Plötner Maria, Over Harriet, Carpenter Malinda, Tomasello Michael
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
University of York, York, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152001. eCollection 2016.
To date, developmental research on groups has focused mainly on in-group biases and intergroup relations. However, little is known about children's general understanding of social groups and their perceptions of different forms of group. In this study, 5- to 6-year-old children were asked to evaluate prototypes of four key types of groups: an intimacy group (friends), a task group (people who are collaborating), a social category (people who look alike), and a loose association (people who coincidently meet at a tram stop). In line with previous work with adults, the vast majority of children perceived the intimacy group, task group, and social category, but not the loose association, to possess entitativity, that is, to be a 'real group.' In addition, children evaluated group member properties, social relations, and social obligations differently in each type of group, demonstrating that young children are able to distinguish between different types of in-group relations. The origins of the general group typology used by adults thus appear early in development. These findings contribute to our knowledge about children's intuitive understanding of groups and group members' behavior.
迄今为止,关于群体的发展研究主要集中在内群体偏见和群体间关系上。然而,对于儿童对社会群体的一般理解以及他们对不同形式群体的认知却知之甚少。在本研究中,5至6岁的儿童被要求对四种关键类型群体的原型进行评估:亲密群体(朋友)、任务群体(合作的人)、社会类别(长相相似的人)以及松散关联群体(在电车站偶然相遇的人)。与先前针对成年人的研究一致,但绝大多数儿童认为亲密群体、任务群体和社会类别是“真实的群体”,具有实体性,而松散关联群体则不然。此外,儿童对每种类型群体中的群体成员属性、社会关系和社会义务的评价各不相同,这表明幼儿能够区分不同类型的内群体关系。因此,成年人使用的一般群体类型学在儿童早期就已出现。这些发现有助于我们了解儿童对群体以及群体成员行为的直观理解。