Vuolo Mike, Kelly Brian C, Kadowaki Joy
Department of Sociology, Ohio State University , Columbus, OH.
Department of Sociology, Purdue University , West Lafayette, IN.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Nov;18(11):2092-2099. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw150. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
In an analysis of smoking using a longitudinal sample of US young adults, we extend research on tobacco vending machine restrictions beyond its prior focus on minors by examining the influence of total vending machine restrictions, which apply to adult-only facilities and represents the only remaining vending machine exemption since the enactment of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. We identify whether the passage of a restriction influences an individual's smoking on repeated observations, and if the propensity is lower among those who live in locations with a restriction.
Combining a repository of US tobacco policies at all geographic levels with the nationally-representative geocoded National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 and Census data, we use multilevel logistic regression to examine the impact of total vending machine restrictions on any past 30-day smoking and past 30-day smoking of one pack per day among young adults (ages 19-31), while accounting for other tobacco control policy, community, and individual covariates.
We find that total vending machine restrictions decrease any recent smoking (OR = 0.451; p < .01), net of other covariates. Though the passage of a restriction does not alter an individual's smoking over time, living longer in an area that has a restriction lowers the propensity that an individual will smoke at all (OR = 0.442; p < .05). We find no effect of total vending machine restrictions on smoking a pack daily.
Total vending machine restrictions appear to be an effective, yet highly underutilized, means of tobacco control.
Past scientific inquiries examining vending machine restrictions have focused upon minor access, adolescent perceptions of availability, and subsequent smoking. The potential for total vending machine restrictions, which extend to adult-only facilities, to influence patterns of smoking among those of legal age, remains significant. Those who are subject to total vending machine restrictions for longer periods are less likely to have recently smoked, but individuals do not change their smoking behavior in response to the passage of a restriction. These restrictions do not affect heavy smokers. Such policies are an effective but underutilized policy mechanism to prevent smoking among young adults.
在一项对美国年轻成年人纵向样本的吸烟情况分析中,我们通过研究适用于仅限成年人场所的自动售货机全面限制措施的影响,拓展了对烟草自动售货机限制措施的研究,该措施是自《家庭吸烟预防与烟草控制法案》颁布以来唯一留存的自动售货机豁免规定。我们确定一项限制措施的通过是否会在重复观察中影响个体吸烟情况,以及在居住于设有此类限制措施地区的人群中吸烟倾向是否较低。
我们将各级地理层面的美国烟草政策库与具有全国代表性的、经地理编码的1997年全国青年纵向调查及人口普查数据相结合,运用多层次逻辑回归分析来研究自动售货机全面限制措施对年轻成年人(19至31岁)过去30天内的任何吸烟行为以及过去30天内每天一包烟的吸烟行为的影响,同时考虑其他烟草控制政策、社区和个体协变量。
我们发现,在扣除其他协变量后,自动售货机全面限制措施会降低近期的任何吸烟行为(比值比=0.451;p<0.01)。虽然一项限制措施的通过不会随时间改变个体的吸烟行为,但在设有此类限制措施的地区居住时间越长,个体完全吸烟的倾向就越低(比值比=0.442;p<0.05)。我们发现自动售货机全面限制措施对每日吸一包烟的行为没有影响。
自动售货机全面限制措施似乎是一种有效的烟草控制手段,但目前利用程度极低。
过去有关自动售货机限制措施的科学研究主要集中在未成年人获取途径、青少年对可得性的认知以及随后的吸烟行为上。自动售货机全面限制措施(延伸至仅限成年人的场所)影响法定年龄人群吸烟模式的潜力仍然很大。受自动售货机全面限制措施影响时间较长的人群近期吸烟的可能性较小,但个体不会因一项限制措施的通过而改变其吸烟行为。这些限制措施对重度吸烟者没有影响。此类政策是预防年轻成年人吸烟的一种有效但未得到充分利用的政策机制。