• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial.舒尼替尼或索拉非尼辅助治疗高危、非转移性肾细胞癌(ECOG-ACRIN E2805):一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机3期试验。
Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):2008-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00559-6. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
2
Adjuvant Treatment for High-Risk Clear Cell Renal Cancer: Updated Results of a High-Risk Subset of the ASSURE Randomized Trial.辅助治疗高危透明细胞肾细胞癌:ASSURE 随机试验高危亚组的更新结果。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;3(9):1249-1252. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0076.
3
Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.索拉非尼辅助治疗肝细胞癌切除术后或消融后(STORM):一项 3 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1344-54. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00198-9. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
4
SWITCH: A Randomised, Sequential, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib-sunitinib Versus Sunitinib-sorafenib in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer.SWITCH 研究:比较索拉非尼-舒尼替尼与舒尼替尼-索拉非尼序贯治疗转移性肾细胞癌的随机、开放标签、连续研究
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):837-47. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 May 4.
5
Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial.阿昔替尼对比索拉非尼作为晚期肾细胞癌的二线治疗:一项随机 3 期临床试验的总生存分析及更新结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):552-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70093-7. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
6
Everolimus versus sunitinib for patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ASPEN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial.依维莫司对比舒尼替尼治疗转移性非透明细胞肾细胞癌患者(ASPEN):一项多中心、开放标签、随机2期试验
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):378-388. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00515-X. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
7
[Comparison of efficacy between sorafenib and sunitinib as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and analyze prognostic factors for survival].索拉非尼与舒尼替尼作为转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的疗效比较及生存预后因素分析
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018 May 23;40(5):384-389. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.05.012.
8
Adjuvant Sunitinib in High-Risk Renal-Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy.辅助舒尼替尼治疗肾切除术后高危肾细胞癌。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2246-2254. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611406. Epub 2016 Oct 9.
9
Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial.钇[90Y]树脂微球选择性内放射治疗与索拉非尼治疗局部进展期不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性比较(SARAH):一项开放标签随机对照 3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):1624-1636. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30683-6. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
10
Sorafenib or sunitinib as postoperative adjuvant therapy for Chinese patients with locally advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma at high risk for disease recurrence.索拉非尼或舒尼替尼作为术后辅助治疗用于有疾病复发高风险的中国局部进展期透明细胞肾细胞癌患者。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Nov;31(8):1800-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.04.019. Epub 2012 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma.肾细胞癌的免疫疗法
Cancer Treat Res. 2025;129:293-308. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-97242-3_13.
2
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) in Urological Cancers: A New Modern Era, but Not Generally Applied.泌尿系统癌症中的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI):一个新的现代时代,但尚未普遍应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 25;26(15):7194. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157194.
3
Radiomics-based tumor heterogeneity augments clinicopathological models for predicting recurrence in high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy.基于影像组学的肿瘤异质性增强了预测肾切除术后高危透明细胞肾细胞癌复发的临床病理模型。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05108-2.
4
Role of Systemic Therapy in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Heading?全身治疗在局限性肾细胞癌中的作用:我们现状如何,又将走向何方?
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 14;17(10):1656. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101656.
5
A prognostic microRNA-based signature for localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma: the Bio-miR study.一种用于局限性透明细胞肾细胞癌的基于预后微小RNA的特征:Bio-miR研究
Br J Cancer. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03008-2.
6
Advances in Adjuvant Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Perspectives on Risk Stratification and Treatment Outcomes.肾细胞癌辅助治疗的进展:风险分层与治疗结果的观点
Int J Urol. 2025 Jul;32(7):781-790. doi: 10.1111/iju.70050. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
7
Navigating advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of artificial intelligence.在人工智能时代应对晚期肾细胞癌
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00835-7.
8
The metastatic cascade through the lens of therapeutic inhibition.从治疗性抑制角度看转移级联反应。
Cell Rep Med. 2025 Jan 21;6(1):101872. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101872. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
9
Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): progress, at last.肾细胞癌的辅助治疗:终于取得进展。
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):6448-6462. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-2247. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
10
Perioperative systemic therapy in high-risk renal cell carcinoma following nephrectomy: a narrative review.肾切除术后高危肾细胞癌的围手术期全身治疗:一项叙述性综述
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):6511-6528. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-16. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Adjuvant Sorafenib and Sunitinib on Cardiac Function in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients without Overt Metastases: Results from ASSURE, ECOG 2805.辅助性索拉非尼和舒尼替尼对无明显转移的肾细胞癌患者心脏功能的影响:ASSURE、ECOG 2805研究结果
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 15;21(18):4048-54. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0215. Epub 2015 May 12.
2
The great escape; the hallmarks of resistance to antiangiogenic therapy.大逃亡:抗血管生成治疗耐药的特征。
Pharmacol Rev. 2015;67(2):441-61. doi: 10.1124/pr.114.010215.
3
Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma: past, present, and future.肾细胞癌的辅助治疗:过去、现在与未来。
Oncologist. 2014 Aug;19(8):851-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0105. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
4
Pazopanib versus sunitinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.帕唑帕尼对比舒尼替尼用于转移性肾细胞癌。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 22;369(8):722-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303989.
5
Adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BEATRICE): primary results of a randomised, phase 3 trial.贝伐珠单抗辅助治疗三阴性乳腺癌(BEATRICE):一项随机、3 期试验的主要结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):933-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70335-8. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
6
Bevacizumab in stage II-III colon cancer: 5-year update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-08 trial.贝伐珠单抗在 II-III 期结肠癌中的应用:国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目 C-08 试验的 5 年更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):359-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.4711. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
7
Rapid angiogenesis onset after discontinuation of sunitinib treatment of renal cell carcinoma patients.舒尼替尼治疗肾癌患者停药后快速血管生成。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jul 15;18(14):3961-3971. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0002. Epub 2012 May 9.
8
Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial.阿昔替尼对比索拉非尼用于晚期肾细胞癌的疗效(AXIS):一项随机 3 期试验。
Lancet. 2011 Dec 3;378(9807):1931-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61613-9. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
9
Targeted therapy for advanced renal cell cancer (RCC): a Cochrane systematic review of published randomised trials.晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)的靶向治疗:一项对已发表随机试验的 Cochrane 系统评价。
BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108(10):1556-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10629.x. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
10
Hypertension as a biomarker of efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib.高血压作为舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者疗效的生物标志物。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 May 4;103(9):763-73. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr128. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

舒尼替尼或索拉非尼辅助治疗高危、非转移性肾细胞癌(ECOG-ACRIN E2805):一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机3期试验。

Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial.

作者信息

Haas Naomi B, Manola Judith, Uzzo Robert G, Flaherty Keith T, Wood Christopher G, Kane Christopher, Jewett Michael, Dutcher Janice P, Atkins Michael B, Pins Michael, Wilding George, Cella David, Wagner Lynne, Matin Surena, Kuzel Timothy M, Sexton Wade J, Wong Yu-Ning, Choueiri Toni K, Pili Roberto, Puzanov Igor, Kohli Manish, Stadler Walter, Carducci Michael, Coomes Robert, DiPaola Robert S

机构信息

Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):2008-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00559-6. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00559-6
PMID:26969090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4878938/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Renal-cell carcinoma is highly vascular, and proliferates primarily through dysregulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. We tested sunitinib and sorafenib, two oral anti-angiogenic agents that are effective in advanced renal-cell carcinoma, in patients with resected local disease at high risk for recurrence.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients at 226 study centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients had pathological stage high-grade T1b or greater with completely resected non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and adequate cardiac, renal, and hepatic function. Patients were stratified by recurrence risk, histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and surgical approach, and computerised double-blind randomisation was done centrally with permuted blocks. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 54 weeks of sunitinib 50 mg per day orally throughout the first 4 weeks of each 6 week cycle, sorafenib 400 mg twice per day orally throughout each cycle, or placebo. Placebo could be sunitinib placebo given continuously for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle or sorafenib placebo given twice per day throughout the study. The primary objective was to compare disease-free survival between each experimental group and placebo in the intention-to-treat population. All treated patients with at least one follow-up assessment were included in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00326898.

FINDINGS

Between April 24, 2006, and Sept 1, 2010, 1943 patients from the National Clinical Trials Network were randomly assigned to sunitinib (n=647), sorafenib (n=649), or placebo (n=647). Following high rates of toxicity-related discontinuation after 1323 patients had enrolled (treatment discontinued by 193 [44%] of 438 patients on sunitinib, 199 [45%] of 441 patients on sorafenib), the starting dose of each drug was reduced and then individually titrated up to the original full doses. On Oct 16, 2014, because of low conditional power for the primary endpoint, the ECOG-ACRIN Data Safety Monitoring Committee recommended that blinded follow-up cease and the results be released. The primary analysis showed no significant differences in disease-free survival. Median disease-free survival was 5·8 years (IQR 1·6-8·2) for sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR] 1·02, 97·5% CI 0·85-1·23, p=0·8038), 6·1 years (IQR 1·7-not estimable [NE]) for sorafenib (HR 0·97, 97·5% CI 0·80-1·17, p=0·7184), and 6·6 years (IQR 1·5-NE) for placebo. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (105 [17%] patients on sunitinib and 102 [16%] patients on sorafenib), hand-foot syndrome (94 [15%] patients on sunitinib and 208 [33%] patients on sorafenib), rash (15 [2%] patients on sunitinib and 95 [15%] patients on sorafenib), and fatigue 110 [18%] patients on sunitinib [corrected]. There were five deaths related to treatment or occurring within 30 days of the end of treatment; one patient receiving sorafenib died from infectious colitis while on treatment and four patients receiving sunitinib died, with one death due to each of neurological sequelae, sequelae of gastric perforation, pulmonary embolus, and disease progression. Revised dosing still resulted in high toxicity.

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant treatment with the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib or sunitinib showed no survival benefit relative to placebo in a definitive phase 3 study. Furthermore, substantial treatment discontinuation occurred because of excessive toxicity, despite dose reductions. These results provide a strong rationale against the use of these drugs for high-risk kidney cancer in the adjuvant setting and suggest that the biology of cancer recurrence might be independent of angiogenesis.

FUNDING

US National Cancer Institute and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, Pfizer, and Bayer.

摘要

背景

肾细胞癌血管丰富,主要通过血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)途径失调而增殖。我们对舒尼替尼和索拉非尼这两种对晚期肾细胞癌有效的口服抗血管生成药物,在具有高复发风险的局部切除疾病患者中进行了测试。

方法

在这项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机3期试验中,我们在美国和加拿大的226个研究中心招募患者。符合条件的患者为病理分期为高级别T1b或更高,非转移性肾细胞癌已完全切除且心脏、肾脏和肝功能良好。患者按复发风险、组织学、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态和手术方式分层,并通过中心计算机化双盲随机分组,采用置换区组法。患者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受在每6周周期的前4周每天口服50mg舒尼替尼共54周、在每个周期每天口服400mg索拉非尼两次或安慰剂。安慰剂可以是每6周周期连续4周给予的舒尼替尼安慰剂,或在整个研究期间每天给予两次的索拉非尼安慰剂。主要目的是在意向性治疗人群中比较各试验组与安慰剂组的无病生存期。所有接受至少一次随访评估的治疗患者均纳入安全性分析。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT00326898。

结果

在2006年4月24日至2010年9月1日期间,来自国家临床试验网络的1943例患者被随机分配至舒尼替尼组(n = 647)、索拉非尼组(n = 649)或安慰剂组(n = 647)。在1323例患者入组后出现了与毒性相关的高停药率(舒尼替尼组438例患者中有193例[44%]停药,索拉非尼组441例患者中有199例[45%]停药),每种药物的起始剂量均降低,然后分别滴定至原全剂量。2014年10月16日,由于主要终点的条件把握度较低,ECOG - ACRIN数据安全监测委员会建议停止盲法随访并公布结果。主要分析显示无病生存期无显著差异。舒尼替尼组的中位无病生存期为5.8年(IQR 1.6 - 8.2)(风险比[HR] 1.02,97.5%CI 0.85 - 1.23,p = 0.8038),索拉非尼组为6.1年(IQR 1.7 - 不可估计[NE])(HR 0.97,97.5%CI 0.80 - 1.17,p = 0.7184),安慰剂组为6.6年(IQR 1.5 - NE)。最常见的3级或更严重不良事件为高血压(舒尼替尼组105例[17%]患者,索拉非尼组102例[16%]患者)、手足综合征(舒尼替尼组94例[15%]患者,索拉非尼组208例[33%]患者)、皮疹(舒尼替尼组15例[2%]患者,索拉非尼组95例[15%]患者)以及疲劳(舒尼替尼组110例[18%]患者[校正后])。有5例死亡与治疗相关或在治疗结束后30天内发生;1例接受索拉非尼治疗的患者死于感染性结肠炎,4例接受舒尼替尼治疗的患者死亡,分别死于神经后遗症、胃穿孔后遗症、肺栓塞和疾病进展各1例。调整剂量后仍导致高毒性。

解读

在一项确定性3期研究中,VEGF受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂索拉非尼或舒尼替尼的辅助治疗相对于安慰剂未显示出生存获益。此外,尽管降低了剂量,但由于毒性过大仍发生了大量治疗中断。这些结果为在辅助治疗中使用这些药物治疗高危肾癌提供了有力的反对依据,并表明癌症复发的生物学机制可能与血管生成无关。

资助

美国国立癌症研究所、ECOG - ACRIN癌症研究组、辉瑞公司和拜耳公司。