Boote Jonathan, Newsome Ruth, Reddington Michael, Cole Ashley, Dimairo Munyaradzi
University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Physiother Res Int. 2017 Jul;22(3). doi: 10.1002/pri.1665. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
Sciatica is a common clinical condition that can be extremely painful, disabling and life-changing. Whether conservative or surgical treatment for sciatica secondary to an intervertebral disc prolapse is most effective is still much debated. An important component of conservative treatment is physiotherapy, which aims to promote physical and psychological health for the patient, whilst resorption of the disc takes place. This paper reports a qualitative study of patients' views and experiences of a bespoke physiotherapy intervention for the treatment of sciatica.
A qualitative study nested within a pilot randomized controlled trial of bespoke physiotherapy for the treatment of patients with sciatica awaiting lumbar microdiscectomy surgery. Patients randomized to receive bespoke physiotherapy in the intervention arm of the trial were invited to take part in semi-structured interviews. Twenty-one in-depth, semi-structured interviews took place. All interviews were recorded, fully transcribed and thematically analysed.
Most patients in the sample found the physiotherapy valuable, appreciating the individual nature of the approach, the exercises to reduce pain and discomfort, techniques for improving functional spinal movement, walking and dynamic posture, and manual therapy and cardiovascular exercise. A small number did not find the physiotherapy of benefit. Sixteen patients in the sample went on to proceed with surgery, but most of these found value in having had the physiotherapy first.
Many patients with sciatica appreciate the value of physiotherapy prior to surgery. Future research should examine patients' experiences of bespoke physiotherapy delivered within primary care. Copyright © 2016 The Authors Physiotherapy Research International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
坐骨神经痛是一种常见的临床病症,会带来极度疼痛、功能障碍并改变生活。对于因椎间盘突出继发的坐骨神经痛,保守治疗还是手术治疗最为有效,目前仍存在诸多争议。保守治疗的一个重要组成部分是物理治疗,其目的是在椎间盘吸收的同时促进患者的身心健康。本文报告了一项关于患者对定制物理治疗干预措施治疗坐骨神经痛的观点和体验的定性研究。
这是一项定性研究,嵌套于一项针对等待腰椎显微椎间盘切除术的坐骨神经痛患者的定制物理治疗的试点随机对照试验中。被随机分配到试验干预组接受定制物理治疗的患者受邀参加半结构化访谈。共进行了21次深入的半结构化访谈。所有访谈均进行了录音、完整转录并进行了主题分析。
样本中的大多数患者认为物理治疗很有价值,认可这种个性化的治疗方式、减轻疼痛和不适的锻炼方法、改善脊柱功能活动、行走和动态姿势的技巧,以及手法治疗和心血管运动。少数患者认为物理治疗没有益处。样本中的16名患者后来接受了手术,但其中大多数人认为先进行物理治疗是有价值的。
许多坐骨神经痛患者认可手术前物理治疗的价值。未来的研究应考察患者在初级保健中接受定制物理治疗的体验。版权所有© 2016作者。《国际物理治疗研究》由约翰·威利父子有限公司出版。