Duhé Abby F, Gilmore L Anne, Burton Jeffrey H, Martin Corby K, Redman Leanne M
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Jul;116(7):1172-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
Infant formula is a major source of nutrition for infants, with more than half of all infants in the United States consuming infant formula exclusively or in combination with breast milk. The energy in infant powdered formula is derived from the powder and not the water, making it necessary to develop methods that can accurately estimate the amount of powder used before reconstitution.
Our aim was to assess the use of the Remote Food Photography Method to accurately estimate the weight of infant powdered formula before reconstitution among the standard serving sizes.
For each serving size (1 scoop, 2 scoops, 3 scoops, and 4 scoops), a set of seven test bottles and photographs were prepared as follow: recommended gram weight of powdered formula of the respective serving size by the manufacturer; three bottles and photographs containing 15%, 10%, and 5% less powdered formula than recommended; and three bottles and photographs containing 5%, 10%, and 15% more powdered formula than recommended (n=28). Ratio estimates of the test photographs as compared to standard photographs were obtained using standard Remote Food Photography Method analysis procedures. The ratio estimates and the US Department of Agriculture data tables were used to generate food and nutrient information to provide the Remote Food Photography Method estimates.
Equivalence testing using the two one-sided t tests approach was used to determine equivalence between the actual gram weights and the Remote Food Photography Method estimated weights for all samples, within each serving size, and within underprepared and overprepared bottles.
For all bottles, the gram weights estimated by the Remote Food Photography Method were within 5% equivalence bounds with a slight underestimation of 0.05 g (90% CI -0.49 to 0.40; P<0.001) and mean percent error ranging between 0.32% and 1.58% among the four serving sizes.
The maximum observed mean error was an overestimation of 1.58% of powdered formula by the Remote Food Photography Method under controlled laboratory conditions, indicating that the Remote Food Photography Method accurately estimated infant powdered formula.
婴儿配方奶粉是婴儿的主要营养来源,美国超过一半的婴儿完全食用婴儿配方奶粉或同时食用母乳和配方奶粉。婴儿配方奶粉中的能量来自奶粉而非水,因此有必要开发能够准确估计冲调前奶粉用量的方法。
我们的目的是评估远程食物摄影法在标准喂食量下准确估计婴儿配方奶粉冲调前重量的应用。
对于每种喂食量(1勺、2勺、3勺和4勺),准备一组七个测试瓶和照片,具体如下:制造商推荐的各喂食量配方奶粉的克重;三个装有比推荐量少15%、10%和5%配方奶粉的瓶子及照片;以及三个装有比推荐量多5%、10%和15%配方奶粉的瓶子及照片(n = 28)。使用标准的远程食物摄影法分析程序获得测试照片与标准照片的比率估计值。比率估计值和美国农业部数据表用于生成食物和营养信息,以提供远程食物摄影法的估计值。
使用双侧t检验方法进行等效性测试,以确定所有样本、每种喂食量内以及准备不足和准备过量的瓶子中实际克重与远程食物摄影法估计重量之间的等效性。
对于所有瓶子,远程食物摄影法估计的克重在5%等效范围内,略有低估0.05克(90%置信区间-0.49至0.40;P<0.001),四种喂食量的平均百分比误差在0.32%至1.58%之间。
在受控实验室条件下,远程食物摄影法观察到的最大平均误差是对配方奶粉的高估1.58%,这表明远程食物摄影法能够准确估计婴儿配方奶粉的重量。