• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微小息肉的根除:双极电凝与传统活检切除的前瞻性评估

Eradication of diminutive polyps: a prospective evaluation of bipolar coagulation versus conventional biopsy removal.

作者信息

Woods A, Sanowski R A, Wadas D D, Manne R K, Friess S W

机构信息

Gastroenterology Section, Carl T. Hayden Veterans Administration Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85012.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1989 Nov-Dec;35(6):536-40. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72906-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72906-0
PMID:2689263
Abstract

Bipolar probe coagulation (BICAP) was evaluated and compared with conventional cold biopsy (CBx) as a potential therapeutic modality for eradication of diminutive colonic polyps (DPs). Seventy-seven and 79 DPs were treated with BICAP and CBx, respectively. Twenty-one percent of the BICAP and 29% of the CBx (p greater than 0.05) group had residual polypoid tissue detected at flexible sigmoidoscopy 3 weeks after treatment. Because of incomplete polyp removal, CBx and BICAP coagulation cannot be recommended as definitive therapies for DPs. Neoplasia was present in 22% of DPs located less than 60 cm from the anus, 73% of proximally located small polyps, and 32% of all DPs. Despite apparent eradication at the time of treatment, the incidence of residual polypoid tissue would suggest the need for critical evaluation of other modalities used to eradicate or remove DPs.

摘要

对双极探头凝固术(BICAP)进行了评估,并与传统冷活检(CBx)进行比较,将其作为根除微小结肠息肉(DP)的一种潜在治疗方式。分别用BICAP和CBx治疗了77个和79个DP。治疗3周后,在乙状结肠镜检查中,BICAP组有21%、CBx组有29%(p>0.05)检测到残留息肉样组织。由于息肉切除不完全,CBx和BICAP凝固术不能作为DP的确定性治疗方法推荐。距肛门小于60 cm的DP中22%存在肿瘤形成,近端小息肉中73%存在肿瘤形成,所有DP中32%存在肿瘤形成。尽管在治疗时息肉明显被根除,但残留息肉样组织的发生率表明需要对用于根除或切除DP的其他方式进行严格评估。

相似文献

1
Eradication of diminutive polyps: a prospective evaluation of bipolar coagulation versus conventional biopsy removal.微小息肉的根除:双极电凝与传统活检切除的前瞻性评估
Gastrointest Endosc. 1989 Nov-Dec;35(6):536-40. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(89)72906-0.
2
Follow-up of hot biopsy forceps treatment of diminutive colonic polyps.微小结肠息肉热活检钳治疗的随访
Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Nov-Dec;37(6):604-6. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70863-8.
3
Status evaluation: hot biopsy forceps. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Technology Assessment Committee.状态评估:热活检钳。美国胃肠内镜学会。技术评估委员会。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1992 Nov-Dec;38(6):753-6.
4
Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps.活检钳对于切除微小息肉是不够的。
Endoscopy. 2011 Apr;43(4):312-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256086. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
5
Adequacy of "hot biopsy" for the treatment of diminutive polyps: a prospective randomized trial.“热活检”治疗微小息肉的充分性:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1989 Apr;84(4):383-5.
6
Diminutive colonic polyps: an indication for colonoscopy.
Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Feb;35(2):178-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02050675.
7
Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center.内镜转诊中心导向的挑战性结直肠病变内镜黏膜下剥离术的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Aug;76(2):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 May 31.
8
Complete biopsy resection of diminutive polyps.完整切除微小息肉。
Endoscopy. 2013 Dec;45(12):1024-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344394. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Tiny snares prove safe and effective for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps.微小圈套器在切除微小结直肠息肉方面被证明是安全有效的。
Gastrointest Endosc. 1994 May-Jun;40(3):301-3. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(94)70060-5.
10
The efficacy and safety of argon plasma coagulation (APC) in the management of polyp remnants in stomach and colon.氩等离子体凝固术(APC)治疗胃和结肠息肉残留的疗效及安全性
Adv Med Sci. 2006;51:88-93.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic Biopsies and Histopathological Findings in Diagnosing Chronic Gastrointestinal Disorders in Dogs and Cats.内镜活检及组织病理学检查结果在犬猫慢性胃肠疾病诊断中的应用
Vet Med Int. 2020 Oct 9;2020:8827538. doi: 10.1155/2020/8827538. eCollection 2020.
2
Clinical guidance on endoscopic management of colonic polyps in Singapore.新加坡结肠息肉内镜管理临床指南。
Singapore Med J. 2022 Apr;63(4):173-186. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2020108. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
High-flow nasal oxygenation versus standard oxygenation for gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation. The prospective multicentre randomised controlled ODEPHI study protocol.
高流量鼻氧疗与镇静下胃肠内镜标准氧疗的比较:前瞻性多中心随机对照 ODEPHI 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e034701. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034701.
4
A prospective randomized study comparing jumbo biopsy forceps to cold snare for the resection of diminutive colorectal polyps.一项比较巨检活检钳与冷圈套切除微小结直肠息肉的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1206-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06874-z. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
Validation of treatment algorithm based on the Japan narrow-band imaging expert team classification for sub-centimeter colorectal polyps.基于日本窄带成像专家组对亚厘米结直肠息肉分类的治疗算法验证
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Aug;6(8):E934-E940. doi: 10.1055/a-0621-4445. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
6
A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy.一种确定结肠镜息肉切除术难度的新方法。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct;4(4):244-248. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2013-100331. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
7
Resection of Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps: What Is the Optimal Technique?微小及小的结直肠息肉切除术:最佳技术是什么?
Clin Endosc. 2016 Jul;49(4):355-8. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.063. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
8
Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?结肠息肉的监测:我们做得对吗?
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 14;22(6):1925-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i6.1925.
9
Polypectomy practices of sub-centimeter polyps in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.英国肠癌筛查计划中对亚厘米级息肉的息肉切除术操作
Surg Endosc. 2015 Nov;29(11):3224-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4064-6. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
10
The histological quality and adequacy of diminutive colorectal polyps resected using jumbo versus hot biopsy forceps.使用巨型活检钳与热活检钳切除的微小结直肠息肉的组织学质量和完整性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Jan;60(1):217-25. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3320-2. Epub 2014 Aug 12.