Suppr超能文献

当前关于氡风险的知识:对实际辐射防护有何影响?氡研讨会,2015年12月1日至2日,波恩,德国联邦环境、自然保护、建筑和核安全部(BMUB)

Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop, 1/2 December 2015, Bonn, BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety).

作者信息

Müller Wolfgang-Ulrich, Giussani Augusto, Rühm Werner, Lecomte Jean-Francois, Harrison John, Kreuzer Michaela, Sobotzki Christina, Breckow Joachim

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Strahlenbiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, 45122, Essen, Germany.

Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Oberschleissheim, Germany.

出版信息

Radiat Environ Biophys. 2016 Aug;55(3):267-80. doi: 10.1007/s00411-016-0657-2. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

Abstract

ICRP suggested a strategy based on the distinction between a protection approach for dwellings and one for workplaces in the previous recommendations on radon. Now, the Commission recommends an integrated approach for the protection against radon exposure in all buildings irrespective of their purpose and the status of their occupants. The strategy of protection in buildings, implemented through a national action plan, is based on the application of the optimisation principle below a derived reference level in concentration (maximum 300 Bq m(-3)). A problem, however, arises that due to new epidemiological findings and application of dosimetric models, ICRP 115 (Ann ICRP 40, 2010) presents nominal probability coefficients for radon exposure that are approximately by a factor of 2 larger than in the former recommendations of ICRP 65 (Ann ICRP 23, 1993). On the basis of the so-called epidemiological approach and the dosimetric approach, the doubling of risk per unit exposure is represented by a doubling of the dose coefficients, while the risk coefficient of ICRP 103 (2007) remains unchanged. Thus, an identical given radon exposure situation with the new dose coefficients would result in a doubling of dose compared with the former values. This is of serious conceptual implications. A possible solution of this problem was presented during the workshop.

摘要

国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)在之前关于氡的建议中提出了一种基于区分住宅防护方法和工作场所防护方法的策略。现在,委员会建议采用一种综合方法,以防护所有建筑物中的氡暴露,无论其用途和居住者身份如何。通过国家行动计划实施的建筑物防护策略,是基于在浓度的导出参考水平(最大300 Bq m(-3))以下应用最优化原则。然而,出现了一个问题,由于新的流行病学研究结果和剂量学模型的应用,ICRP 115(《ICRP年报》40,2010年)给出的氡暴露名义概率系数比ICRP 65(《ICRP年报》23,1993年)的先前建议大约大2倍。基于所谓的流行病学方法和剂量学方法,单位暴露风险加倍表现为剂量系数加倍,而ICRP 103(2007年)的风险系数保持不变。因此,在相同的给定氡暴露情况下,新的剂量系数将导致剂量比先前值加倍。这具有严重的概念性影响。在研讨会上提出了这个问题的一个可能解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ee/4951500/8ee77cdb9dfe/411_2016_657_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验