Timmings Caitlyn, Khan Sobia, Moore Julia E, Marquez Christine, Pyka Kasha, Straus Sharon E
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, M5B 1W8, Canada.
University of Toronto, 563 Spadina Crescent, Toronto, M5S 2J7, Canada.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Feb 24;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0262-y.
To address challenges related to selecting a valid, reliable, and appropriate readiness assessment measure in practice, we developed an online decision support tool to aid frontline implementers in healthcare settings in this process. The focus of this paper is to describe a multi-step, end-user driven approach to developing this tool for use during the planning stages of implementation.
A multi-phase, end-user driven approach was used to develop and test the usability of a readiness decision support tool. First, readiness assessment measures that are valid, reliable, and appropriate for healthcare settings were identified from a systematic review. Second, a mapping exercise was performed to categorize individual items of included measures according to key readiness constructs from an existing framework. Third, a modified Delphi process was used to collect stakeholder ratings of the included measures on domains of feasibility, relevance, and likelihood to recommend. Fourth, two versions of a decision support tool prototype were developed and evaluated for usability.
Nine valid and reliable readiness assessment measures were included in the decision support tool. The mapping exercise revealed that of the nine measures, most measures (78 %) focused on assessing readiness for change at the organizational versus the individual level, and that four measures (44 %) represented all constructs of organizational readiness. During the modified Delphi process, stakeholders rated most measures as feasible and relevant for use in practice, and reported that they would be likely to recommend use of most measures. Using data from the mapping exercise and stakeholder panel, an algorithm was developed to link users to a measure based on characteristics of their organizational setting and their readiness for change assessment priorities. Usability testing yielded recommendations that were used to refine the Ready, Set, Change! decision support tool .
Ready, Set, Change! decision support tool is an implementation support that is designed to facilitate the routine incorporation of a readiness assessment as an early step in implementation. Use of this tool in practice may offer time and resource-saving implications for implementation.
为应对在实践中选择有效、可靠且合适的准备情况评估方法所面临的挑战,我们开发了一种在线决策支持工具,以协助医疗环境中的一线实施人员开展这一工作。本文重点描述一种多步骤、由最终用户驱动的方法,用于开发此工具,以便在实施规划阶段使用。
采用多阶段、由最终用户驱动的方法来开发和测试准备情况决策支持工具的可用性。首先,通过系统综述确定适用于医疗环境的有效、可靠且合适的准备情况评估方法。其次,进行映射分析,根据现有框架中的关键准备情况构建要素对纳入方法的各个项目进行分类。第三,采用改良的德尔菲法收集利益相关者对纳入方法在可行性、相关性和推荐可能性等方面的评分。第四,开发了两个版本的决策支持工具原型,并对其可用性进行评估。
决策支持工具纳入了9种有效且可靠的准备情况评估方法。映射分析显示,在这9种方法中,大多数方法(78%)侧重于评估组织层面而非个人层面的变革准备情况,且有4种方法(44%)涵盖了组织准备情况的所有构建要素。在改良的德尔菲法过程中,利益相关者将大多数方法评为在实践中可行且相关,并表示他们可能会推荐使用大多数方法。利用映射分析和利益相关者小组的数据,开发了一种算法,根据组织环境特征和变革准备情况评估优先级,将用户与相应方法相匹配。可用性测试提出了用于完善“准备、就绪、改变!”决策支持工具的建议。
“准备、就绪、改变!”决策支持工具是一种实施支持手段,旨在促进将准备情况评估作为实施的早期步骤常规纳入其中。在实践中使用该工具可能会节省实施过程中的时间和资源。