Hsu Nina S, Novick Jared M
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences Center for Advanced Study of Language Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences Center for Advanced Study of Language Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science.
Psychol Sci. 2016 Apr;27(4):572-82. doi: 10.1177/0956797615625223. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
Speech unfolds swiftly, yet listeners keep pace by rapidly assigning meaning to what they hear. Sometimes, though, initial interpretations turn out to be wrong. How do listeners revise misinterpretations of language input moment by moment to avoid comprehension errors? Cognitive control may play a role by detecting when processing has gone awry and then initiating behavioral adjustments accordingly. However, no research to date has investigated a cause-and-effect interplay between cognitive-control engagement and the overriding of erroneous interpretations in real time. Using a novel cross-task paradigm, we showed that Stroop-conflict detection, which mobilizes cognitive-control procedures, subsequently facilitates listeners' incremental processing of temporarily ambiguous spoken instructions that induce brief misinterpretation. When instructions followed incongruent Stroop items, compared with congruent Stroop items, listeners' eye movements to objects in a scene reflected more transient consideration of the false interpretation and earlier recovery of the correct one. Comprehension errors also decreased. Cognitive-control engagement therefore accelerates sentence-reinterpretation processes, even as linguistic input is still unfolding.
言语展开迅速,但听众通过迅速为所听到的内容赋予意义来跟上节奏。然而,有时最初的解释结果是错误的。听众如何时刻修正对语言输入的错误解读以避免理解错误呢?认知控制可能通过检测处理何时出错,然后相应地启动行为调整来发挥作用。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究调查认知控制参与和实时推翻错误解读之间的因果相互作用。使用一种新颖的跨任务范式,我们表明,调动认知控制程序的斯特鲁普冲突检测随后促进了听众对导致短暂错误解读的临时模糊口语指令的渐进处理。当指令跟随不一致的斯特鲁普项目时,与一致的斯特鲁普项目相比,听众对场景中物体的眼动反映出对错误解释的短暂考虑更少,对正确解释的恢复更早。理解错误也减少了。因此,即使语言输入仍在展开,认知控制的参与也会加速句子重新解释的过程。