Corona-Villalobos Celia P, Sorensen Lars L, Pozios Iraklis, Chu Linda, Eng John, Abraham Maria Roselle, Abraham Theodore P, Kamel Ihab R, Zimmerman Stefan L
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 North Caroline Street; JHOC 3142, Box 0818, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Harvey 611, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jun;32(6):945-54. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0858-4. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
We assessed whether cardiac MRI (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) have significant differences measuring left ventricular (LV) wall thickness (WT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) as performed in the clinical routine. Retrospectively identified, clinically diagnosed HCM patients with interventricular-septal (IVS) pattern hypertrophy who underwent CMR and echo within the same day were included. Left Ventricular WT was measured by CMR in two planes and compared to both echo and contrast echo (cecho). 72 subjects, mean age 50.7 ± 16.2 years, 68 % males. Interventricular septal WT by echo and CMR planes showed good to excellent correlation. However, measurements of the postero-lateral wall showed poor correlation. Bland-Altman plots showed greater maximal IVS WT by echo compared to CMR measurement [SAX = 1.7 mm (-5.8, 9.3); LVOT = 1.1 mm (-5.6, 7.8)]. Differences were smaller between cecho and CMR [SAX = 0.8 mm (-9.2, 10.8); LVOT = -0.2 mm (-10.0, 9.6)]. Severity of WT by quartiles showed greater differences between echo and SAX CMR WT compared to cecho. Echocardiography typically measures greater WT than CMR, with the largest differences in moderate to severe hypertrophy. Contrast echocardiography more closely approximates CMR measurements of WT. These findings have potential clinical implications for risk stratification of subjects with HCM.
我们评估了在临床常规操作中,心脏磁共振成像(CMR)和超声心动图(echo)在测量肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者左心室(LV)壁厚度(WT)方面是否存在显著差异。纳入了回顾性确定的、临床诊断为室间隔(IVS)型肥厚且在同一天接受CMR和echo检查的HCM患者。通过CMR在两个平面测量左心室WT,并与echo和对比增强超声心动图(cecho)进行比较。72名受试者,平均年龄50.7±16.2岁,68%为男性。echo和CMR平面测量的室间隔WT显示出良好至极好的相关性。然而,后侧壁的测量显示相关性较差。布兰德-奥特曼图显示,与CMR测量相比,echo测量的室间隔WT最大值更大[短轴(SAX)=1.7毫米(-5.8,9.3);左心室流出道(LVOT)=1.1毫米(-5.6,7.8)]。cecho和CMR之间的差异较小[SAX=0.8毫米(-9.2,10.8);LVOT=-0.2毫米(-10.0,9.6)]。按四分位数划分的WT严重程度显示,与cecho相比,echo和SAX CMR WT之间的差异更大。超声心动图通常测量的WT比CMR更大,在中度至重度肥厚中差异最大。对比增强超声心动图更接近CMR对WT的测量。这些发现对HCM患者的风险分层具有潜在的临床意义。