Gao Lujuan, Jiang Shaojie, Sun Yi, Deng Meiqi, Wu Qingzhi, Li Ming, Zeng Tongxiang
Department of Dermatology, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Yangtze University Jingzhou, China.
Front Microbiol. 2016 Apr 27;7:617. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00617. eCollection 2016.
Infections of Fusarium spp. and Exophiala spp. are often chronic, recalcitrant, resulting in significant morbidity, causing discomfort, disfigurement, social isolation. Systemic disseminations happen in compromised patients, which are often refractory to available antifungal therapies and thereby lead to death. The antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been demonstrated to effectively inactivate multiple pathogenic fungi and is considered as a promising alternative treatment for mycoses. In the present study, we applied methylene blue (8, 16, and 32 μg/ml) as a photosensitizing agent and light emitting diode (635 ± 10 nm, 12 and 24 J/cm(2)), and evaluated the effects of photodynamic inactivation on five strains of Fusarium spp. and five strains of Exophiala spp., as well as photodynamic effects on in vitro susceptibility to itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and amphotericin B, both planktonic and biofilm forms. Photodynamic therapy was efficient in reducing the growth of all strains tested, exhibiting colony forming unit-reductions of up to 6.4 log10 and 5.6 log10 against planktonic cultures and biofilms, respectively. However, biofilms were less sensitive since the irradiation time was twice longer than that of planktonic cultures. Notably, the photodynamic effects against Fusarium strains with high minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of ≥16, 4-8, 4-8, and 2-4 μg/ml for itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and amphotericin B, respectively, were comparable or even superior to Exophiala spp., despite Exophiala spp. showed relatively better antifungal susceptibility profile. MIC ranges against planktonic cells of both species were up to 64 times lower after aPDT treatment. Biofilms of both species showed high sessile MIC50 (SMIC50) and SMIC80 of ≥16 μg/ml for all azoles tested and variable susceptibilities to amphotericin B, with SMIC ranging between 1 and 16 μg/ml. Biofilms subjected to aPDT exhibited a distinct reduction in SMIC50 and SMIC80 compared to untreated groups for both species, except SMIC80 of itraconazole against Fusarium biofilms. In conclusion, in vitro photodynamic therapy was efficient in inactivation of Fusarium spp. and Exophiala spp., both planktonic cultures and biofilms. In addition, the combination of aPDT and antifungal drugs represents an attractive alternative to the current antifungal strategies. However, further investigations are warranted for the reliable and safe application in clinical practice.
镰刀菌属和外瓶霉属感染通常是慢性、顽固性的,会导致严重发病,引起不适、毁容和社会隔离。系统性播散发生在免疫功能低下的患者中,这些感染通常对现有的抗真菌治疗无效,从而导致死亡。抗菌光动力疗法(aPDT)已被证明能有效灭活多种致病真菌,被认为是一种有前途的真菌病替代治疗方法。在本研究中,我们应用亚甲蓝(8、16和32μg/ml)作为光敏剂,以及发光二极管(635±10nm,12和24J/cm²),评估光动力灭活对五株镰刀菌属菌株和五株外瓶霉属菌株的效果,以及对浮游菌和生物膜形式的体外对伊曲康唑、伏立康唑、泊沙康唑和两性霉素B敏感性的光动力效应。光动力疗法能有效减少所有测试菌株的生长,对浮游菌培养物和生物膜的菌落形成单位减少量分别高达6.4 log10和5.6 log10。然而,生物膜对光动力疗法的敏感性较低,因为其照射时间是浮游菌培养物的两倍。值得注意的是,对于伊曲康唑、伏立康唑、泊沙康唑和两性霉素B的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)值分别≥16、4 - 8、4 - 8和2 - 4μg/ml的镰刀菌菌株,光动力效应与外瓶霉属相当甚至更优,尽管外瓶霉属显示出相对较好的抗真菌药敏谱。aPDT治疗后,两种菌浮游细胞MIC范围降低至原来的1/64。两种菌的生物膜对所有测试唑类药物的静态MIC50(SMIC50)和SMIC80均≥16μg/ml,对两性霉素B的敏感性各不相同,SMIC范围在1至16μg/ml之间。与未处理组相比,接受aPDT的生物膜中两种菌的SMIC50和SMIC80均显著降低,但伊曲康唑对镰刀菌生物膜的SMIC80除外。总之,体外光动力疗法能有效灭活镰刀菌属和外瓶霉属的浮游菌培养物和生物膜。此外,aPDT与抗真菌药物联合使用是目前抗真菌策略的一个有吸引力的替代方案。然而,为了在临床实践中可靠且安全地应用,还需要进一步研究。