• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线心力衰竭信息的质量与健康素养需求

Quality and Health Literacy Demand of Online Heart Failure Information.

作者信息

Cajita Maan Isabella, Rodney Tamar, Xu Jingzhi, Hladek Melissa, Han Hae-Ra

机构信息

Maan Isabella Cajita, BSN, RN-BC PhD Candidate, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Tamar Rodney, MSN, RN PhD Student, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Jingzhi Xu, BSN, RN PhD Student, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Melissa Hladek, MSN, RN PhD Student, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Hae-Ra Han, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):156-164. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000324.

DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000324
PMID:26938508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5010526/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ubiquity of the Internet is changing the way people obtain their health information. Although there is an abundance of heart failure information online, the quality and health literacy demand of these information are still unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality and health literacy demand (readability, understandability, and actionability) of the heart failure information found online.

METHODS

Google, Yahoo, Bing, Ask.com, and DuckDuckGo were searched for relevant heart failure Web sites. Two independent raters then assessed the quality and health literacy demand of the included Web sites. The quality of the heart failure information was assessed using the DISCERN instrument. Readability was assessed using 7 established readability tests. Finally, understandability and actionability were assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Print Materials.

RESULTS

A total of 46 Web sites were included in this analysis. The overall mean quality rating was 46.0 ± 8.9 and the mean readability score was 12.6 grade reading level. The overall mean understandability score was 56.3% ± 16.2%. Finally, the overall mean actionability score was 34.7% ± 28.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

The heart failure information found online was of fair quality but required a relatively high health literacy level. Web content authors need to consider not just the quality but also the health literacy demand of the information found in their Web sites. This is especially important considering that low health literacy is likely prevalent among the usual audience.

摘要

背景

互联网的普及正在改变人们获取健康信息的方式。尽管网上有大量关于心力衰竭的信息,但这些信息的质量以及对健康素养的要求仍不明确。

目的

本研究旨在评估网上获取的心力衰竭信息的质量以及对健康素养的要求(可读性、可理解性和可操作性)。

方法

在谷歌、雅虎、必应、Ask.com和DuckDuckGo上搜索相关的心力衰竭网站。然后由两名独立的评估者评估纳入网站的质量和对健康素养的要求。使用DISCERN工具评估心力衰竭信息的质量。使用7种既定的可读性测试评估可读性。最后,使用印刷材料患者教育材料评估工具评估可理解性和可操作性。

结果

本分析共纳入46个网站。总体平均质量评分为46.0±8.9,平均可读性得分为12.6年级阅读水平。总体平均可理解性得分为56.3%±16.2%。最后,总体平均可操作性得分为34.7%±28.7%。

结论

网上找到的心力衰竭信息质量尚可,但需要相对较高的健康素养水平。网站内容作者不仅要考虑信息的质量,还要考虑其网站上信息对健康素养的要求。鉴于普通受众中低健康素养可能很普遍,这一点尤为重要。

相似文献

1
Quality and Health Literacy Demand of Online Heart Failure Information.在线心力衰竭信息的质量与健康素养需求
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):156-164. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000324.
2
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
3
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
4
Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Assessment of Online Patient Education Resources.全膝关节置换术:在线患者教育资源的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2022;42(2):98-106.
5
Investigation of the quality and health literacy demand of online information on pelvic floor exercises to reduce stress urinary incontinence.关于盆底肌锻炼以减轻压力性尿失禁的在线信息的质量及健康素养需求调查。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;64(6):542-547. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13830. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
6
Evaluating the health literacy demand and cultural appropriateness of online immunisation information available to refugee and migrant communities in Australia.评估澳大利亚难民和移民社区可获取的在线免疫信息的健康素养需求和文化适宜性。
Vaccine. 2020 Sep 22;38(41):6410-6417. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.071. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
7
Readibility, Understandability, and Quality of Online Education Materials for Vocal Fold Nodules.声带小结的在线教育材料的可读性、可理解性和质量。
J Voice. 2020 Mar;34(2):302.e15-302.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
8
Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.向谷歌医生咨询:关于鼓膜置管术的在线资源质量
Laryngoscope. 2018 Feb;128(2):496-501. doi: 10.1002/lary.26824. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
9
Assessment of Online Patient Education Material About Dysphagia.评估关于吞咽困难的在线患者教育材料。
Dysphagia. 2023 Jun;38(3):990-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10524-3. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
10
Readability and Understandability Analysis of Online Materials Related to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.腹主动脉瘤修复相关在线材料的可读性和可理解性分析
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2020 Feb;54(2):111-117. doi: 10.1177/1538574419879855. Epub 2019 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the understandability and actionability of Japanese human papillomavirus vaccination educational materials on cervical cancer.评估日本宫颈癌人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种教育材料的易懂性和可操作性。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf034.
2
Quality Analysis of Online Resources for Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者在线资源的质量分析
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Feb 1;2(3):331-335. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2023.12.021. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Assessing the understandability and actionability of online resources for patients undergoing hemodialysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to IR.与介入放射学相关的在线患者教育材料的可读性
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
2
Online Patient Resources for Liposuction: A Comparative Analysis of Readability.抽脂手术的在线患者资源:可读性比较分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Mar;76(3):349-54. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000438.
3
Readability of Written Materials for CKD Patients: A Systematic Review.CKD 患者阅读材料的易读性:系统评价。
评估针对接受血液透析患者的在线资源的可理解性和可操作性。
Ther Apher Dial. 2025 Apr;29(2):200-209. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.14221. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
4
Online resources as a source of information for exercise and physical activity in solid organ transplant recipients.在线资源作为实体器官移植受者运动和体育活动信息的来源。
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Apr 30;6:1353663. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1353663. eCollection 2024.
5
Investigation of the quality and health literacy demand of online information on pelvic floor exercises to reduce stress urinary incontinence.关于盆底肌锻炼以减轻压力性尿失禁的在线信息的质量及健康素养需求调查。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;64(6):542-547. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13830. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
6
A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Health Information on Cleft Lip and Palate in the Arabic Language.阿拉伯语腭裂唇裂健康信息质量的系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Feb 27;12(2):e5604. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005604. eCollection 2024 Feb.
7
Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Aortic Stenosis? A Pilot Study.人工智能能否提高主动脉瓣狭窄患者教育材料的可读性?一项试点研究。
Cardiol Ther. 2024 Mar;13(1):137-147. doi: 10.1007/s40119-023-00347-0. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
8
Web-Based Nutrition and Physical Activity Education Intervention to Ameliorate Cardiometabolic Risks: A Single-Arm and Non-Randomized Feasibility Study.基于网络的营养与身体活动教育干预改善心血管代谢风险:一项单臂非随机可行性研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231214091. doi: 10.1177/21501319231214091.
9
Evaluating the understandability and actionability of online CKD educational materials.评估在线慢性肾脏病教育资料的易懂性和可操作性。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2024 Jan;28(1):31-39. doi: 10.1007/s10157-023-02401-6. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
10
Evidence-based health information about pulmonary embolism: Assessing the quality, usability and readability of online and offline patient information.关于肺栓塞的循证健康信息:评估在线和离线患者信息的质量、可用性及可读性。
PEC Innov. 2022 Nov 15;1:100103. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100103. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jun;65(6):842-50. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.025. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
4
The quality and readability of online consumer information about gynecologic cancer.关于妇科癌症的在线消费者信息的质量和可读性。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Mar;25(3):537-41. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000362.
5
Health Literacy and Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.健康素养与心力衰竭:一项系统综述。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):121-30. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000229.
6
Evaluating the usefulness of patient education materials on surgical site infection: a systematic assessment.评估患者教育材料对手术部位感染的有用性:一项系统评估。
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Feb;43(2):167-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
7
Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.证据何在?共享决策制定与患者预后的系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):114-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551638. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
8
Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information.患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)的开发:一种针对印刷和视听患者信息的可理解性和可操作性的新测量方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
9
A comparative analysis of minimally invasive and open spine surgery patient education resources.微创与开放脊柱手术患者教育资源的比较分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Sep;21(3):468-74. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.SPINE13600. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
10
Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.基于网络的结直肠癌筛查患者教育材料的可读性、适宜性和健康内容评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Mar 25.