Tsai Shang-Yueh, Fang Chun-Hao, Wu Thai-Yu, Lin Yi-Ru
Graduate Institute of Applied Physics, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Research Center for Mind, Brain and Learning, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 15;6:24564. doi: 10.1038/srep24564.
The MEGA-PRESS method is the most common method used to measure γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the brain at 3T. It has been shown that the underestimation of the GABA signal due to B0 drift up to 1.22 Hz/min can be reduced by post-frequency alignment. In this study, we show that the underestimation of GABA can still occur even with post frequency alignment when the B0 drift is up to 3.93 Hz/min. The underestimation can be reduced by applying a frequency shift threshold. A total of 23 subjects were scanned twice to assess the short-term reproducibility, and 14 of them were scanned again after 2-8 weeks to evaluate the long-term reproducibility. A linear regression analysis of the quantified GABA versus the frequency shift showed a negative correlation (P < 0.01). Underestimation of the GABA signal was found. When a frequency shift threshold of 0.125 ppm (15.5 Hz or 1.79 Hz/min) was applied, the linear regression showed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Therefore, a frequency shift threshold at 0.125 ppm (15.5 Hz) can be used to reduce underestimation during GABA quantification. For data with a B0 drift up to 3.93 Hz/min, the coefficients of variance of short-term and long-term reproducibility for the GABA quantification were less than 10% when the frequency threshold was applied.
MEGA-PRESS方法是在3T磁场下测量大脑中γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)最常用的方法。研究表明,通过频率后校正可以减少因B0漂移高达1.22 Hz/min导致的GABA信号低估。在本研究中,我们发现当B0漂移高达3.93 Hz/min时,即使进行频率后校正,GABA仍可能被低估。通过应用频率偏移阈值可以减少这种低估。共有23名受试者被扫描两次以评估短期重复性,其中14名受试者在2至8周后再次扫描以评估长期重复性。对定量的GABA与频率偏移进行线性回归分析显示呈负相关(P < 0.01),发现存在GABA信号低估的情况。当应用0.125 ppm(15.5 Hz或1.79 Hz/min)的频率偏移阈值时,线性回归显示无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。因此,0.125 ppm(15.5 Hz)的频率偏移阈值可用于减少GABA定量过程中的低估。对于B0漂移高达3.93 Hz/min的数据,应用频率阈值时,GABA定量的短期和长期重复性的变异系数均小于10%。