Suppr超能文献

实施改善非特异性下腰痛管理的干预措施:一项系统评价

Implementation interventions to improve the management of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.

作者信息

Mesner Simon Alexander, Foster Nadine E, French Simon David

机构信息

, 502, Caspian, Apartments, 5, Salton Square, London, England, E14 7GJ.

NIHR Musculoskeletal Health in Primary Care, Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, England, ST5 5BG.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jun 10;17:258. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1110-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recommendations in clinical practice guidelines for non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) are not necessarily translated into practice. Multiple studies have investigated different interventions to implement best evidence into clinical practice yet no synthesis of these studies has been carried out to date. The aim of this study was to systematically review available studies to determine whether implementation interventions in this field have been effective and to identify which strategies have been most successful in changing healthcare practitioner behaviours and improving patient outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken, searching electronic databases until end of December 2012 plus hand searching, writing to key authors and using prior knowledge of the field to identify papers. Included studies evaluated an implementation intervention to improve the management of NSLBP in clinical practice, measured key outcomes regarding change in practitioner behaviour and/or patient outcomes and subjected their data to statistical analysis. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) recommendations about systematic review conduct were followed. Study inclusion, data extraction and study risk of bias assessments were conducted independently by two review authors.

RESULTS

Of 7654 potentially eligible citations, 17 papers reporting on 14 studies were included. Risk of bias of included studies was highly variable with 7 of 17 papers rated at high risk. Single intervention or one-off implementation efforts were consistently ineffective in changing clinical practice. Increasing the frequency and duration of implementation interventions led to greater success with those continuously ongoing over time the most successful in improving clinical practice in line with best evidence recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Single intervention or one-off implementation interventions may seem attractive but are largely unsuccessful in effecting meaningful change in clinical practice for NSLBP. Increasing frequency and duration of implementation interventions seems to lead to greater success and the most successful implementation interventions used consistently sustained strategies.

摘要

背景

临床实践指南中针对非特异性下腰痛(NSLBP)的建议不一定会转化为实际行动。多项研究调查了不同的干预措施,以将最佳证据应用于临床实践,但迄今为止尚未对这些研究进行综合分析。本研究的目的是系统地回顾现有研究,以确定该领域的实施干预措施是否有效,并确定哪些策略在改变医疗从业者行为和改善患者结局方面最为成功。

方法

进行了一项系统回顾,检索电子数据库至2012年12月底,并进行手工检索、写信给主要作者以及利用该领域的先验知识来识别论文。纳入的研究评估了一项实施干预措施,以改善NSLBP在临床实践中的管理,测量了有关从业者行为变化和/或患者结局的关键指标,并对其数据进行了统计分析。遵循了Cochrane有效实践与护理组织(EPOC)关于系统回顾开展的建议。研究纳入、数据提取和研究偏倚风险评估由两名综述作者独立进行。

结果

在7654条潜在合格引文中,纳入了17篇报告14项研究的论文。纳入研究的偏倚风险差异很大,17篇论文中有7篇被评为高风险。单一干预或一次性实施努力在改变临床实践方面始终无效。增加实施干预的频率和持续时间会带来更大的成功,随着时间的推移持续进行的干预在根据最佳证据建议改善临床实践方面最为成功。

结论

单一干预或一次性实施干预可能看起来很有吸引力,但在对NSLBP的临床实践产生有意义的改变方面大多不成功。增加实施干预的频率和持续时间似乎会带来更大的成功,最成功的实施干预采用了持续的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6b5/4902903/6620933343a3/12891_2016_1110_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验