Otani Naruhito, Tanaka Miyuki, Maeda Kazuhiro, Gomi Yasuyuki, Nakajima Kazuhiko, Tanimura Susumu, Takesue Yoshio, Shima Masayuki, Okuno Toshiomi
Department of Public Health, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Kanonji Institute, The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University, Kanonji, Kagawa, Japan.
J Infect Chemother. 2016 Apr;22(4):225-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.12.018. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
Antibody tests for the varicella zoster virus (VZV) include neutralization, fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen (FAMA), immune adherence hemagglutination (IAHA), enzyme immunoassay (EIA), glycoprotein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA), and complement fixation (CF) tests. Of these, FAMA is considered the most sensitive. However, in Japan, the EIA method is most frequently employed.
The VZV antibody detection rate of the FAMA, EIA, gpELISA, and IAHA methods was compared.
Four types of antibody tests were conducted with sera collected from 83 college students. The relationships between two antibody tests were examined using Pearson's correlation coefficients.
All 83 subjects were observed to be VZV antibody-positive using the FAMA method. The Pearson correlation coefficients of gpELISA, EIA, and IAHA relative to FAMA were 0.808, 0.782, and 0.356, respectively. The positive agreement rate of IAHA relative to FAMA was 88.0% (73/83), whereas those of gpELISA and EIA were both 97.6% (81/83). Furthermore, EIA showed 100% positive agreement with gpELISA and a high correlation coefficient of 0.911, whereas these values for IAHA compared to gpELISA were much lower (90.1% and 0.530). The calculated Pearson correlation coefficient for comparison of the EIA and IAHA methods was 0.498, with a positive agreement rate of 90.1% (73/81).
The EIA method should be employed in Japan based on the similarity of the positivity between EIA and gpELISA, as it is more available and practical than gpELISA.
水痘带状疱疹病毒(VZV)抗体检测方法包括中和试验、膜抗原荧光抗体试验(FAMA)、免疫黏附血凝试验(IAHA)、酶免疫测定法(EIA)、基于糖蛋白的酶联免疫吸附测定法(gpELISA)和补体结合试验(CF)。其中,FAMA被认为是最敏感的。然而,在日本,EIA方法使用最为频繁。
比较FAMA、EIA、gpELISA和IAHA方法检测VZV抗体的阳性率。
对83名大学生采集的血清进行了4种抗体检测。使用Pearson相关系数检验两种抗体检测方法之间的关系。
采用FAMA方法检测,83名受试者均为VZV抗体阳性。gpELISA、EIA和IAHA相对于FAMA的Pearson相关系数分别为0.808、0.782和0.356。IAHA相对于FAMA的阳性符合率为88.0%(73/83),而gpELISA和EIA的阳性符合率均为97.6%(81/83)。此外,EIA与gpELISA的阳性符合率为100%,相关系数高达0.911,而IAHA与gpELISA相比,这些值要低得多(90.1%和0.530)。EIA和IAHA方法比较的计算Pearson相关系数为0.498,阳性符合率为90.1%(73/81)。
基于EIA与gpELISA阳性结果的相似性,日本应采用EIA方法,因为它比gpELISA更易于获得且更实用。