• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项以家庭为基础的青少年药物使用预防项目的以组成部分为中心的荟萃分析。

A component-centered meta-analysis of family-based prevention programs for adolescent substance use.

作者信息

Van Ryzin Mark J, Roseth Cary J, Fosco Gregory M, Lee You-Kyung, Chen I-Chien

机构信息

Oregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Drive, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.

Michigan State University College of Education, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;45:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.007
PMID:27064553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4856569/
Abstract

Although research has documented the positive effects of family-based prevention programs, the field lacks specific information regarding why these programs are effective. The current study summarized the effects of family-based programs on adolescent substance use using a component-based approach to meta-analysis in which we decomposed programs into a set of key topics or components that were specifically addressed by program curricula (e.g., parental monitoring/behavior management,problem solving, positive family relations, etc.). Components were coded according to the amount of time spent on program services that targeted youth, parents, and the whole family; we also coded effect sizes across studies for each substance-related outcome. Given the nested nature of the data, we used hierarchical linear modeling to link program components (Level 2) with effect sizes (Level 1). The overall effect size across programs was .31, which did not differ by type of substance. Youth-focused components designed to encourage more positive family relationships and a positive orientation toward the future emerged as key factors predicting larger than average effect sizes. Our results suggest that, within the universe of family-based prevention, where components such as parental monitoring/behavior management are almost universal, adding or expanding certain youth-focused components may be able to enhance program efficacy.

摘要

尽管研究已经记录了基于家庭的预防项目的积极效果,但该领域缺乏关于这些项目为何有效的具体信息。当前的研究采用基于成分的元分析方法,总结了基于家庭的项目对青少年物质使用的影响,在这种方法中,我们将项目分解为一系列项目课程专门涉及的关键主题或成分(例如,父母监督/行为管理、解决问题、积极的家庭关系等)。根据针对青少年、父母和整个家庭的项目服务所花费的时间对成分进行编码;我们还对每项与物质相关结果的研究中的效应量进行编码。鉴于数据的嵌套性质,我们使用分层线性模型将项目成分(第2层)与效应量(第1层)联系起来。所有项目的总体效应量为0.31,不同物质类型之间没有差异。旨在鼓励更积极的家庭关系和对未来持积极态度的以青少年为重点的成分,成为预测效应量大于平均水平的关键因素。我们的结果表明,在基于家庭的预防领域中,诸如父母监督/行为管理等成分几乎是普遍存在的,增加或扩展某些以青少年为重点的成分可能能够提高项目效果。

相似文献

1
A component-centered meta-analysis of family-based prevention programs for adolescent substance use.一项以家庭为基础的青少年药物使用预防项目的以组成部分为中心的荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;45:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Apr 3.
2
Examining Intervention Component Dosage Effects on Substance Use Initiation in the Strengthening Families Program: for Parents and Youth Ages 10-14.探讨“强化家庭计划”中干预成分剂量对物质使用起始的影响:针对 10-14 岁的父母和青少年。
Prev Sci. 2019 Aug;20(6):852-862. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-00994-7.
3
Prevention validation and accounting platform: a framework for establishing accountability and performance measures of substance abuse prevention programs.预防验证与核算平台:建立药物滥用预防项目问责制和绩效衡量标准的框架。
J Drug Educ. 2000;30(1):1-143. doi: 10.2190/6WVH-KXAV-6H54-777E.
4
Primary Substance Use Prevention Programs for Children and Youth: A Systematic Review.儿童和青少年原发性物质使用预防计划:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2020 Sep;146(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2747. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
5
A preliminary study of the population-adjusted effectiveness of substance abuse prevention programming: towards making IOM program types comparable.物质滥用预防规划的人口调整有效性初步研究:使医学研究所(IOM)项目类型具有可比性
J Prim Prev. 2009 Mar;30(2):89-107. doi: 10.1007/s10935-009-0168-x. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
6
Substance abuse prevention program content: systematizing the classification of what programs target for change.药物滥用预防项目内容:对项目旨在改变的目标进行分类系统化。
Health Educ Res. 2007 Jun;22(3):351-60. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl091. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
7
Family predictors of parent participation in an adolescent drug abuse prevention program.父母参与青少年药物滥用预防项目的家庭预测因素。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006 Jul;25(4):327-31. doi: 10.1080/09595230600741149.
8
A pattern-centered approach to evaluating substance use prevention programs.一种以模式为中心的方法来评估物质使用预防项目。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2003 Fall(101):87-98. doi: 10.1002/cd.84.
9
Impact of a positive youth development program in urban after-school settings on the prevention of adolescent substance use.城市课后活动场所积极青少年发展项目对预防青少年药物使用的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2007 Sep;41(3):239-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.02.016. Epub 2007 May 3.
10
Family protection and prevention of alcohol use among Hispanic youth at high risk.高危西班牙裔青少年的家庭保护与酒精使用预防
Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Dec;36(3-4):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-8614-2.

引用本文的文献

1
How Can Clinicians Improve Parental Monitoring of Adolescents? A Content Review of Manualized Interventions.临床医生如何改善对青少年的家长监督?手册化干预措施的内容综述。
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2025;10(1):162-174. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2024.2306626. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
2
¿Está disponible en español? A Systematic Review of Preventive Parenting Interventions Delivered in a Language Other Than English in the United States.有西班牙语版本吗?对在美国以英语以外的语言提供的预防性育儿干预措施的系统评价。
Prev Sci. 2025 Feb;26(2):293-319. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01778-y. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
3
Testing family-of-origin sensitization: Parent-adolescent conflict, emotional reactivity, and adolescent internalizing psychopathology.测试原生家庭致敏作用:亲子冲突、情绪反应性与青少年内化性精神病理学
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 Dec 4:1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424001779.
4
Cascading Effects of the Family Context in Adolescence: Implications for Young Adult Antisocial Behavior and Intergenerational Transmission of Risk.青少年家庭环境的连锁效应:对青年期反社会行为及风险代际传递的影响
Prev Sci. 2024 Oct 18. doi: 10.1007/s11121-024-01727-1.
5
Familias con Orgullo: Pilot Study of a Family Intervention for Latinx Sexual Minority Youth to Prevent Drug Use, Sexual Risk Behavior, and Depressive Symptoms.自豪家庭:拉丁裔性少数青年预防药物使用、性行为风险和抑郁症状的家庭干预试点研究。
Prev Sci. 2024 Oct;25(7):1079-1090. doi: 10.1007/s11121-024-01724-4. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
6
Identifying the challenges of policy content related to high-risk sexual behaviors, stimulant drugs, and alcohol consumption in adolescents.识别与青少年高危性行为、兴奋剂药物和酒精消费相关政策内容的挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11256-w.
7
Standard Versus Family-Based Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Adolescent Substance Use in Primary Care: Protocol for a Multisite Randomized Effectiveness Trial.在初级保健中,对青少年物质使用进行标准与基于家庭的筛查、简短干预和转介治疗的比较:一项多中心随机有效性试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 31;13:e54486. doi: 10.2196/54486.
8
Family-based Interventions of Preventing Substance Use Among Immigrant Youth: A Scoping Review.基于家庭的移民青少年预防药物使用干预措施:一项范围综述
Subst Use. 2024 May 4;18:29768357241244680. doi: 10.1177/29768357241244680. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
Examining profiles of convergence and divergence in reports of parental warmth: Links to adolescent developmental problems.审视父母温暖度报告中的趋同与差异特征:与青少年发展问题的关联
Dev Psychopathol. 2025 May;37(2):927-943. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424000762. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
10
A case study in developmental discontinuity: PROSPER Interventions and adolescent substance use trajectories shape young adult substance use and mental health problems.发展不连续性案例研究:PROSPER 干预和青少年物质使用轨迹塑造了年轻人的物质使用和心理健康问题。
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Dec;34(4):1263-1275. doi: 10.1111/jora.12940. Epub 2024 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Adolescent deviant peer clustering as an amplifying mechanism underlying the progression from early substance use to late adolescent dependence.青少年偏差同伴聚集作为从早期物质使用发展到青少年晚期成瘾的一种放大机制。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;55(10):1153-61. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12211. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
2
Do Parents Know Best? Examining the Relationship Between Parenting Profiles, Prevention Efforts, and Peak Drinking in College Students.父母最了解情况吗?审视育儿方式、预防措施与大学生饮酒高峰之间的关系。
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;41(12):2904-2927. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00860.x.
3
Family Intervention to Prevent Depression and Substance Use Among Adolescents of Depressed Parents.家庭干预预防抑郁父母的青少年抑郁和物质使用
J Child Fam Stud. 2012 Dec 1;21(6):891-905. doi: 10.1007/s10826-011-9549-x.
4
Two-year outcomes of a randomized, family-based substance use prevention trial for Asian American adolescent girls.亚裔美国少女基于家庭的物质使用预防试验的随机对照 2 年结果。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):788-798. doi: 10.1037/a0030925. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
5
Family and peer predictors of substance use from early adolescence to early adulthood: an 11-year prospective analysis.家庭和同伴因素对青少年至成年早期物质使用的预测:一项为期 11 年的前瞻性分析。
Addict Behav. 2012 Dec;37(12):1314-24. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
6
The efficacy of Familias Unidas on drug and alcohol outcomes for Hispanic delinquent youth: main effects and interaction effects by parental stress and social support.家庭联合模式对西班牙裔违法青少年药物和酒精使用结果的影响:父母压力和社会支持的主效应和交互效应。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Sep;125 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
7
Universal alcohol misuse prevention programmes for children and adolescents: Cochrane systematic reviews.儿童和青少年通用酒精滥用预防计划:Cochrane 系统评价。
Perspect Public Health. 2012 May;132(3):128-34. doi: 10.1177/1757913912443487.
8
Benefits of universal intervention effects on a youth protective shield 10 years after baseline.普遍干预措施对青年保护盾的影响 10 年后的效益。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Apr;50(4):414-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
9
A family intervention to reduce sexual risk behavior, substance use, and delinquency among newly homeless youth.家庭干预减少新无家可归青年的性行为风险、物质使用和犯罪行为。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Apr;50(4):358-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
10
Differential impact of a Dutch alcohol prevention program targeting adolescents and parents separately and simultaneously: low self-control and lenient parenting at baseline predict effectiveness.针对青少年及其父母分别和同时开展的荷兰酒精预防项目的差异影响:基线时的低自我控制和宽松养育方式预测了项目的有效性。
Prev Sci. 2012 Jun;13(3):278-87. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0267-9.