Centre for Population Health Research on Electromagnetic Energy (PRESEE), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Victoria 3004, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Information Technology, Ghent University/iMinds, Gaston Crommenlaan 8 Box 201, Ghent B-9050, Belgium.
Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug;92-93:388-97. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
The aims of this study were to: i) measure personal exposure in the Global System for Mobile communications (GSM) 900MHz downlink (DL) frequency band with two systems of exposimeters, a personal distributed exposimeter (PDE) and a pair of ExpoM-RFs, ii) compare the GSM 900MHz DL exposures across various microenvironments in Australia and Belgium, and iii) evaluate the correlation between the PDE and ExpoM-RFs measurements. Personal exposure data were collected using the PDE and two ExpoM-RFs simultaneously across 34 microenvironments (17 each in Australia and Belgium) located in urban, suburban and rural areas. Summary statistics of the electric field strengths (V/m) were computed and compared across similar microenvironments in Australia and Belgium. The personal exposures across urban microenvironments were higher than those in the rural or suburban microenvironments. Likewise, the exposure levels across the outdoor were higher than those for indoor microenvironments. The five highest median exposure levels were: city centre (0.248V/m), bus (0.124V/m), railway station (0.105V/m), mountain/forest (rural) (0.057V/m), and train (0.055V/m) [Australia]; and bicycle (urban) (0.238V/m), tram station (0.238V/m), city centre (0.156V/m), residential outdoor (urban) (0.139V/m) and park (0.124V/m) [Belgium]. Exposures in the GSM900 MHz frequency band across most of the microenvironments in Australia were significantly lower than the exposures across the microenvironments in Belgium. Overall correlations between the PDE and the ExpoM-RFs measurements were high. The measured exposure levels were far below the general public reference levels recommended in the guidelines of the ICNIRP and the ARPANSA.
i)使用两种暴露计系统,即个人分布式暴露计(PDE)和一对 ExpoM-RFs,测量全球移动通信系统(GSM)900MHz 下行链路(DL)频段的个人暴露量;ii)比较澳大利亚和比利时不同微环境中的 GSM 900MHz DL 暴露量;iii)评估 PDE 和 ExpoM-RFs 测量值之间的相关性。使用 PDE 和两个 ExpoM-RFs 在澳大利亚和比利时的 34 个微环境(澳大利亚和比利时各 17 个)中同时收集个人暴露数据,这些微环境位于城市、郊区和农村地区。计算并比较澳大利亚和比利时相似微环境中的电场强度(V/m)的统计摘要。城市微环境中的个人暴露量高于农村或郊区微环境中的暴露量。同样,室外的暴露水平高于室内微环境的暴露水平。五个最高的中位数暴露水平是:市中心(0.248V/m)、公共汽车(0.124V/m)、火车站(0.105V/m)、山区/森林(农村)(0.057V/m)和火车(0.055V/m)[澳大利亚];以及自行车(城市)(0.238V/m)、电车车站(0.238V/m)、市中心(0.156V/m)、城市住宅外(城市)(0.139V/m)和公园(0.124V/m)[比利时]。澳大利亚大多数微环境中的 GSM900MHz 频段暴露量明显低于比利时微环境中的暴露量。PDE 和 ExpoM-RFs 测量值之间的总体相关性较高。测量的暴露水平远低于 ICNIRP 和 ARPANSA 指南中建议的普通公众参考水平。