Suppr超能文献

评估BeUpstanding冠军工具包测试版在减少工作场所久坐行为方面的可行性及前后影响评估:一项试点研究。

Assessing the Feasibility and Pre-Post Impact Evaluation of the Beta (Test) Version of the BeUpstanding Champion Toolkit in Reducing Workplace Sitting: Pilot Study.

作者信息

Healy Genevieve Nissa, Eakin Elizabeth G, Winkler Elisabeth Ah, Hadgraft Nyssa, Dunstan David W, Gilson Nicholas D, Goode Ana D

机构信息

School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2018 Aug 28;2(2):e17. doi: 10.2196/formative.9343.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Web-based, evidence-informed BeUpstanding Champion Toolkit was developed to provide employers (via a "train-the-champion approach") with resources and support to help in reducing prolonged sitting in their own desk-based workplace. As part of a five-phase research-to-dissemination process, this study reports on the evaluation of the beta (test) version of this toolkit (Phase 2).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to evaluate (1) the implementation of the toolkit by workplace champions and (2) the impact of the toolkit on sitting (primary outcome), standing, and moving; use of activity-promoting strategies; knowledge and attitudes; and indicators of health and work performance.

METHODS

An implementation study using a pre-post design was conducted in 7 desk-based workplaces in Australia (September 2015 to May 2016), with work teams (one per workplace) purposively recruited to ensure representation across a range of sectors (white- or blue-collar), organizational sizes (small or medium or large), and locations (metropolitan or regional). All staff within participating teams were invited to participate in the relevant toolkit activities. Implementation outcomes (time commitment required by champions and toolkit activities completed) were collected from each champion via telephone interviews. Changes in impact outcomes, measured via a Web-based questionnaire completed by employees at baseline and 3 months postimplementation, were assessed using mixed models, correcting for clustering.

RESULTS

Champions reported a 30-60 minutes per week time commitment to the toolkit activities. All teams formed a wellbeing committee and sent the staff surveys at both time points; most champions held a staff consultation workshop (6/7), identified team-level strategies within that workshop (5/7), used the communication resources provided within the toolkit (emails, posters; 6/7), and completed the action plan (5/7). In total, 52% (315 of ≈600) employees participated in at least one survey and 97 (16%) participated in both. At follow-up, there was a significant (P<.05) reduction in self-reported workplace sitting time compared to baseline (-6.3%, 95% CI -10.1 to -2.5; n=85) equating to ≈30 minutes per workday. Significant benefits were also observed for the use of activity-promoting strategies, with small, nonsignificant changes observed for knowledge and attitudes and indicators of health and work performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The beta version of the BeUpstanding Champion Toolkit was feasible to implement and effective in reducing self-reported workplace sitting across a broad range of desk-based workplaces. The next phase (Phase 3) will build on these findings to optimize the toolkit for wider-scale implementation and longer term evaluation.

摘要

背景

基于网络的、循证的“站起来”冠军工具包旨在通过“培训冠军方法”为雇主提供资源和支持,以帮助减少其伏案工作场所的久坐时间。作为一个五阶段研究到传播过程的一部分,本研究报告了该工具包测试(β)版本的评估情况(第二阶段)。

目的

我们研究的目的是评估(1)工作场所冠军对工具包的实施情况,以及(2)该工具包对久坐(主要结果)、站立和活动的影响;促进活动策略的使用;知识和态度;以及健康和工作绩效指标。

方法

采用前后设计的实施研究在澳大利亚的7个伏案工作场所进行(2015年9月至2016年5月),有目的地招募工作团队(每个工作场所一个),以确保涵盖一系列部门(白领或蓝领)、组织规模(小、中或大)和地点(大都市或地区)。参与团队的所有员工都被邀请参加相关的工具包活动。通过电话访谈从每个冠军那里收集实施结果(冠军所需的时间投入和完成的工具包活动)。通过员工在基线和实施后3个月完成的基于网络的问卷来衡量的影响结果的变化,使用混合模型进行评估,并对聚类进行校正。

结果

冠军们报告每周对工具包活动投入30 - 60分钟。所有团队都成立了健康委员会,并在两个时间点发送了员工调查问卷;大多数冠军举办了员工咨询研讨会(6/7),在该研讨会上确定了团队层面的策略(5/7),使用了工具包中提供的沟通资源(电子邮件、海报;6/7),并完成了行动计划(5/7)。总共有52%(约600人中的315人)的员工至少参加了一次调查,97人(16%)参加了两次。在随访时,与基线相比,自我报告的工作场所久坐时间显著减少(P <.05)(-6.3%,95%置信区间 -10.1至 -2.5;n = 85),相当于每个工作日约30分钟。在促进活动策略的使用方面也观察到了显著益处,在知识和态度以及健康和工作绩效指标方面观察到了小的、不显著的变化。

结论

“站起来”冠军工具包的测试版本在广泛的伏案工作场所实施是可行的,并且在减少自我报告的工作场所久坐时间方面是有效的。下一阶段(第三阶段)将基于这些发现对工具包进行优化,以进行更广泛的实施和长期评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab92/6334681/fa5329a3055c/formative_v2i2e17_fig1.jpg

相似文献

3
National implementation trial of BeUpstanding™: an online initiative for workers to sit less and move more.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 30;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01652-0.
4
Perceptions of an online 'train-the-champion' approach to increase workplace movement.
Health Promot Int. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):1179-1190. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day092.
7
The BeUpstanding Program™: Scaling up the Workplace Intervention for Translation into Practice.
AIMS Public Health. 2016 May 30;3(2):341-347. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.2.341. eCollection 2016.
10
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3.

引用本文的文献

2
National implementation trial of BeUpstanding™: an online initiative for workers to sit less and move more.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 30;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01652-0.
3
What it takes to reduce sitting at work: a pilot study on the effectiveness and correlates of a multicomponent intervention.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024 Jan;97(1):9-21. doi: 10.1007/s00420-023-02020-4. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
4
Applying a User Centred Design Approach to Optimise a Workplace Initiative for Wide-Scale Implementation.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8096. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138096.
9
Evaluation of a Workplace Health and Wellbeing Training Course Delivered Online and Face-To-Face.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 31;15(11):2422. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112422.

本文引用的文献

1
The BeUpstanding Program™: Scaling up the Workplace Intervention for Translation into Practice.
AIMS Public Health. 2016 May 30;3(2):341-347. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.2.341. eCollection 2016.
2
Australian employee perceptions of an organizational-level intervention to reduce sitting.
Health Promot Int. 2018 Dec 1;33(6):968-979. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax037.
3
Trends in prevalence of leisure time physical activity and inactivity: results from Australian National Health Surveys 1989 to 2011.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Dec;41(6):617-624. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12699. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
4
Reducing occupational sitting: Workers' perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 May 30;14(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y.
5
A Cluster RCT to Reduce Workers' Sitting Time: Impact on Cardiometabolic Biomarkers.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Oct;49(10):2032-2039. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001328.
9
A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Office Workers' Sitting Time: Effect on Activity Outcomes.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Sep;48(9):1787-97. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000972.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验