Monzani Dario, Steca Patrizia, Greco Andrea, D'Addario Marco, Cappelletti Erika, Pancani Luca
Department of Psychology, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Psychol. 2015 May 29;11(2):295-310. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v11i2.935. eCollection 2015 May.
This study is aimed at investigating the dimensionality of the situational version of the Brief COPE, a questionnaire that is frequently used to assess a broad range of coping responses to specific difficulties, by comparing five different factor models highlighted in previous studies. It also aimed at exploring the relationships among coping responses, personal goal commitment and progress. The study involved 606 adults (male = 289) ranging in age from 19 to 71. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we compared five models and assessed relationships of coping responses with goal commitment and progress. The results confirmed the theoretical factor structure of the situational Brief COPE. All the 14 dimensions showed acceptable reliability and relationships with goal commitment and progress, attesting the reliability and usefulness of this measure to evaluate coping responses to specific events.
本研究旨在通过比较先前研究中强调的五种不同因素模型，来调查情境版简易应对方式问卷（Brief COPE）的维度，该问卷常用于评估对特定困难的广泛应对反应。研究还旨在探索应对反应、个人目标承诺和进展之间的关系。该研究涉及606名年龄在19岁至71岁之间的成年人（男性 = 289名）。我们使用验证性因素分析比较了五个模型，并评估了应对反应与目标承诺和进展之间的关系。结果证实了情境版简易应对方式问卷的理论因素结构。所有14个维度都显示出可接受的信度，以及与目标承诺和进展的关系，证明了该测量方法在评估对特定事件的应对反应方面的可靠性和实用性。
