Peprah Dorothy, Palmer Jennifer J, Rubin G James, Abubakar Abdinasir, Costa Alejandro, Martin Stephen, Perea William, Larson Heidi J
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom; Centre of African Studies, School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, United Kingdom.
Vaccine. 2016 Jul 19;34(33):3823-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.038. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
Oral cholera vaccination (OCV) campaigns were conducted from February to April 2014 among internally displaced persons (IDPs) in the midst of a humanitarian crisis in Juba, South Sudan. IDPs were predominantly members of the Nuer ethnic group who had taken refuge in United Nations bases following the eruption of violence in December 2013. The OCV campaigns, which were conducted by United Nations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) at the request of the Ministry of Health, reached an estimated 85-96% of the target population. As no previous studies on OCV acceptance have been conducted in the context of an on-going humanitarian crisis, semi-structured interviews were completed with 49 IDPs in the months after the campaigns to better understand perceptions of cholera and reasons for full, partial or non-acceptance of the OCV. Heightened fears of disease and political danger contributed to camp residents' perception of cholera as a serious illness and increased trust in United Nations and NGOs providing the vaccine to IDPs. Reasons for partial and non-acceptance of the vaccination included lack of time and fear of side effects, similar to reasons found in OCV campaigns in non-crisis settings. In addition, distrust in national institutions in a context of fears of ethnic persecution was an important reason for hesitancy and refusal. Other reasons included fear of taking the vaccine alongside other medication or with alcohol. The findings highlight the importance of considering the target populations' perceptions of institutions in the delivery of OCV interventions in humanitarian contexts. They also suggest a need for better communication about the vaccine, its side effects and interactions with other substances.
2014年2月至4月,在南苏丹朱巴发生人道主义危机期间,针对境内流离失所者开展了口服霍乱疫苗接种活动。境内流离失所者主要是努尔族成员,他们在2013年12月暴力事件爆发后逃到了联合国营地避难。应卫生部的要求,由联合国和非政府组织开展的口服霍乱疫苗接种活动覆盖了约85%至96%的目标人群。由于此前尚未在持续的人道主义危机背景下进行过关于口服霍乱疫苗接受情况的研究,因此在活动后的几个月里,对49名境内流离失所者进行了半结构化访谈,以更好地了解他们对霍乱的看法以及完全、部分或不接受口服霍乱疫苗的原因。对疾病和政治危险的担忧加剧,促使营地居民将霍乱视为一种严重疾病,并增强了对向境内流离失所者提供疫苗的联合国和非政府组织的信任。部分和不接受疫苗接种的原因包括缺乏时间和担心副作用,这与在非危机环境下口服霍乱疫苗接种活动中发现的原因类似。此外,在担心族裔迫害的背景下,对国家机构的不信任是犹豫和拒绝接种的一个重要原因。其他原因包括担心在服用其他药物或饮酒的同时接种疫苗。研究结果凸显了在人道主义背景下开展口服霍乱疫苗接种干预措施时,考虑目标人群对机构看法的重要性。研究结果还表明,需要更好地宣传疫苗、其副作用以及与其他物质的相互作用。