Petrunoff N, Wen L M, Rissel C
Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, Level 6, The Hub, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, Level 6, The Hub, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Health Promotion Service, Sydney Local Health District, Level 9, King Georg V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.
Public Health. 2016 Jun;135:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
To evaluate the effects of a three-year workplace travel plan intervention on increasing active travel to work.
A time-series study with staff was conducted in 2011 (n = 804), 2012 (n = 904), 2013 (n = 872) and 2014 (n = 687).
A travel plan was implemented at a large, outer-suburban worksite in Sydney, Australia. Implementation was assessed by reviewing annual reports including travel plan actions and their status. Annual cross-sectional on-line surveys assessed primary outcomes which included change in the proportion of staff travelling to work via active modes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.
Strategies to encourage active travel were partially implemented. An average survey response rate was 23% (n = 817). The proportion of staff travelling actively to work increased by 4%-6% across intervention years compared to the baseline, and this increase was significant in 2012 (P = 0.04) and 2013 (P = 0.003). Compared to baseline, after adjusting for distances staff lived from work staff had 33% (95% CI 1%-74%) greater odds of travelling to work via active modes in 2012, and 50% (95% CI 15%-96%) greater odds in 2013. There was no evidence of change in physical activity levels.
A workplace travel plan which only included strategies to encourage active travel to work achieved small but significant increases in active travel. Workplace travel plans appear to be a promising way to increase active travel to work.
评估一项为期三年的工作场所出行计划干预措施对增加上班时主动出行的效果。
于2011年（n = 804）、2012年（n = 904）、2013年（n = 872）和2014年（n = 687）对员工进行了一项时间序列研究。
在澳大利亚悉尼一个大型郊区工作场所实施了一项出行计划。通过审查年度报告（包括出行计划行动及其状态）来评估实施情况。年度横断面在线调查评估主要结果，其中包括通过主动出行方式上班的员工比例的变化。使用多变量逻辑回归来调整混杂因素。
鼓励主动出行的策略得到部分实施。平均调查回复率为23%（n = 817）。与基线相比，在干预年份中，主动上班的员工比例增加了4% - 6%，且这一增加在2012年（P = 0.04）和2013年（P = 0.003）具有统计学意义。与基线相比，在调整员工居住距离与工作地点的距离后，2012年员工通过主动出行方式上班的几率比基线高33%（95%置信区间1% - 74%），2013年高50%（95%置信区间15% - 96%）。没有证据表明身体活动水平发生变化。
一项仅包含鼓励主动上班策略的工作场所出行计划使主动出行有了虽小但显著的增加。工作场所出行计划似乎是增加主动上班出行的一种有前景的方式。
