Grønli Janne, Rempe Michael J, Clegern William C, Schmidt Michelle, Wisor Jonathan P
College of Medical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
Sleep and Performance Research Center, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
J Sleep Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):257-68. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12380. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
Markers of sleep drive (<10 Hz; slow-wave activity and theta) have been identified in the course of slow-wave sleep and wakefulness. So far, higher frequencies in the waking electroencephalogram have not been examined thoroughly as a function of sleep drive. Here, electroencephalogram dynamics were measured in epochs of active wake (wake characterized by high muscle tone) or quiet wake (wake characterized by low muscle tone). It was hypothesized that the higher beta oscillations (15-35 Hz, measured by local field potential and electroencephalography) represent fundamentally different processes in active wake and quiet wake. In active wake, sensory stimulation elevated beta activity in parallel with gamma (80-90 Hz) activity, indicative of cognitive processing. In quiet wake, beta activity paralleled slow-wave activity (1-4 Hz) and theta (5-8 Hz) in tracking sleep need. Cerebral lactate concentration, a measure of cerebral glucose utilization, increased during active wake whereas it declined during quiet wake. Mathematical modelling of state-dependent dynamics of cortical lactate concentration was more precisely predictive when quiet wake and active wake were included as two distinct substates rather than a uniform state of wakefulness. The extent to which lactate concentration declined in quiet wake and increased in active wake was proportionate to the amount of beta activity. These data distinguish quiet wake from active wake. Quiet wake, particularly when characterized by beta activity, is permissive to metabolic and electrophysiological changes that occur in slow-wave sleep. These data urge further studies on state-dependent beta oscillations across species.
睡眠驱动力的标志物(<10Hz;慢波活动和θ波)已在慢波睡眠和清醒过程中被识别出来。到目前为止,清醒脑电图中的高频尚未作为睡眠驱动力的函数进行深入研究。在此,在主动清醒(以高肌张力为特征的清醒)或安静清醒(以低肌张力为特征的清醒)阶段测量脑电图动态。据推测,较高的β振荡(15 - 35Hz,通过局部场电位和脑电图测量)在主动清醒和安静清醒中代表着根本不同的过程。在主动清醒时,感觉刺激会使β活动与γ(80 - 90Hz)活动同步升高,这表明存在认知加工。在安静清醒时,β活动与慢波活动(1 - 4Hz)和θ波(5 - 8Hz)同步,以追踪睡眠需求。脑乳酸浓度是脑葡萄糖利用的一个指标,在主动清醒期间升高,而在安静清醒期间下降。当将安静清醒和主动清醒作为两个不同的子状态而非统一的清醒状态纳入时,皮质乳酸浓度状态依赖动力学的数学模型具有更精确的预测性。安静清醒时乳酸浓度下降和主动清醒时乳酸浓度升高的程度与β活动量成比例。这些数据区分了安静清醒和主动清醒。安静清醒,尤其是以β活动为特征时,允许在慢波睡眠中发生的代谢和电生理变化。这些数据促使对跨物种的状态依赖β振荡进行进一步研究。