Schofield Thomas J, Parke Ross D, Coltrane Scott, Weaver Jennifer M
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Iowa State University.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside.
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Aug;30(5):614-24. doi: 10.1037/fam0000206. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
The purpose of this study was to examine differences and similarities across ratings of parenting by preadolescents, parents, and observers. Two hundred forty-one preadolescents rated their parents on warmth and harshness. Both mothers and fathers self-reported on these same dimensions, and observers rated each parents' warmth and harshness during a 10 min interaction task with the preadolescent. For the majority of outcomes assessed, the differences between preadolescent, parent, and observer ratings accounted for significant amounts of variance, beyond the levels accounted for by the average of their reports. A replication sample of 929 mother-child dyads provided a similar pattern of results. This methodology can help standardize the study of reporter differences, supports modeling of rater-specific variance as true score, and illustrates the benefits of collecting parenting data from multiple reporters. (PsycINFO Database Record
本研究的目的是检验青春期前儿童、父母和观察者对养育方式评分的差异与相似之处。241名青春期前儿童对其父母的温暖程度和严厉程度进行了评分。母亲和父亲都在这些相同维度上进行了自我报告，观察者在与青春期前儿童进行的10分钟互动任务中对每位父母的温暖程度和严厉程度进行了评分。对于所评估的大多数结果而言，青春期前儿童、父母和观察者评分之间的差异解释了大量的方差，超出了他们报告平均值所解释的水平。一个由929对母子二元组组成的重复样本提供了类似的结果模式。这种方法有助于使报告者差异的研究标准化，支持将评分者特定方差建模为真分数，并说明了从多个报告者收集养育数据的好处。（《心理学文摘数据库记录》
