Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍与精神分裂症中功能失调的食欲和厌恶动机的不同模式:一项事件相关电位研究。

Distinct patterns of dysfunctional appetitive and aversive motivation in bipolar disorder versus schizophrenia: An event-related potential study.

作者信息

Horan William P, Wynn Jonathan K, Hajcak Greg, Altshuler Lori, Green Michael F

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System.

Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 May;125(4):576-87. doi: 10.1037/abn0000142. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

Abstract

Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are associated with different clinical profiles of disturbances in motivation, yet few studies have compared the neurophysiological correlates of such disturbances. Outpatients with schizophrenia (n = 34), or bipolar disorder I (n = 33), and healthy controls (n = 31) completed a task in which the late positive potential (LPP), an index of motivated attention, was assessed along motivational gradients determined by apparent distance from potential rewards or punishments. Sequences of cues signaling possible monetary gains or losses appeared to loom progressively closer to the viewer; a reaction time (RT) task after the final cue determined the outcome. Controls showed the expected pattern with LPPs for appetitive and aversive cues that were initially elevated, smaller during intermediate positions, and escalated just prior to the RT task. The clinical groups showed different patterns in the final positions just prior to the RT task: the bipolar group's LPPs to both types of cues peaked relatively early during looming sequences and subsequently decreased, whereas the schizophrenia group showed relatively small LPP escalations, particularly for aversive cues. These distinct patterns suggest that the temporal unfolding of attentional resource allocation for motivationally significant events may qualitatively differ between these disorders. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

精神分裂症和双相情感障碍与动机障碍的不同临床特征相关,但很少有研究比较这些障碍的神经生理学关联。精神分裂症门诊患者(n = 34)、双相I型障碍门诊患者(n = 33)和健康对照者(n = 31)完成了一项任务,在该任务中,沿着由与潜在奖励或惩罚的视在距离所确定的动机梯度,对作为动机性注意指标的晚期正电位(LPP)进行评估。提示可能金钱收益或损失的线索序列似乎逐渐向观察者靠近;最后一个线索后的反应时间(RT)任务决定结果。对照组呈现出预期模式,对奖励性和惩罚性线索的LPP最初升高,在中间位置变小,在RT任务前又升高。临床组在RT任务前的最后位置呈现出不同模式:双相情感障碍组对两种类型线索的LPP在逼近序列中相对较早达到峰值,随后下降,而精神分裂症组的LPP升高相对较小,尤其是对惩罚性线索。这些不同模式表明,在这些障碍中,针对动机性显著事件的注意资源分配的时间展开可能在性质上有所不同。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验