disease Control Anaerobe Reference Laboratory by using conventional procedures. We also compared reactions obtained with the Presumpto plates with a chopped meat glucose broth culture as a source of inoculum with those obtained by using a turbid cell suspension from growth on blood agar as inoculum. The agreement of results for the 16 characteristics compared ranged from 92.8 to 100%. Comparison of test results obtained with 10 media in the Presumpto plate and A/T systems from the examination of 223 strains of anaerobes, representing 54 different taxa, showed the following agreement between A/T and CDC systems: catalase production, esculin hydrolysis, glucose fermentation, and lecithinase production (100%); inhibition of growth by bile agar (99.6%); lipase production (99%); DNase (98.7%); fermentation of lactose and mannitol (98.2%); starch hydrolysis (96.9%); gelatin hydrolysis (96.4%); and casein hydrolysis (94.6%). Of the 204 strains of common anaerobes tested with the A/T system, only 70% were correctly identified to the species level. However, several strains could have been identified correctly with the A/T system if data on certain other characteristics had been included in the A/T data base.
我们使用了多种形成芽孢和不形成芽孢的厌氧细菌,将弗洛实验室公司(弗吉尼亚州麦克莱恩)最近推出的Anaerobe-Tek(A/T)系统中的10种鉴别琼脂培养基,与疾病控制中心厌氧细菌分支研发的Presumpto象限平板(Presumpto 1、2和3)中的10种类似培养基进行了比较。通过将按照制造商说明书推荐确定的厌氧菌种类与疾病控制中心厌氧菌参考实验室使用传统方法获得的菌株种类进行比较,对A/T鉴定系统进行了评估。我们还比较了以碎肉葡萄糖肉汤培养物作为接种源在Presumpto平板上获得的反应,与以血琼脂上生长的浑浊细胞悬液作为接种物获得的反应。所比较的16项特征的结果一致性在92.8%至100%之间。对代表54个不同分类单元的223株厌氧菌进行检测,比较Presumpto平板和A/T系统中10种培养基的测试结果,结果显示A/T系统与疾病控制中心系统之间在以下方面具有一致性:过氧化氢酶产生(100%)、七叶苷水解(100%)、葡萄糖发酵(100%)和卵磷脂酶产生(100%);胆汁琼脂对生长的抑制作用(99.6%);脂肪酶产生(99%);DNA酶(98.7%);乳糖和甘露醇发酵(98.2%);淀粉水解(96.9%);明胶水解(96.4%);以及酪蛋白水解(94.6%)。在用A/T系统测试的204株常见厌氧菌中,只有70%在种水平上被正确鉴定。然而,如果A/T数据库中包含某些其他特征的数据,一些菌株本可以用A/T系统正确鉴定。