Looney W J, Gallusser A J, Modde H K
Institut Neuchâtelois de Microbiologie, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland.
J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jul;28(7):1519-24. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1519-1524.1990.
A new miniaturized 4-h method for the identification of anaerobic bacteria, ATB 32 A (API System SA, Montalieu Vercieu, France), was evaluated against conventional methods of identification. The evaluation was done by using 260 recent clinical isolates and 21 reference strains of anaerobic bacteria. All reference strains were correctly identified and did not figure in the detailed analysis. Of the 140 gram-negative bacilli, 90.6% of Bacteroides spp. and 95.5% of Fusobacterium spp. were correctly identified to the species level, with an additional 8.4% of the Bacteroides spp. being identified to the genus level. Clostridia were correctly identified in 85.9% of cases, with an additional 9.9% being identified to the genus level. Peptostreptococci were correctly identified in 91.6% of cases. The 4 strains of Actinomyces spp. were all identified correctly, as were 10 of the 11 strains of Propionibacterium spp. A total of 3.1% of strains were not identified by ATB 32 A, while for 1.9% of strains, completely false identifications were obtained. Estimation of the individual preformed enzyme results may pose problems, although these decrease with familiarity with the system. With certain enzyme profiles, additional testing was necessary to arrive at an identification; however, there was no requirement for gas-liquid chromatography. If certain additions are made to the data base and the difficulties of determination of organisms to the species level among the non-Bacteroides fragilis (sensu stricto) members of the B. fragilis group can be reduced, this system holds promise as a reliable standardized alternative for the identification of anaerobic bacteria in clinical laboratories.
一种用于鉴定厌氧菌的新型小型化4小时方法——ATB 32 A(法国蒙塔利厄韦尔西厄的API System SA公司),与传统鉴定方法进行了对比评估。评估使用了260株近期临床分离株和21株厌氧菌参考菌株。所有参考菌株均被正确鉴定,未纳入详细分析。在140株革兰氏阴性杆菌中,90.6%的拟杆菌属和95.5%的梭杆菌属被正确鉴定到种水平,另有8.4%的拟杆菌属被鉴定到属水平。梭菌属在85.9%的病例中被正确鉴定,另有9.9%被鉴定到属水平。消化链球菌在91.6%的病例中被正确鉴定。4株放线菌属菌株均被正确鉴定,11株丙酸杆菌属菌株中的10株也是如此。共有3.1%的菌株未被ATB 32 A鉴定出来,而1.9%的菌株得到了完全错误的鉴定结果。尽管随着对该系统的熟悉,这些问题会减少,但对单个预先形成的酶结果进行评估可能会出现问题。对于某些酶谱,需要进行额外测试才能得出鉴定结果;然而,不需要气液色谱法。如果对数据库进行某些补充,并且能够减少脆弱拟杆菌(严格意义上)组中非脆弱拟杆菌成员中菌株鉴定到种水平的难度,那么该系统有望成为临床实验室鉴定厌氧菌的可靠标准化替代方法。