Van Ombergen Angelique, Lubeck Astrid J, Van Rompaey Vincent, Maes Leen K, Stins John F, Van de Heyning Paul H, Wuyts Floris L, Bos Jelte E
Antwerp University Research centre for Equilibrium and Aerospace (AUREA), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 29;11(4):e0154528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154528. eCollection 2016.
Vestibular patients occasionally report aggravation or triggering of their symptoms by visual stimuli, which is called visual vestibular mismatch (VVM). These patients therefore experience discomfort, disorientation, dizziness and postural unsteadiness.
Firstly, we aimed to get a better insight in the underlying mechanism of VVM by examining perceptual and postural symptoms. Secondly, we wanted to investigate whether roll-motion is a necessary trait to evoke these symptoms or whether a complex but stationary visual pattern equally provokes them.
Nine VVM patients and healthy matched control group were examined by exposing both groups to a stationary stimulus as well as an optokinetic stimulus rotating around the naso-occipital axis for a prolonged period of time. Subjective visual vertical (SVV) measurements, posturography and relevant questionnaires were assessed.
No significant differences between both groups were found for SVV measurements. Patients always swayed more and reported more symptoms than healthy controls. Prolonged exposure to roll-motion caused in patients and controls an increase in postural sway and symptoms. However, only VVM patients reported significantly more symptoms after prolonged exposure to the optokinetic stimulus compared to scores after exposure to a stationary stimulus.
VVM patients differ from healthy controls in postural and subjective symptoms and motion is a crucial factor in provoking these symptoms. A possible explanation could be a central visual-vestibular integration deficit, which has implications for diagnostics and clinical rehabilitation purposes. Future research should focus on the underlying central mechanism of VVM and the effectiveness of optokinetic stimulation in resolving it.
前庭疾病患者偶尔会报告视觉刺激会加重或引发其症状,这被称为视觉前庭不匹配(VVM)。因此,这些患者会感到不适、迷失方向、头晕和姿势不稳。
首先,我们旨在通过检查感知和姿势症状来更好地了解VVM的潜在机制。其次,我们想研究滚动运动是否是引发这些症状的必要特征,或者复杂但静止的视觉模式是否同样会引发这些症状。
对9名VVM患者和健康匹配对照组进行检查,让两组长时间暴露于静止刺激以及围绕鼻枕轴旋转的视动刺激。评估主观视觉垂直(SVV)测量、姿势描记法和相关问卷。
两组在SVV测量方面未发现显著差异。患者总是比健康对照组摇摆得更多,报告的症状也更多。长时间暴露于滚动运动导致患者和对照组的姿势摇摆和症状增加。然而,与暴露于静止刺激后的得分相比,只有VVM患者在长时间暴露于视动刺激后报告的症状明显更多。
VVM患者在姿势和主观症状方面与健康对照组不同,运动是引发这些症状的关键因素。一种可能的解释可能是中枢视觉-前庭整合缺陷,这对诊断和临床康复具有重要意义。未来的研究应关注VVM的潜在中枢机制以及视动刺激在解决该问题方面的有效性。