Suppr超能文献

舒尼替尼或索拉非尼辅助治疗高危、非转移性肾细胞癌(ECOG-ACRIN E2805):一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机3期试验。

Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial.

作者信息

Haas Naomi B, Manola Judith, Uzzo Robert G, Flaherty Keith T, Wood Christopher G, Kane Christopher, Jewett Michael, Dutcher Janice P, Atkins Michael B, Pins Michael, Wilding George, Cella David, Wagner Lynne, Matin Surena, Kuzel Timothy M, Sexton Wade J, Wong Yu-Ning, Choueiri Toni K, Pili Roberto, Puzanov Igor, Kohli Manish, Stadler Walter, Carducci Michael, Coomes Robert, DiPaola Robert S

机构信息

Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):2008-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00559-6. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Renal-cell carcinoma is highly vascular, and proliferates primarily through dysregulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. We tested sunitinib and sorafenib, two oral anti-angiogenic agents that are effective in advanced renal-cell carcinoma, in patients with resected local disease at high risk for recurrence.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients at 226 study centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients had pathological stage high-grade T1b or greater with completely resected non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and adequate cardiac, renal, and hepatic function. Patients were stratified by recurrence risk, histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and surgical approach, and computerised double-blind randomisation was done centrally with permuted blocks. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 54 weeks of sunitinib 50 mg per day orally throughout the first 4 weeks of each 6 week cycle, sorafenib 400 mg twice per day orally throughout each cycle, or placebo. Placebo could be sunitinib placebo given continuously for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle or sorafenib placebo given twice per day throughout the study. The primary objective was to compare disease-free survival between each experimental group and placebo in the intention-to-treat population. All treated patients with at least one follow-up assessment were included in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00326898.

FINDINGS

Between April 24, 2006, and Sept 1, 2010, 1943 patients from the National Clinical Trials Network were randomly assigned to sunitinib (n=647), sorafenib (n=649), or placebo (n=647). Following high rates of toxicity-related discontinuation after 1323 patients had enrolled (treatment discontinued by 193 [44%] of 438 patients on sunitinib, 199 [45%] of 441 patients on sorafenib), the starting dose of each drug was reduced and then individually titrated up to the original full doses. On Oct 16, 2014, because of low conditional power for the primary endpoint, the ECOG-ACRIN Data Safety Monitoring Committee recommended that blinded follow-up cease and the results be released. The primary analysis showed no significant differences in disease-free survival. Median disease-free survival was 5·8 years (IQR 1·6-8·2) for sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR] 1·02, 97·5% CI 0·85-1·23, p=0·8038), 6·1 years (IQR 1·7-not estimable [NE]) for sorafenib (HR 0·97, 97·5% CI 0·80-1·17, p=0·7184), and 6·6 years (IQR 1·5-NE) for placebo. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (105 [17%] patients on sunitinib and 102 [16%] patients on sorafenib), hand-foot syndrome (94 [15%] patients on sunitinib and 208 [33%] patients on sorafenib), rash (15 [2%] patients on sunitinib and 95 [15%] patients on sorafenib), and fatigue 110 [18%] patients on sunitinib [corrected]. There were five deaths related to treatment or occurring within 30 days of the end of treatment; one patient receiving sorafenib died from infectious colitis while on treatment and four patients receiving sunitinib died, with one death due to each of neurological sequelae, sequelae of gastric perforation, pulmonary embolus, and disease progression. Revised dosing still resulted in high toxicity.

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant treatment with the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib or sunitinib showed no survival benefit relative to placebo in a definitive phase 3 study. Furthermore, substantial treatment discontinuation occurred because of excessive toxicity, despite dose reductions. These results provide a strong rationale against the use of these drugs for high-risk kidney cancer in the adjuvant setting and suggest that the biology of cancer recurrence might be independent of angiogenesis.

FUNDING

US National Cancer Institute and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, Pfizer, and Bayer.

摘要

背景

肾细胞癌血管丰富,主要通过血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)途径失调而增殖。我们对舒尼替尼和索拉非尼这两种对晚期肾细胞癌有效的口服抗血管生成药物,在具有高复发风险的局部切除疾病患者中进行了测试。

方法

在这项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机3期试验中,我们在美国和加拿大的226个研究中心招募患者。符合条件的患者为病理分期为高级别T1b或更高,非转移性肾细胞癌已完全切除且心脏、肾脏和肝功能良好。患者按复发风险、组织学、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态和手术方式分层,并通过中心计算机化双盲随机分组,采用置换区组法。患者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受在每6周周期的前4周每天口服50mg舒尼替尼共54周、在每个周期每天口服400mg索拉非尼两次或安慰剂。安慰剂可以是每6周周期连续4周给予的舒尼替尼安慰剂,或在整个研究期间每天给予两次的索拉非尼安慰剂。主要目的是在意向性治疗人群中比较各试验组与安慰剂组的无病生存期。所有接受至少一次随访评估的治疗患者均纳入安全性分析。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT00326898。

结果

在2006年4月24日至2010年9月1日期间,来自国家临床试验网络的1943例患者被随机分配至舒尼替尼组(n = 647)、索拉非尼组(n = 649)或安慰剂组(n = 647)。在1323例患者入组后出现了与毒性相关的高停药率(舒尼替尼组438例患者中有193例[44%]停药,索拉非尼组441例患者中有199例[45%]停药),每种药物的起始剂量均降低,然后分别滴定至原全剂量。2014年10月16日,由于主要终点的条件把握度较低,ECOG - ACRIN数据安全监测委员会建议停止盲法随访并公布结果。主要分析显示无病生存期无显著差异。舒尼替尼组的中位无病生存期为5.8年(IQR 1.6 - 8.2)(风险比[HR] 1.02,97.5%CI 0.85 - 1.23,p = 0.8038),索拉非尼组为6.1年(IQR 1.7 - 不可估计[NE])(HR 0.97,97.5%CI 0.80 - 1.17,p = 0.7184),安慰剂组为6.6年(IQR 1.5 - NE)。最常见的3级或更严重不良事件为高血压(舒尼替尼组105例[17%]患者,索拉非尼组102例[16%]患者)、手足综合征(舒尼替尼组94例[15%]患者,索拉非尼组208例[33%]患者)、皮疹(舒尼替尼组15例[2%]患者,索拉非尼组95例[15%]患者)以及疲劳(舒尼替尼组110例[18%]患者[校正后])。有5例死亡与治疗相关或在治疗结束后30天内发生;1例接受索拉非尼治疗的患者死于感染性结肠炎,4例接受舒尼替尼治疗的患者死亡,分别死于神经后遗症、胃穿孔后遗症、肺栓塞和疾病进展各1例。调整剂量后仍导致高毒性。

解读

在一项确定性3期研究中,VEGF受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂索拉非尼或舒尼替尼的辅助治疗相对于安慰剂未显示出生存获益。此外,尽管降低了剂量,但由于毒性过大仍发生了大量治疗中断。这些结果为在辅助治疗中使用这些药物治疗高危肾癌提供了有力的反对依据,并表明癌症复发的生物学机制可能与血管生成无关。

资助

美国国立癌症研究所、ECOG - ACRIN癌症研究组、辉瑞公司和拜耳公司。

相似文献

8
Adjuvant Sunitinib in High-Risk Renal-Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy.辅助舒尼替尼治疗肾切除术后高危肾细胞癌。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2246-2254. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611406. Epub 2016 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma.肾细胞癌的免疫疗法
Cancer Treat Res. 2025;129:293-308. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-97242-3_13.
8
The metastatic cascade through the lens of therapeutic inhibition.从治疗性抑制角度看转移级联反应。
Cell Rep Med. 2025 Jan 21;6(1):101872. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101872. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
9
Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC): progress, at last.肾细胞癌的辅助治疗:终于取得进展。
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):6448-6462. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-2247. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

3
Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma: past, present, and future.肾细胞癌的辅助治疗:过去、现在与未来。
Oncologist. 2014 Aug;19(8):851-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0105. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验