• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性阑尾炎早期预后的预测因素:延迟急性阑尾炎手术是否可行?一项回顾性研究。

Predictors of early outcome after acute appendicitis: is delaying surgery for acute appendicitis an option? A retrospective study.

作者信息

Youatou Towo P, Ramadan A S E, Ngatchou W, Djiélé J N, Etienne A, Capelluto E, Mols Pr P

机构信息

Department of Emergency, Saint Pierre University Hospital, Rue Haute 322, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of General Surgery, Saint Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Dec;38(6):641-6. doi: 10.1007/s00068-012-0208-8. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-012-0208-8
PMID:26814550
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study analysed the clinical and para-clinical criteria that may allow surgeons and emergency physicians to take a decision regarding the surgery of acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 284 acute appendicitis patients who underwent surgery between January 2007 and December 2009 in our institution. The registered data were extracted from patient files and statistically analysed. These data included past medical history, clinical, laboratory and imaging data, duration of hospital stay and post-operative complications. Patient delay (time between the appearance of symptoms and patient arrival at the emergency department) and hospital delay (time between hospital arrival and operation) were correctly investigated. Statistical analysis was done by using SPSS software.

RESULTS

The patient delay is significantly increased in relation to the severity of appendicitis: 24 h (10.8-30.8 h) versus 37.4 h (36.8-38 h) (P < 0.05), unlike hospital delay, which remains constant (between simple and severe appendicitis): 7.5 h (5-14.8 h) versus 8 h (5-13 h). In severe appendicitis, the proportion of guarding, rebound tenderness, tachycardia (P < 0.05) and fever (P < 0.005) were significantly high, and leucocytosis (P < 0.05), C-reactive protein (CRP) (P < 0.001) and eosinopaenia [37.0 vs. 72.8 (P < 0.001)] were significantly different. Concerning computed tomography (CT) and echography, perforation, abscess formation (P < 0.05), phlegmon (P < 0.005) and peritonitis (P < 0.05) were significant signs of complicated cases. The length of hospital stay (P < 0.001) and duration of antibiotic therapy (P < 0.001) were statistically significant in cases of complicated appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

Patient delay is a determining factor for the grade of appendicitis. It has an influence on the complications, length of hospital stay and duration of antibiotic treatment, unlike hospital delay.

摘要

目的

本研究分析了一些临床和辅助临床标准,这些标准可帮助外科医生和急诊医生就急性阑尾炎的手术做出决策。

方法

对2007年1月至2009年12月期间在本院接受手术的284例急性阑尾炎患者进行回顾性分析。从患者病历中提取登记的数据并进行统计分析。这些数据包括既往病史、临床、实验室和影像学数据、住院时间和术后并发症。正确调查了患者延迟(症状出现至患者到达急诊科的时间)和医院延迟(医院到达至手术的时间)。使用SPSS软件进行统计分析。

结果

患者延迟时间随阑尾炎严重程度显著增加:24小时(10.8 - 30.8小时)对比37.4小时(36.8 - 38小时)(P < 0.05),与医院延迟不同,医院延迟保持不变(单纯性与重度阑尾炎之间):7.5小时(5 - 14.8小时)对比8小时(5 - 13小时)。在重度阑尾炎中,肌紧张、反跳痛、心动过速(P < 0.05)和发热(P < 0.005)的比例显著更高,白细胞增多(P < 0.05)、C反应蛋白(CRP)(P < 0.001)和嗜酸性粒细胞减少[37.0对比72.8(P < 0.001)]有显著差异。关于计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声检查,穿孔、脓肿形成(P < 0.05)、蜂窝织炎(P < 0.005)和腹膜炎(P < 0.05)是复杂病例的显著征象。复杂阑尾炎病例的住院时间(P < 0.001)和抗生素治疗时间(P < 0.001)有统计学意义。

结论

患者延迟是阑尾炎分级的决定因素。与医院延迟不同,它对并发症、住院时间和抗生素治疗时间有影响。

相似文献

1
Predictors of early outcome after acute appendicitis: is delaying surgery for acute appendicitis an option? A retrospective study.急性阑尾炎早期预后的预测因素:延迟急性阑尾炎手术是否可行?一项回顾性研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Dec;38(6):641-6. doi: 10.1007/s00068-012-0208-8. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
2
Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review.阑尾切除术延迟及其相关并发症:一项回顾性研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Mar;76(3):153-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03673.x.
3
[Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques?].[腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:哪些因素影响手术技术的选择?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Feb;130(1):48-54. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-836240.
4
Is acute appendicitis a surgical emergency?急性阑尾炎是外科急症吗?
Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):626-9; discussion 629-30.
5
Efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in appendicitis with peritonitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术在阑尾炎伴腹膜炎中的疗效。
Am Surg. 2005 Jan;71(1):1-4; discussion 4-5.
6
Appendectomy: Should it Be Performed So Quickly?阑尾切除术:是否应如此迅速地进行?
Am Surg. 2016 Jan;82(1):65-74.
7
Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
8
Delays by patients, emergency physicians, and surgeons in the management of acute appendicitis: retrospective study.患者、急诊医生和外科医生在急性阑尾炎治疗中的延误:回顾性研究
Hong Kong Med J. 2000 Sep;6(3):254-9.
9
Antibiotic Duration After Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Acute Complicated Appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性复杂性阑尾炎后的抗生素疗程。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):323-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4236.
10
Perforated appendicitis: urgency or interval surgery?穿孔性阑尾炎:急诊手术还是择期手术?
Zentralbl Chir. 2007 Dec;132(6):539-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-981369.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomies: retrospective study of 2074 cases.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:2074例病例的回顾性研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Apr;18(2):168-72. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31816618f2.
2
Is acute appendicitis a surgical emergency?急性阑尾炎是外科急症吗?
Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):626-9; discussion 629-30.
3
Laparoscopic appendectomies: results of a monocentric prospective and non-randomized study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项单中心前瞻性非随机研究的结果
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jun;54(76):1146-52.
4
The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis.阑尾炎的自然病史与传统治疗方法再探讨:自然缓解与院前穿孔占主导地位意味着正确诊断比早期诊断更为重要。
World J Surg. 2007 Jan;31(1):86-92. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0056-y.
5
Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis?成人急性阑尾炎患者延迟阑尾切除术是否安全?
Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):656-60. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000231726.53487.dd.
6
Effects of delaying appendectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours.将急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术延迟12至24小时的影响。
Arch Surg. 2006 May;141(5):504-6; discussioin 506-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.5.504.
7
How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis.时间如何影响阑尾炎破裂的风险。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar;202(3):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.11.016. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
8
Histologic severity of appendicitis can be predicted by computed tomography.
Arch Surg. 2004 Dec;139(12):1304-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.12.1304.
9
Delayed versus immediate surgery in acute appendicitis: do we need to operate during the night?急性阑尾炎的延迟手术与即时手术:我们需要在夜间进行手术吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Mar;39(3):464-9; discussion 464-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.11.020.
10
Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy.超声检查及选择性计算机断层扫描对阑尾切除术结局的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2003 Oct;13(10):2278-82. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1939-z. Epub 2003 Jul 5.