Saba Luca, Banchhor Sumit K, Suri Harman S, Londhe Narendra D, Araki Tadashi, Ikeda Nobutaka, Viskovic Klaudija, Shafique Shoaib, Laird John R, Gupta Ajay, Nicolaides Andrew, Suri Jasjit S
Department of Radiology, University of Cagliari, Italy.
Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Comput Biol Med. 2016 Aug 1;75:217-34. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
This study presents AtheroCloud™ - a novel cloud-based smart carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) measurement tool using B-mode ultrasound for stroke/cardiovascular risk assessment and its stratification. This is an anytime-anywhere clinical tool for routine screening and multi-center clinical trials. In this pilot study, the physician can upload ultrasound scans in one of the following formats (DICOM, JPEG, BMP, PNG, GIF or TIFF) directly into the proprietary cloud of AtheroPoint from the local server of the physician's office. They can then run the intelligent and automated AtheroCloud™ cIMT measurements in point-of-care settings in less than five seconds per image, while saving the vascular reports in the cloud. We statistically benchmark AtheroCloud™ cIMT readings against sonographer (a registered vascular technologist) readings and manual measurements derived from the tracings of the radiologist. One hundred patients (75 M/25 F, mean age: 68±11 years), IRB approved, Toho University, Japan, consisted of Left/Right common carotid artery (CCA) artery (200 ultrasound scans), (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) were collected using a 7.5MHz transducer. The measured cIMTs for L/R carotid were as follows (in mm): (i) AtheroCloud™ (0.87±0.20, 0.77±0.20); (ii) sonographer (0.97±0.26, 0.89±0.29) and (iii) manual (0.90±0.20, 0.79±0.20), respectively. The coefficient of correlation (CC) between sonographer and manual for L/R cIMT was 0.74 (P<0.0001) and 0.65 (P<0.0001), while, between AtheroCloud™ and manual was 0.96 (P<0.0001) and 0.97 (P<0.0001), respectively. We observed that 91.15% of the population in AtheroCloud™ had a mean cIMT error less than 0.11mm compared to sonographer's 68.31%. The area under curve for receiving operating characteristics was 0.99 for AtheroCloud™ against 0.81 for sonographer. Our Framingham Risk Score stratified the population into three bins as follows: 39% in low-risk, 70.66% in medium-risk and 10.66% in high-risk bins. Statistical tests were performed to demonstrate consistency, reliability and accuracy of the results. The proposed AtheroCloud™ system is completely reliable, automated, fast (3-5 seconds depending upon the image size having an internet speed of 180Mbps), accurate, and an intelligent, web-based clinical tool for multi-center clinical trials and routine telemedicine clinical care.
本研究展示了AtheroCloud™——一种基于云的新型智能颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)测量工具,它使用B模式超声进行中风/心血管风险评估及其分层。这是一种可随时随地用于常规筛查和多中心临床试验的临床工具。在这项初步研究中,医生可以将以下格式(DICOM、JPEG、BMP、PNG、GIF或TIFF)之一的超声扫描图像从医生办公室的本地服务器直接上传到AtheroPoint的专有云端。然后,他们可以在即时护理环境中以每秒不到五秒的速度对每张图像运行智能且自动化的AtheroCloud™ cIMT测量,同时将血管报告保存在云端。我们对AtheroCloud™的cIMT读数与超声检查人员(注册血管技术专家)的读数以及从放射科医生的描记图得出的手动测量值进行了统计学基准对比。100名患者(75名男性/25名女性,平均年龄:68±11岁),经日本东海大学伦理审查委员会批准,使用7.5MHz换能器采集了左右颈总动脉(CCA)(200次超声扫描)(日本东京东芝公司)。左右颈动脉测量的cIMT如下(单位:毫米):(i)AtheroCloud™(0.87±0.20,0.77±0.20);(ii)超声检查人员(0.97±0.26,0.89±0.29);(iii)手动测量(0.90±0.20,0.79±0.20)。左右cIMT超声检查人员与手动测量之间的相关系数(CC)分别为0.74(P<0.0001)和0.65(P<0.0001),而AtheroCloud™与手动测量之间的相关系数分别为0.96(P<0.0001)和0.97(P<0.0001)。我们观察到,与超声检查人员的68.31%相比,AtheroCloud™中91.15%的人群平均cIMT误差小于0.11毫米。AtheroCloud™的接受操作特征曲线下面积为0.99,而超声检查人员为0.81。我们的弗明汉风险评分将人群分为以下三个类别:低风险39%,中风险70.66%,高风险10.66%。进行了统计测试以证明结果的一致性、可靠性和准确性。所提出的AtheroCloud™系统完全可靠、自动化、快速(根据图像大小,网速为180Mbps时为3 - 5秒)、准确,是一种用于多中心临床试验和常规远程医疗临床护理的智能网络临床工具。