• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

草甘膦和氨甲基膦酸(AMPA)对柳树光合作用和叶绿素代谢的差异影响。

Differential effects of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) on photosynthesis and chlorophyll metabolism in willow plants.

作者信息

Gomes Marcelo Pedrosa, Le Manac'h Sarah Gingras, Maccario Sophie, Labrecque Michel, Lucotte Marc, Juneau Philippe

机构信息

Université du Québec à Montréal, Department of Biological Sciences, TOXEN, Ecotoxicology of Aquatic Microorganisms Laboratory, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal H3C 3P8, Québec, Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal, Institut des Sciences de l'environnement & GEOTOP, Succ. Centre-Ville, C.P. 8888, Montréal H3C 3P8, Québec, Canada.

Université du Québec à Montréal, Department of Biological Sciences, TOXEN, Ecotoxicology of Aquatic Microorganisms Laboratory, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal H3C 3P8, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2016 Jun;130:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.11.010
PMID:27155486
Abstract

We used a willow species (Salix miyabeana cultivar SX64) to examine the differential secondary-effects of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), the principal glyphosate by-product, on chlorophyll metabolism and photosynthesis. Willow plants were treated with different concentrations of glyphosate (equivalent to 0, 1.4, 2.1 and 2.8kgha(-1)) and AMPA (equivalent to 0, 0.28, 1.4 and 2.8kgha(-1)) and evaluations of pigment contents, chlorophyll fluorescence, and oxidative stress markers (hydrogen peroxide content and antioxidant enzyme activities) in leaves were performed after 12h of exposure. We observed that AMPA and glyphosate trigger different mechanisms leading to decreases in chlorophyll content and photosynthesis rates in willow plants. Both chemicals induced ROS accumulation in willow leaves although only glyphosate-induced oxidative damage through lipid peroxidation. By disturbing chlorophyll biosynthesis, AMPA induced decreases in chlorophyll contents, with consequent effects on photosynthesis. With glyphosate, ROS increases were higher than the ROS-sensitive threshold, provoking chlorophyll degradation (as seen by pheophytin accumulation) and invariable decreases in photosynthesis. Peroxide accumulation in both AMPA and glyphosate-treated plants was due to the inhibition of antioxidant enzyme activities. The different effects of glyphosate on chlorophyll contents and photosynthesis as described in the literature may be due to various glyphosate:AMPA ratios in those plants.

摘要

我们使用了一种柳树品种(柳属宫部柳栽培品种SX64)来研究草甘膦及其主要副产物氨甲基膦酸(AMPA)对叶绿素代谢和光合作用的不同次生效应。用不同浓度的草甘膦(相当于0、1.4、2.1和2.8 kg ha⁻¹)和AMPA(相当于0、0.28、1.4和2.8 kg ha⁻¹)处理柳树植株,暴露12小时后对叶片中的色素含量、叶绿素荧光和氧化应激标志物(过氧化氢含量和抗氧化酶活性)进行评估。我们观察到,AMPA和草甘膦引发了不同的机制,导致柳树植株中叶绿素含量和光合速率下降。两种化学物质均诱导柳树叶片中活性氧(ROS)积累,不过只有草甘膦通过脂质过氧化作用诱导氧化损伤。通过干扰叶绿素生物合成,AMPA导致叶绿素含量降低,进而影响光合作用。对于草甘膦,ROS的增加高于ROS敏感阈值,引发叶绿素降解(如通过脱镁叶绿素积累所见),光合作用持续下降。在AMPA和草甘膦处理的植株中过氧化物积累是由于抗氧化酶活性受到抑制。文献中描述的草甘膦对叶绿素含量和光合作用的不同影响可能是由于这些植株中草甘膦与AMPA的比例不同。

相似文献

1
Differential effects of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) on photosynthesis and chlorophyll metabolism in willow plants.草甘膦和氨甲基膦酸(AMPA)对柳树光合作用和叶绿素代谢的差异影响。
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2016 Jun;130:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
2
Impact of phosphate on glyphosate uptake and toxicity in willow.磷酸盐对柳树吸收和毒性 glyphosate 的影响。
J Hazard Mater. 2016 Mar 5;304:269-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.043. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
3
Physiological responses of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-sensitive soybean to aminomethylphosphonic acid, a metabolite of glyphosate.草甘膦抗性和草甘膦敏感大豆对草甘膦代谢物氨甲基膦酸的生理反应。
Chemosphere. 2011 Apr;83(4):593-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.008. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
4
Glyphosate-Dependent Inhibition of Photosynthesis in Willow.草甘膦对柳树光合作用的依赖性抑制作用
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Feb 17;8:207. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00207. eCollection 2017.
5
Alteration of plant physiology by glyphosate and its by-product aminomethylphosphonic acid: an overview.草甘膦及其副产物氨甲基膦酸对植物生理的影响:综述
J Exp Bot. 2014 Sep;65(17):4691-703. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru269. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
6
Glyphosate-Resistant and Conventional Canola (Brassica napus L.) Responses to Glyphosate and Aminomethylphosphonic Acid (AMPA) Treatment.抗草甘膦和常规油菜(甘蓝型油菜)对草甘膦和氨甲基膦酸(AMPA)处理的反应。
J Agric Food Chem. 2016 May 11;64(18):3508-13. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00446. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
7
Glyphosate effects on gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of two Lolium perenne L. biotypes with differential herbicide sensitivity.草甘膦对两种具有不同除草剂敏感性的梯牧草生物型气体交换和叶绿素荧光响应的影响。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012 Aug;57:210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.05.027. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
8
Aminomethylphosphonic acid, a metabolite of glyphosate, causes injury in glyphosate-treated, glyphosate-resistant soybean.氨甲基膦酸是草甘膦的一种代谢产物,会对经草甘膦处理的抗草甘膦大豆造成损伤。
J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Aug 11;52(16):5139-43. doi: 10.1021/jf049605v.
9
Isolated and combined effects of glyphosate and its by-product aminomethylphosphonic acid on the physiology and water remediation capacity of Salvinia molesta.草甘膦及其副产物氨甲基膦酸对水花生的生理和水修复能力的单独及联合效应。
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Sep 5;417:125694. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125694. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
10
Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid impact on redox status and biotransformation in fish and the mitigating effects of diet supplementation.草甘膦和氨甲基膦酸对鱼类氧化还原状态和生物转化的影响,以及饮食补充的缓解作用。
Vet Res Commun. 2024 Oct;48(5):2901-2914. doi: 10.1007/s11259-024-10481-2. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduced function in Chamaenerion angustifolium after sublethal glyphosate exposure.亚致死剂量草甘膦暴露后窄叶柳叶菜功能减退。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31155. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16938-x.
2
Unravelling herbicide stress and its impact on metabolite profiling in Cannabis sativa: an investigative study.解析大麻中的除草剂胁迫及其对代谢物谱的影响:一项调查研究。
J Cannabis Res. 2025 Jul 7;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s42238-025-00300-z.
3
Silicon can attenuate glyphosate-induced stress in young Handroanthus albus by improving photosynthetic efficiency and decreasing cellular electrolyte leakage.
硅可以通过提高光合效率和减少细胞电解质渗漏来减轻草甘膦对白花风铃木幼苗的胁迫。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23077. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07527-z.
4
Photophysiological and transcriptomic response to the broad-spectrum herbicides atrazine and glyphosate in a photosynthetic picoeukaryote.光合微微型真核生物对广谱除草剂阿特拉津和草甘膦的光生理和转录组反应
Microb Genom. 2025 Jun;11(6). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001402.
5
Proteomic analysis reveals the roles of silicon in mitigating glyphosate-induced toxicity in Brassica napus L.蛋白质组学分析揭示了硅在减轻草甘膦对甘蓝型油菜诱导毒性中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87024-5.
6
Gestational urinary concentrations of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in relation to preterm birth: the MIREC study.孕期草甘膦和氨甲基膦酸尿浓度与早产的关系:MIREC研究
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 18. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00702-w.
7
Computational study of the dimerization of glyphosate: mechanism and effect of solvent.草甘膦二聚化的计算研究:溶剂的作用机制及影响
RSC Adv. 2024 Jul 23;14(32):23184-23203. doi: 10.1039/d4ra04300f. eCollection 2024 Jul 19.
8
Hormesis, the Individual and Combined Phytotoxicity of the Components of Glyphosate-Based Formulations on Algal Growth and Photosynthetic Activity.低剂量兴奋效应、草甘膦制剂成分对藻类生长和光合活性的个体及联合植物毒性
Toxics. 2024 Mar 30;12(4):257. doi: 10.3390/toxics12040257.
9
Kinetics of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid sorption onto montmorillonite clays in soil and their translocation to genetically modified corn.草甘膦和氨甲基膦酸在土壤中蒙脱土黏土上的吸附动力学及其向转基因玉米中的迁移。
J Environ Sci (China). 2024 Jan;135:669-680. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
10
Early response of Solanum nigrum L. to Lumax and castor oil combination in relation to antioxidant activity, osmolyte concentration and chlorophyll a fluorescence.龙葵对卢马克斯和蓖麻油组合的早期响应与抗氧化活性、渗透物质浓度和叶绿素 a 荧光有关。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 9;13(1):409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27428-3.