Austad Steven N, Fischer Kathleen E
Department of Biology and Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of Aging, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-1170, USA.
Department of Biology and Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of Aging, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-1170, USA.
Cell Metab. 2016 Jun 14;23(6):1022-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.019.
Sex differences in longevity can provide insights into novel mechanisms of aging, yet they have been little studied. Surprisingly, sex-specific longevity patterns are best known in wild animals. Evolutionary hypotheses accounting for longevity patterns in natural populations include differential vulnerability to environmental hazards, differential intensity of sexual selection, and distinct patterns of parental care. Mechanistic hypotheses focus on hormones, asymmetric inheritance of sex chromosomes and mitochondria. Virtually all intensively studied species show conditional sex differences in longevity. Humans are the only species in which one sex is known to have a ubiquitous survival advantage. Paradoxically, although women live longer, they suffer greater morbidity particularly late in life. This mortality-morbidity paradox may be a consequence of greater connective tissue responsiveness to sex hormones in women. Human females' longevity advantage may result from hormonal influences on inflammatory and immunological responses, or greater resistance to oxidative damage; current support for these mechanisms is weak.
寿命方面的性别差异能够为衰老的新机制提供见解,但相关研究却很少。令人惊讶的是,特定性别的寿命模式在野生动物中最为人所知。解释自然种群中寿命模式的进化假说包括对环境危害的不同易感性、性选择的不同强度以及独特的亲代抚育模式。机制假说则聚焦于激素、性染色体和线粒体的不对称遗传。几乎所有经过深入研究的物种在寿命上都表现出有条件的性别差异。人类是已知其中一个性别普遍具有生存优势的唯一物种。矛盾的是,尽管女性寿命更长,但她们尤其是在晚年时发病率更高。这种死亡率 - 发病率悖论可能是女性结缔组织对性激素反应更强的结果。人类女性的长寿优势可能源于激素对炎症和免疫反应的影响,或者对氧化损伤的更强抵抗力;目前对这些机制的支持力度较弱。