• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国各州点火联锁法对涉及酒精的撞车死亡事故的影响。

Impact of State Ignition Interlock Laws on Alcohol-Involved Crash Deaths in the United States.

作者信息

Kaufman Elinore J, Wiebe Douglas J

机构信息

Elinore J. Kaufman is a student with the Health Policy Program at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and a resident in the Department of Surgery at New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. Douglas J. Wiebe is with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology at the University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):865-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303058. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303058
PMID:26985604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4985097/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact on alcohol-involved crash deaths of universal ignition interlock requirements, which aim to prevent people convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol from driving while intoxicated.

METHODS

We used data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for 1999 to 2013. From 2004 to 2013, 18 states made interlocks mandatory for all drunk-driving convictions. We compared alcohol-involved crash deaths between 18 states with and 32 states without universal interlock requirements, accounting for state and year effects, and for clustering within states.

RESULTS

Policy impact was apparent 3 years after implementation. The adjusted rate of alcohol-involved crash deaths was 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.0, 5.4) per 100,000 in states with the universal interlock requirement, compared with 5.5 (95% CI = 5.48, 5.53) in states without, an absolute reduction of 0.8 (95% CI = 0.1, 1.5) deaths per 100,000 per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Requiring ignition interlocks for all drunk-driving convictions was associated with 15% fewer alcohol-involved crash deaths, compared with states with less-stringent requirements. Interlocks are a life-saving technology that merit wider use.

摘要

目的

研究通用点火联锁要求对涉及酒精的撞车死亡事故的影响,该要求旨在防止因酒后驾车被定罪的人在醉酒状态下驾驶。

方法

我们使用了美国国家公路交通安全管理局1999年至2013年的数据。从2004年到2013年,18个州对所有酒后驾车定罪实行联锁强制要求。我们比较了18个有通用联锁要求的州和32个没有通用联锁要求的州之间涉及酒精的撞车死亡情况,同时考虑了州和年份的影响以及州内的聚类情况。

结果

政策影响在实施3年后显现。有通用联锁要求的州每10万人中涉及酒精的撞车死亡调整率为4.7(95%置信区间[CI]=4.0,5.4),而没有该要求的州为5.5(95%CI=5.48,5.53),每年每10万人中绝对减少0.8(95%CI=0.1,1.5)例死亡。

结论

与要求不那么严格的州相比,对所有酒后驾车定罪要求安装点火联锁装置可使涉及酒精的撞车死亡事故减少15%。联锁装置是一种挽救生命的技术,值得更广泛地使用。

相似文献

1
Impact of State Ignition Interlock Laws on Alcohol-Involved Crash Deaths in the United States.美国各州点火联锁法对涉及酒精的撞车死亡事故的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):865-71. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303058. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
2
Ignition Interlock Laws: Effects on Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes, 1982-2013.点火联锁法律:对1982年至2013年致命机动车撞车事故的影响
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Apr;52(4):417-423. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.043. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
3
State alcohol ignition interlock laws and fatal crashes.州酒精点火联锁装置法律与致命车祸。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(8):589-592. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1984439. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
Attitudes toward mandatory ignition interlocks for all offenders convicted of driving while intoxicated.对所有因醉酒驾车而被定罪的罪犯强制安装点火联锁装置的态度。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
5
Effects of Washington State's alcohol ignition interlock laws on DUI recidivism: An update.华盛顿州酒精点火联锁法律对酒后驾车累犯的影响:最新情况
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(7):665-674. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1496426. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
6
Program design for incentivizing ignition interlock installation for alcohol-impaired drivers: The Ontario approach.针对酒精影响下的驾驶者激励安装点火联锁装置的项目设计:安大略省的方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt A):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
7
Alcohol ignition interlocks in all new vehicles: a broader perspective.所有新车配备酒精点火联锁装置:更广阔的视角。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(4):335-42. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.825042.
8
The alcohol interlock: an underutilized resource for predicting and controlling drunk drivers.酒精联锁装置:一种未得到充分利用的预测和控制酒后驾车者的资源。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Jan;4 Suppl 1:5-11. doi: 10.1080/1538-950391915740.
9
Washington State's alcohol ignition interlock law: effects on recidivism among first-time DUI offenders.华盛顿州的酒精点火锁法:对首次 DUI 犯罪者再犯率的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(3):215-29. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.708885.
10
An evaluation of Nova Scotia's alcohol ignition interlock program.对新斯科舍省酒精点火联锁装置计划的评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Mar;100:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.017. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Motor Vehicle Safety - Has Technology and Legislation Made a Difference?机动车安全——技术与立法带来改变了吗?
Curr Trauma Rep. 2025;11(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s40719-025-00282-6. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
Area-Level Social Determinants of Alcohol-Related Mortality: Knowledge Gaps and Implications for Community Health.地区层面的酒精相关死亡率的社会决定因素:知识差距及其对社区健康的影响。
Alcohol Res. 2024 Oct 31;44(1):06. doi: 10.35946/arcr.v44.1.06. eCollection 2024.
3
Car/Motorbike Drivers' Willingness to Use and to Pay for Alcohol Interlock in Taiwan.台湾汽车/摩托车驾驶者使用和付费安装酒精锁的意愿。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 2;18(21):11516. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111516.
4
Alcohol-impaired driving among adults-USA, 2014-2018.成年人酒后驾车-美国,2014-2018 年。
Inj Prev. 2022 Jun;28(3):211-217. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2021-044382. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
5
Alcohol and the Risk of Injury.酒精与伤害风险。
Nutrients. 2021 Aug 13;13(8):2777. doi: 10.3390/nu13082777.
6
Drink Driving as the Commonest Drug Driving-A Perspective from Europe.酒驾作为最常见的毒驾——来自欧洲的视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;17(24):9521. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249521.
7
The impact of interlock installation on driving behavior and drinking behavior related to driving.防篡改装置对与驾驶相关的驾驶行为和饮酒行为的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(7):419-424. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1802020. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
8
A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to reduce motor vehicle crashes and their injuries among the general and working populations.一项关于减少普通人群和工作人群机动车碰撞事故及其伤害的干预措施有效性的系统评价。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 May 4;42:e60. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2018.60. eCollection 2018.
9
Using Rural⁻Urban Continuum Codes (RUCCS) to Examine Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Crash Injury and Enforcement in New York State.利用城乡连续统一体代码(RUCCS)研究纽约州与酒精相关的机动车碰撞伤害和执法情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 15;16(8):1346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081346.
10
Alcohol-Related Risk of Driver Fatalities in Motor Vehicle Crashes: Comparing Data From 2007 and 2013-2014.酒精相关的机动车事故中驾驶员死亡风险:2007 年和 2013-2014 年数据比较。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Jul;79(4):547-552. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.547.

本文引用的文献

1
Diffusion of Impaired Driving Laws Among US States.美国各州酒后驾车法律的传播情况。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Sep;105(9):1893-900. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302670. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
2
Modeling the injury prevention impact of mandatory alcohol ignition interlock installation in all new US vehicles.模拟美国所有新车辆强制安装酒精点火联锁装置对预防伤害的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):1028-35. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302445. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
3
The effects of federal parity on substance use disorder treatment.联邦平价法案对物质使用障碍治疗的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(1):76-82.
4
CDC Grand Rounds: Evidence-based injury prevention.美国疾病控制与预防中心例会:循证伤害预防。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Jan 3;62(51-52):1048-50.
5
A new scale of the U.S. alcohol policy environment and its relationship to binge drinking.美国酒精政策环境新量表及其与狂饮的关系。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.015.
6
Effectiveness of ignition interlocks for preventing alcohol-impaired driving and alcohol-related crashes: a Community Guide systematic review.点火联锁装置预防酒后驾驶和与酒精相关碰撞的有效性:社区指南系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Mar;40(3):362-76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.012.
7
Effects of report cards on referral patterns to cardiac surgeons.报告卡对心脏外科医生转诊模式的影响。
J Health Econ. 2010 Sep;29(5):718-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
8
Attitudes toward in-vehicle advanced alcohol detection technology.对车载先进酒精检测技术的态度。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Apr;11(2):156-64. doi: 10.1080/15389580903515419.
9
Cost-benefit analysis of an alcohol ignition interlock for installation in all newly registered vehicles.对安装在所有新注册车辆上的酒精点火联锁装置进行成本效益分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Dec;10(6):528-37. doi: 10.1080/15389580903173706.
10
Interlocks for first offenders: effective?针对初犯者的连锁措施:有效吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2007 Dec;8(4):346-52. doi: 10.1080/15389580701598559.