de la Vega Rocío, Racine Mélanie, Sánchez-Rodríguez Elisabet, Tomé-Pires Catarina, Castarlenas Elena, Jensen Mark P, Miró Jordi
Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain-ALGOS.
Department of Psychology, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC).
Pain Med. 2016 Nov;17(11):1971-1977. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw118. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
Pain has been shown to be associated with poor sleep quality. The aim of this study was to better understand the role that pain intensity and pain extent (number of painful areas) may play in the sleep quality of young people with acute and chronic pain.
Cross-sectional survey.
A convenience sample of adolescents and young adults with acute or chronic pain; 414 individuals ages 12 to 24 (44% with chronic pain).
We performed a hierarchical regression analysis with sleep as the dependent variable and pain intensity, extent, age and pain chronicity as predictors.
Pain extent and pain intensity made significant and independent contributions to the prediction of sleep quality (βs = 0.23 [P < 0.001] and 0.14 [P < 0.01]). Young adults reported poorer sleep than adolescents (β = 0.13, P < 0.01). Two significant interactions emerged: age × intensity (β = 0.39, P < 0.05) and chronicity × intensity (β = 0.88, P < 0.001).
Sleep quality in young people could be improved by teaching them strategies to better manage pain intensity and pain extent. Clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of (and best timing for) pain interventions to improve sleep quality are warranted.
已有研究表明疼痛与睡眠质量差有关。本研究旨在更深入地了解疼痛强度和疼痛范围(疼痛区域数量)在急慢性疼痛青年人群睡眠质量中可能发挥的作用。
横断面调查。
选取患有急性或慢性疼痛的青少年及青年作为便利样本;共414例年龄在12至24岁之间的个体(44%患有慢性疼痛)。
我们进行了分层回归分析,以睡眠作为因变量,疼痛强度、范围、年龄和疼痛慢性程度作为预测变量。
疼痛范围和疼痛强度对睡眠质量的预测有显著且独立的贡献(β值分别为0.23 [P < 0.001] 和0.14 [P < 0.01])。青年人群报告的睡眠质量比青少年差(β = 0.13,P < 0.01)。出现了两个显著的交互作用:年龄×强度(β = 0.39,P < 0.05)和慢性程度×强度(β = 0.88,P < 0.001)。
通过教导年轻人更好地管理疼痛强度和范围的策略,可以改善他们的睡眠质量。有必要进行临床试验以评估改善睡眠质量的疼痛干预措施的疗效(以及最佳时机)。