Baudson Tanja G
Institute of Psychology, Educational and Psychological Assessment, University of Duisburg-Essen Essen, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 21;7:368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00368. eCollection 2016.
Scientists and laypeople agree on high ability as a defining feature of giftedness. Yet their views on gifted people's socioemotional characteristics diverge. Most studies find the gifted to be similar or slightly superior to average-ability persons in these domains ("harmony hypothesis"). However, subjective conceptions and media representations, most of which have focused on gifted children and youth, stress the socioemotional downsides of giftedness ("disharmony hypothesis"), affecting highly able individuals and those around them, thus hampering individual development. To date, most studies on gifted stereotypes have examined selective samples, mostly teachers. The present study is the first to provide representative data on conceptions of gifted individuals in general. A brief survey of 1029 German adults assessed quality and prevalence of stereotypes about gifted individuals, without an explicit focus on children and/or adolescents. Latent class analysis (LCA) revealed two conceptions of giftedness, with twice as many "disharmonious" than "harmonious" raters. Male gender, single parenthood, unemployment, higher income or negative attitudes toward the gifted predicted disharmonious ratings. However, effects were small, suggesting future studies look deeper into the processes of stereotype formation and maintenance.
科学家和外行人都认同高能力是天赋的一个决定性特征。然而,他们对有天赋之人的社会情感特征的看法却存在分歧。大多数研究发现,在这些方面,有天赋的人与能力一般的人相似或略胜一筹(“和谐假说”)。然而,主观观念和媒体呈现(其中大部分聚焦于有天赋的儿童和青少年)强调了天赋的社会情感方面的不利之处(“不和谐假说”),这影响了高能力个体及其周围的人,从而阻碍了个人发展。迄今为止,大多数关于天赋刻板印象的研究都考察了选择性样本,主要是教师。本研究首次提供了关于一般有天赋个体观念的代表性数据。一项对1029名德国成年人的简短调查评估了关于有天赋个体刻板印象的质量和普遍性,并未明确聚焦于儿童和/或青少年。潜在类别分析(LCA)揭示了两种天赋观念,持“不和谐”看法的人数是持“和谐”看法人数的两倍。男性、单亲家庭、失业、较高收入或对有天赋者的负面态度预示着不和谐的评价。然而,这些影响较小,这表明未来的研究需要更深入地探究刻板印象形成和维持的过程。