Knight-Jones T J D, Robinson L, Charleston B, Rodriguez L L, Gay C G, Sumption K J, Vosloo W
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Lusaka, Zambia.
Insight Editing London, London, UK.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016 Jun;63 Suppl 1:14-29. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12522.
We assessed knowledge gaps in foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) research, and in this study, we consider (i) epidemiology, (ii) wildlife and (iii) economics. The study took the form of a literature review (2011-2015) combined with research updates collected in 2014 from 33 institutes from across the world. Findings were used to identify priority areas for future FMD research. During 2011-2015, modelling studies were dominant in the broad field of epidemiology; however, continued efforts are required to develop robust models for use during outbreaks in FMD-free countries, linking epidemiologic and economics models. More guidance is needed for both the evaluation and the setting of targets for vaccine coverage, population immunity and vaccine field efficacy. Similarly, methods for seroprevalence studies need to be improved to obtain more meaningful outputs that allow comparison across studies. To inform control programmes in endemic countries, field trials assessing the effectiveness of vaccination in extensive smallholder systems should be performed to determine whether FMD can be controlled with quality vaccines in settings where implementing effective biosecurity is challenging. Studies need to go beyond measuring only vaccine effects and should extend our knowledge of the impact of FMD and increase our understanding of how to maximize farmer participation in disease control. Where wildlife reservoirs of virus exist, particularly African Buffalo, we need to better understand when and under what circumstances transmission to domestic animals occurs in order to manage this risk appropriately, considering the impact of control measures on livelihoods and wildlife. For settings where FMD eradication is unfeasible, further ground testing of commodity-based trade is recommended. A thorough review of global FMD control programmes, covering successes and failures, would be extremely valuable and could be used to guide other control programmes.
我们评估了口蹄疫(FMD)研究中的知识空白,在本研究中,我们考虑了以下三个方面:(i)流行病学,(ii)野生动物,以及(iii)经济学。该研究采用了文献综述(2011 - 2015年)的形式,并结合了2014年从全球33个机构收集的研究更新内容。研究结果用于确定未来口蹄疫研究的优先领域。在2011 - 2015年期间,建模研究在流行病学的广泛领域中占主导地位;然而,仍需继续努力开发强大的模型,以便在无口蹄疫国家爆发疫情时使用,将流行病学模型和经济学模型联系起来。在疫苗接种覆盖率、群体免疫力和疫苗现场效力的评估及目标设定方面,都需要更多的指导。同样,血清流行率研究的方法也需要改进,以获得更有意义的结果,便于不同研究之间进行比较。为了为流行国家的防控计划提供信息,应开展实地试验,评估在广泛的小农户系统中疫苗接种的效果,以确定在实施有效的生物安全措施具有挑战性的环境中,口蹄疫是否可以通过优质疫苗得到控制。研究不仅要测量疫苗效果,还应扩展我们对口蹄疫影响的认识,并增进我们对如何最大限度地提高农民参与疾病防控的理解。在存在病毒野生动物宿主的地方,特别是非洲水牛,我们需要更好地了解病毒何时以及在何种情况下传播到家畜身上,以便在考虑控制措施对生计和野生动物的影响的情况下,妥善管理这种风险。对于无法根除口蹄疫的地区,建议进一步对基于商品的贸易进行实地测试。全面审查全球口蹄疫防控计划,涵盖成功与失败案例,将极具价值,并可用于指导其他防控计划。