Sethi Amit, Sha Lingdao, Vahadane Abhishek Ramnath, Deaton Ryan J, Kumar Neeraj, Macias Virgilia, Gann Peter H
Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, India; Department of Pathology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Pathol Inform. 2016 Apr 11;7:17. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.179984. eCollection 2016.
Color normalization techniques for histology have not been empirically tested for their utility for computational pathology pipelines.
We compared two contemporary techniques for achieving a common intermediate goal - epithelial-stromal classification.
Expert-annotated regions of epithelium and stroma were treated as ground truth for comparing classifiers on original and color-normalized images.
Epithelial and stromal regions were annotated on thirty diverse-appearing H and E stained prostate cancer tissue microarray cores. Corresponding sets of thirty images each were generated using the two color normalization techniques. Color metrics were compared for original and color-normalized images. Separate epithelial-stromal classifiers were trained and compared on test images. Main analyses were conducted using a multiresolution segmentation (MRS) approach; comparative analyses using two other classification approaches (convolutional neural network [CNN], Wndchrm) were also performed.
For the main MRS method, which relied on classification of super-pixels, the number of variables used was reduced using backward elimination without compromising accuracy, and test - area under the curves (AUCs) were compared for original and normalized images. For CNN and Wndchrm, pixel classification test-AUCs were compared.
Khan method reduced color saturation while Vahadane reduced hue variance. Super-pixel-level test-AUC for MRS was 0.010-0.025 (95% confidence interval limits ± 0.004) higher for the two normalized image sets compared to the original in the 10-80 variable range. Improvement in pixel classification accuracy was also observed for CNN and Wndchrm for color-normalized images.
Color normalization can give a small incremental benefit when a super-pixel-based classification method is used with features that perform implicit color normalization while the gain is higher for patch-based classification methods for classifying epithelium versus stroma.
组织学中的颜色归一化技术尚未针对其在计算病理学流程中的效用进行实证测试。
我们比较了两种当代技术,以实现一个共同的中间目标——上皮-间质分类。
上皮和间质的专家注释区域被视为用于比较原始图像和颜色归一化图像上的分类器的真实标准。
在三十个外观各异的苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色前列腺癌组织微阵列核心上注释上皮和间质区域。使用两种颜色归一化技术分别生成了每组三十张图像。比较了原始图像和颜色归一化图像的颜色指标。在测试图像上训练并比较了单独的上皮-间质分类器。主要分析采用多分辨率分割(MRS)方法;还使用另外两种分类方法(卷积神经网络[CNN]、Wndchrm)进行了比较分析。
对于依赖超像素分类的主要MRS方法,使用向后消除法减少了所使用变量的数量,同时不影响准确性,并比较了原始图像和归一化图像的测试曲线下面积(AUC)。对于CNN和Wndchrm,比较了像素分类测试AUC。
Khan方法降低了颜色饱和度,而Vahadane方法降低了色调方差。在10 - 80变量范围内,与原始图像相比,两种归一化图像集的MRS超像素级测试AUC高0.010 - 0.025(95%置信区间范围±0.004)。对于颜色归一化图像,CNN和Wndchrm在像素分类准确性方面也有提高。
当基于超像素的分类方法与执行隐式颜色归一化的特征一起使用时,颜色归一化可以带来小幅增量效益,而对于基于补丁的上皮与间质分类方法,增益更高。