Yao Jie, Li Dan-Dan, Yang Yan-Qi, McGrath Colman Patrick Joseph, Mattheos Nikos
Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital 4/F, 34 Hospital Road, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Nanjing Medical University, HanZhong Road 140, NanJing, 210029, China.
BMC Oral Health. 2016 Feb 17;16:19. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0182-3.
What patients expect to happen during treatment or benefit from the treatment might influence the subsequent factors such as treatment outcome, patient satisfaction, patient's cooperation as well as compliance. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the role of patients' expectations from orthodontic treatment.
A systematic literature search of four databases Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science and PsychINFO was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting expectations regarding orthodontic treatment were selected and a narrative review was conducted. The quality of study was rated according to STROBE statements and the methodology as well as key findings were summarized.
Thirteen studies (14 papers) were finally included for analysis. Among them, only one was a randomized control trial, while the rest included one cohort study, two questionnaire-developments and ten cross-sectional studies. The STROBE quality of reporting scores of the studies ranged from 12 to 18. Seven papers described expectations of the treatment experiences, along with seven talking about benefit expectations from the treatment. Dental appearance and function improvement were most expected in studies relate to the treatment benefits.
Orthodontics appears to have adopted various standardized questionnaires. However, most of them are poor in the quality of methodology and results analyses, which prohibit synthesizing sufficient evidence to help identify which factors influence patient expectations. The evidence of "expectations" affecting treatment outcomes is not found in current research. Future studies are needed to better understand the impact of "expectation" on the treatment both theoretically and experimentally.
患者对治疗过程的期望或从治疗中获得的益处可能会影响后续因素,如治疗结果、患者满意度、患者的合作程度以及依从性。本系统评价的目的是评估患者对正畸治疗期望的作用。
按照PRISMA指南,对四个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane、科学网和PsychINFO)进行系统的文献检索。选择报告正畸治疗期望的研究并进行叙述性综述。根据STROBE声明对研究质量进行评分,并总结方法和主要发现。
最终纳入13项研究(14篇论文)进行分析。其中,只有一项是随机对照试验,其余包括一项队列研究、两项问卷开发研究和十项横断面研究。这些研究的STROBE报告质量得分在12至18分之间。七篇论文描述了对治疗体验的期望,另外七篇讨论了对治疗益处的期望。在与治疗益处相关的研究中,牙齿外观和功能改善是最主要的期望。
正畸学似乎采用了各种标准化问卷。然而,其中大多数在方法学和结果分析质量方面较差,这使得无法综合足够的证据来帮助确定哪些因素影响患者期望。目前的研究未发现“期望”影响治疗结果的证据。未来需要开展研究,以便从理论和实验两方面更好地理解“期望”对治疗的影响。