Suppr超能文献

衡量风险认知:过度使用 50%意味着什么?

Measuring risk perceptions: what does the excessive use of 50% mean?

机构信息

Departments of Social and Decision Sciences and of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (WBB)

Department of Economics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands (KGC)

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):232-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11404077. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Risk perceptions are central to good health decisions. People can judge valid probabilities but use 50% disproportionately. The authors hypothesized that 50% is more likely than other responses to reflect not knowing the probability, especially among individuals with low education and numeracy, and evaluated the usefulness of eliciting "don't know" explanations.

METHODS

Respondents (n = 1020) judged probabilities for living or dying in the next 10 years, indicating whether they gave a good estimate or did not know the chances. They completed demographics, medical history, and numeracy questions.

RESULTS

Overall, 50% was more likely than other probabilities to be explained as "don't know" (v. "a good estimate"). Correlations of using 50% with low education and numeracy were mediated by expressing "don't know." Judged probabilities for survival and mortality explained as "don't know" had lower correlations with age, diseases, and specialist visits.

CONCLUSIONS

When judging risks, 50% may reflect not knowing the probability, especially among individuals with low numeracy and education. Probabilities expressed as "don't know" are less valid. Eliciting uncertainty could benefit theoretical models and educational efforts.

摘要

目的

风险认知是做出健康决策的关键。人们可以判断有效的概率,但却过度依赖 50%。作者假设,50%的回答比其他回答更有可能反映出不知道概率,尤其是在受教育程度和计算能力较低的人群中,并评估了引出“不知道”解释的有用性。

方法

本研究共纳入了 1020 名受访者,要求他们判断在未来 10 年内的生存或死亡概率,并表示他们是否给出了较好的估计或不知道机会的概率。他们还完成了人口统计学、病史和计算能力方面的问题。

结果

总体而言,50%的概率比其他概率更有可能被解释为“不知道”(v. “一个好的估计”)。用 50%来表示“不知道”的概率与受教育程度和计算能力较低之间的相关性,受到了表达“不知道”的中介作用。解释为“不知道”的生存和死亡率的判断概率与年龄、疾病和专科就诊的相关性较低。

结论

在判断风险时,50%可能反映出不知道概率,尤其是在计算能力和受教育程度较低的人群中。表示为“不知道”的概率不太有效。引出不确定性可能会使理论模型和教育工作受益。

相似文献

1
Measuring risk perceptions: what does the excessive use of 50% mean?衡量风险认知:过度使用 50%意味着什么?
Med Decis Making. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):232-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11404077. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

7
Imminent death: clinician certainty and accuracy of prognostic predictions.即将死亡:临床医生对预后预测的确定性和准确性。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Dec;12(e6):e785-e791. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001761. Epub 2019 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Subjective Probabilities in Household Surveys.家庭调查中的主观概率
Annu Rev Econom. 2009 Jun 1;1:543-562. doi: 10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.142955.
2
Eliciting Subjective Probabilities in Internet Surveys.在互联网调查中引出主观概率
Public Opin Q. 2008 Dec 1;72(5):866-891. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn062.
3
Rounding Probabilistic Expectations in Surveys.调查中的概率期望四舍五入
J Bus Econ Stat. 2010 Apr 1;28(2):219-231. doi: 10.1198/jbes.2009.08098.
5
Can adolescents predict significant life events?青少年能预测重大生活事件吗?
J Adolesc Health. 2007 Aug;41(2):208-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.03.014.
6
Numeracy and decision making.算术能力与决策制定。
Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):407-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x.
9
Teen expectations for significant life events.青少年对重大人生事件的期望。
Public Opin Q. 2000 Summer;64(2):189-205. doi: 10.1086/317762.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验