• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国创伤中心对社区恐怖袭击的准备工作。

US Trauma Center Preparation for a Terrorist Attack in the Community.

作者信息

Trunkey Donald D

机构信息

Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L223, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Jun;35(3):244-64. doi: 10.1007/s00068-009-9901-7. Epub 2009 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-009-9901-7
PMID:26814901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, federal and state funding, primarily from the National Bioterrorism Hospital Preparedness Program, has resulted in a surge of hospital activity to prepare for future natural or human-caused catastrophes. Trauma centers were integrally involved in the response to the 2001 attacks as first receivers of patients, communication hubs, and as convergence sites for families, the worried well, volunteers, and donors. After the Madrid train station terrorist attack, Congress identified the need to study trauma center preparedness as an essential part of the nation's emergency management system.

METHODS

The NFTC received a one-year grant funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC/NCIPC) to survey the capability and capacity of trauma centers to respond successfully to mass casualty incidents, particularly those brought about by acts of terrorism. This report summarizes responses to a US CDC/NCIPC-funded survey, R 49 CE000792-01, sent to all designated or verified Level I and II trauma centers in the US, to which 33% or 175 trauma centers replied.

RESULTS

The results are categorized by preparedness scoring, vulnerability, threats, and funding. Planning communication, surge capacity, diversion, sustainability, special populations, and finance represent additional categories examined in the survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma centers are a major resource in disaster management. One-hundred and seventy-five centers candidly reported their resources and vulnerabilities. This inventory should be expanded to all trauma centers and recommendations for change as discussed.

摘要

背景

自2001年美国遭受恐怖袭击以来,主要来自国家生物恐怖主义医院准备计划的联邦和州资金,促使医院活动激增,以应对未来的自然或人为灾难。创伤中心作为患者的首批接收者、通信枢纽以及家属、健康焦虑者、志愿者和捐赠者的聚集场所,全面参与了对2001年袭击事件的应对。马德里火车站恐怖袭击事件后,国会确定有必要研究创伤中心的准备情况,将其作为国家应急管理系统的重要组成部分。

方法

国家创伤中心协作组织(NFTC)获得了美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC/NCIPC)提供的为期一年的资助,以调查创伤中心成功应对大规模伤亡事件,特别是恐怖主义行为导致的此类事件的能力。本报告总结了对美国疾病控制与预防中心/国家伤害预防与控制中心资助的一项调查(编号R 49 CE000792 - 01)的回复情况,该调查发送给了美国所有指定或经核实的一级和二级创伤中心,有33%(即175个)创伤中心进行了回复。

结果

结果按准备情况评分、脆弱性、威胁和资金进行分类。规划沟通、应急能力、分流、可持续性、特殊人群和财务是调查中涉及的其他分类。

结论

创伤中心是灾难管理中的主要资源。175个中心坦率地报告了它们的资源和脆弱性。应将这份清单扩展到所有创伤中心,并按讨论情况提出变革建议。

相似文献

1
US Trauma Center Preparation for a Terrorist Attack in the Community.美国创伤中心对社区恐怖袭击的准备工作。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Jun;35(3):244-64. doi: 10.1007/s00068-009-9901-7. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
2
A Geographic Simulation Model for the Treatment of Trauma Patients in Disasters.一种用于灾害中创伤患者治疗的地理模拟模型。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Aug;31(4):413-21. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000510. Epub 2016 May 25.
3
What If Nice Terrorist Attack Would Have Happened in Milan? Drawing a Disaster Plan for Mass Casualty Incidents Involving the Pediatric Population.如果在米兰发生了一场“美好”的恐怖袭击会怎样?制定一份针对涉及儿童群体的大规模伤亡事件的灾难预案。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2024 May 30;18:e94. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2024.45.
4
Terrorism preparedness: Web-based resource management and the TOPOFF 3 exercise.恐怖主义防范:基于网络的资源管理与“顶级官员 3 号”演习
J Trauma. 2006 Mar;60(3):566-71; discussion 571-72. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197379.40878.c7.
5
Chemical or biological terrorist attacks: an analysis of the preparedness of hospitals for managing victims affected by chemical or biological weapons of mass destruction.化学或生物恐怖袭击:医院应对大规模杀伤性化学或生物武器受害者的准备情况分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2006 Mar;3(1):67-75. doi: 10.3390/ijerph2006030008.
6
Terrorism: a public health threat with a trauma system response.恐怖主义:一种需创伤系统应对的公共卫生威胁。
J Trauma. 2003 Dec;55(6):1014-21. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000084515.74480.BA.
7
The state of US trauma systems: public perceptions versus reality--implications for US response to terrorism and mass casualty events.美国创伤系统的现状:公众认知与现实——对美国应对恐怖主义和大规模伤亡事件的启示
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):951-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.019.
8
Communication failure in the prehospital response to major terrorist attacks: lessons learned and future directions.重大恐怖袭击事件院前反应中的沟通失败:经验教训与未来方向。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1741-1750. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02131-6. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
9
The current status of disaster preparedness in Canadian trauma centers.加拿大创伤中心的备灾现状。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Sep;89(3):e78-e83. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002807.
10
Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?放射性物质释放的应急响应:我们是否已与应急响应人员群体进行了有效沟通,使其做好安全应对这些事件的准备?
Health Phys. 2018 Feb;114(2):208-213. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000757.

引用本文的文献

1
Pattern of bioterrorism in ancient times: lessons to be learned from the microbial and toxicological aspects.古代生物恐怖主义的模式:从微生物学和毒理学角度吸取的教训。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2024 Oct;174(13-14):288-298. doi: 10.1007/s10354-023-01029-1. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
2
Concept review of regionalized systems of acute care: Is regionalization the next frontier in sepsis care?急性护理区域化系统的概念综述:区域化是脓毒症护理的下一个前沿领域吗?
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jan 6;3(1):e12631. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12631. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
Focus on Disaster Medicine Introduction to the second "Focus-on" Disaster and Military Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
An update on the surgeons scope and depth of practice to all hazards emergency response.关于外科医生对所有危害应急响应的实践范围和深度的最新情况。
J Trauma. 2006 Jun;60(6):1267-74. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000220665.03167.09.
2
A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality.一项关于创伤中心护理对死亡率影响的全国性评估。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 26;354(4):366-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa052049.
3
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: role of individuals and collaborative networks in mobilizing/coordinating societal and professional resources for major disasters.
聚焦灾难医学 第二届“聚焦”灾难与军事外科学介绍
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009 Jun;35(3):199. doi: 10.1007/s00068-009-9003-6.
4
Evaluation of admissions to the Major Incident Hospital based on a standardized protocol.基于标准化方案对重大事件医院的入院情况进行评估。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011 Feb;37(1):19-29. doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-0067-0. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
卡特里娜飓风和丽塔飓风:个人及协作网络在为重大灾难调动/协调社会及专业资源方面的作用。
Crit Care. 2006 Feb;10(1):205. doi: 10.1186/cc3942.
4
The importance of evidence-based disaster planning.基于证据的灾难规划的重要性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;47(1):34-49. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.05.009. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
5
Hurricane Katrina. Unexpected necessities--inside Charity Hospital.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 13;353(15):1550-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058239.
6
Hurricane Katrina. Finding supplies.卡特里娜飓风。寻找物资。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 13;353(15):1542. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058230.
7
The experience at St. Vincent's Hospital, Manhattan, on September 11, 2001: preparedness, response, and lessons learned.2001年9月11日曼哈顿圣文森特医院的经历:准备、应对及经验教训
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;33(1 Suppl):S48-52. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000151067.76074.21.
8
Implications of hospital evacuation after the Northridge, California, earthquake.加利福尼亚州北岭地震后医院疏散的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1349-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021807.
9
Lessons learned from the evacuation of an urban teaching hospital.从一家城市教学医院的疏散中学到的经验教训。
Arch Surg. 2002 Oct;137(10):1141-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.10.1141.
10
Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury-related mortality: a national evaluation.国家创伤系统在降低创伤相关死亡率方面的有效性:一项全国性评估。
J Trauma. 2000 Jan;48(1):25-30; discussion 30-1. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200001000-00005.