• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Valx: A System for Extracting and Structuring Numeric Lab Test Comparison Statements from Text.Valx:一个用于从文本中提取和构建数字实验室检查比较语句的系统。
Methods Inf Med. 2016 May 17;55(3):266-75. doi: 10.3414/ME15-01-0112. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
2
Short-term intensive insulin therapy could be the preferred option for new onset Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with HbA1c > 9.对于新诊断的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>9%的 2 型糖尿病患者,短期强化胰岛素治疗可能是首选。
J Diabetes. 2017 Oct;9(10):890-893. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12581. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
3
BELMiner: adapting a rule-based relation extraction system to extract biological expression language statements from bio-medical literature evidence sentences.BELMiner:调整基于规则的关系提取系统,以从生物医学文献证据句子中提取生物表达语言陈述。
Database (Oxford). 2017 Jan 1;2017(1). doi: 10.1093/database/baw156.
4
Knowledge Author: facilitating user-driven, domain content development to support clinical information extraction.知识作者:促进用户驱动的领域内容开发,以支持临床信息提取。
J Biomed Semantics. 2016 Jun 23;7(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13326-016-0086-9.
5
[A customized method for information extraction from unstructured text data in the electronic medical records].[一种从电子病历非结构化文本数据中提取信息的定制方法]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Apr 18;50(2):256-263.
6
Treatment of periodontal disease for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者控制血糖的牙周疾病治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 6;2015(11):CD004714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004714.pub3.
7
Using data-driven sublanguage pattern mining to induce knowledge models: application in medical image reports knowledge representation.利用数据驱动的子语言模式挖掘来诱导知识模型:在医学图像报告知识表示中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0645-3.
8
A human-computer collaborative approach to identifying common data elements in clinical trial eligibility criteria.一种人机协作的方法,用于识别临床试验入选标准中的常见数据元素。
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Feb;46(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
9
Enhancing reuse of structured eligibility criteria and supporting their relaxation.加强结构化资格标准的复用并支持其放宽。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Aug;56:205-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 23.
10
EliXR: an approach to eligibility criteria extraction and representation.EliXR:一种资格标准提取和表示方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i116-24. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000321. Epub 2011 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Parsing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria for Cohort Query by a Multi-Input Multi-Output Sequence Labeling Model.通过多输入多输出序列标注模型解析队列查询的临床试验资格标准。
Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed). 2023 Dec;2023:4426-4430. doi: 10.1109/bibm58861.2023.10385876. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
ELaPro, a LOINC-mapped core dataset for top laboratory procedures of eligibility screening for clinical trials.ELaPro,一个 LOINC 映射的核心数据集,用于临床试验资格筛选的顶级实验室程序。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 14;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01611-y.
3
Combining human and machine intelligence for clinical trial eligibility querying.结合人类与机器智能进行临床试验资格查询。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1161-1171. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac051.
4
Transformer-Based Named Entity Recognition for Parsing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria.基于Transformer的用于解析临床试验资格标准的命名实体识别
ACM BCB. 2021 Aug;2021. doi: 10.1145/3459930.3469560.
5
How the clinical research community responded to the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of the COVID-19 clinical studies in ClinicalTrials.gov.临床研究界如何应对新冠疫情:对ClinicalTrials.gov上新冠临床研究的分析
JAMIA Open. 2021 Apr 20;4(2):ooab032. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab032. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Retrieving Lab Test Related Questions from Social Q&A Sites by Combining Shallow Features and Deep Representations.通过浅层特征和深度表示相结合从社交问答网站中检索与实验室测试相关的问题
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:783-792. eCollection 2020.
7
Using Natural Language Processing to Measure and Improve Quality of Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review.使用自然语言处理技术衡量和改善糖尿病护理质量:系统评价。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 May;15(3):553-560. doi: 10.1177/19322968211000831. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
8
How the clinical research community responded to the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the COVID-19 clinical studies in ClinicalTrials.gov.临床研究界如何应对新冠疫情:对ClinicalTrials.gov上新冠临床研究的分析
medRxiv. 2020 Dec 15:2020.09.16.20195552. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.16.20195552.
9
DQueST: dynamic questionnaire for search of clinical trials.DQueST:用于临床试验搜索的动态问卷。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):1333-1343. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz121.
10
Comparing the Study Populations in Dietary Supplement and Drug Clinical Trials for Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders.比较膳食补充剂与药物治疗代谢综合征及相关疾病临床试验中的研究人群。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019 May 6;2019:799-808. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Case-based reasoning using electronic health records efficiently identifies eligible patients for clinical trials.使用电子健康记录的基于案例的推理能够有效地识别出符合临床试验条件的患者。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Apr;22(e1):e141-50. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu050. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
2
Visual aggregate analysis of eligibility features of clinical trials.临床试验合格特征的可视化综合分析。
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Apr;54:241-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
3
Adaptive semantic tag mining from heterogeneous clinical research texts.从异构临床研究文本中进行自适应语义标签挖掘。
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(2):164-70. doi: 10.3414/ME13-01-0130. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
4
A distribution-based method for assessing the differences between clinical trial target populations and patient populations in electronic health records.一种基于分布的方法,用于评估电子健康记录中的临床试验目标人群和患者人群之间的差异。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 May 7;5(2):463-79. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2013-12-RA-0105. eCollection 2014.
5
An eligibility criteria query language for heterogeneous data warehouses.一种用于异构数据仓库的合格标准查询语言。
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(1):41-4. doi: 10.3414/ME13-02-0027. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
6
Towards symbiosis in knowledge representation and natural language processing for structuring clinical practice guidelines.迈向知识表示与自然语言处理中的共生关系以构建临床实践指南
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;201:461-9.
7
Clustering clinical trials with similar eligibility criteria features.对具有相似纳入标准特征的临床试验进行聚类。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
8
eTACTS: a method for dynamically filtering clinical trial search results.eTACTS:一种动态筛选临床试验搜索结果的方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Dec;46(6):1060-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
9
Feasibility of feature-based indexing, clustering, and search of clinical trials. A case study of breast cancer trials from ClinicalTrials.gov.基于特征的临床试验索引、聚类和搜索的可行性。以ClinicalTrials.gov上的乳腺癌试验为例。
Methods Inf Med. 2013;52(5):382-94. doi: 10.3414/ME12-01-0092. Epub 2013 May 13.
10
A practical method for transforming free-text eligibility criteria into computable criteria.一种将自由文本资格标准转化为可计算标准的实用方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Apr;44(2):239-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Sep 17.

Valx:一个用于从文本中提取和构建数字实验室检查比较语句的系统。

Valx: A System for Extracting and Structuring Numeric Lab Test Comparison Statements from Text.

作者信息

Hao Tianyong, Liu Hongfang, Weng Chunhua

机构信息

Chunhua Weng, Ph.D., Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York City, 622 W 168th Street, PH-20, New York, NY 10032, USA, E-mail:

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 2016 May 17;55(3):266-75. doi: 10.3414/ME15-01-0112. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

DOI:10.3414/ME15-01-0112
PMID:26940748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5573874/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop an automated method for extracting and structuring numeric lab test comparison statements from text and evaluate the method using clinical trial eligibility criteria text.

METHODS

Leveraging semantic knowledge from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) and domain knowledge acquired from the Internet, Valx takes seven steps to extract and normalize numeric lab test expressions: 1) text preprocessing, 2) numeric, unit, and comparison operator extraction, 3) variable identification using hybrid knowledge, 4) variable - numeric association, 5) context-based association filtering, 6) measurement unit normalization, and 7) heuristic rule-based comparison statements verification. Our reference standard was the consensus-based annotation among three raters for all comparison statements for two variables, i.e., HbA1c and glucose, identified from all of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes trials in ClinicalTrials.gov.

RESULTS

The precision, recall, and F-measure for structuring HbA1c comparison statements were 99.6%, 98.1%, 98.8% for Type 1 diabetes trials, and 98.8%, 96.9%, 97.8% for Type 2 diabetes trials, respectively. The precision, recall, and F-measure for structuring glucose comparison statements were 97.3%, 94.8%, 96.1% for Type 1 diabetes trials, and 92.3%, 92.3%, 92.3% for Type 2 diabetes trials, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Valx is effective at extracting and structuring free-text lab test comparison statements in clinical trial summaries. Future studies are warranted to test its generalizability beyond eligibility criteria text. The open-source Valx enables its further evaluation and continued improvement among the collaborative scientific community.

摘要

目的

开发一种从文本中提取并构建数字实验室检查比较语句的自动化方法,并使用临床试验入选标准文本对该方法进行评估。

方法

Valx利用统一医学语言系统(UMLS)的语义知识和从互联网获取的领域知识,通过七个步骤来提取和规范化数字实验室检查表达式:1)文本预处理;2)数字、单位和比较运算符提取;3)使用混合知识进行变量识别;4)变量与数字关联;5)基于上下文的关联过滤;6)测量单位规范化;7)基于启发式规则的比较语句验证。我们的参考标准是由三名评分者对从ClinicalTrials.gov中所有1型和2型糖尿病试验中识别出的两个变量(即糖化血红蛋白和葡萄糖)的所有比较语句达成的基于共识的注释。

结果

构建糖化血红蛋白比较语句时,1型糖尿病试验的精确率、召回率和F值分别为99.6%、98.1%、98.8%,2型糖尿病试验分别为98.8%、96.9%、97.8%。构建葡萄糖比较语句时,1型糖尿病试验的精确率、召回率和F值分别为97.3%、94.8%、96.1%,2型糖尿病试验分别为92.3%、92.3%、92.3%。

结论

Valx在提取和构建临床试验摘要中的自由文本实验室检查比较语句方面是有效的。未来有必要进行研究以测试其在入选标准文本之外的通用性。开源的Valx使其能够在合作科学界中得到进一步评估和持续改进。