Jamison K R
Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Psychiatry. 1989 May;52(2):125-34. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1989.11024436.
Extremes in mood, thought and behavior--including psychosis--have been linked with artistic creativity for as long as man has observed and written about those who write, paint, sculpt or compose. The history of this long and fascinating association, as well as speculations about its reasons for being, have been discussed by several modern authors and investigators, including Koestler (1975), Storr (1976), Andreasen (1978), Becker (1978), Rothenberg (1979), Richards (1981), Jamison (in press) and Prentky (in press). The association between extreme states of emotion and mind and creativity not only is fascinating but also has significant theoretical, clinical, literary and societal-ethical implications. These issues, more thoroughly reviewed elsewhere (Jamison et al. 1980; Richards 1981; Jamison, in press), include the understanding of cognitive, perceptual, mood and behavioral changes common to manic, depressive and creative states; the potential ability to lessen the stigma of mental illness; effects of psychiatric treatment (for example, lithium) on creativity; and concerns raised about genetic research on mood disorders. The current study was designed to ascertain rates of treatment for affective illness in a sample of eminent British writers and artists; to study differences in subgroups (poets, novelists, playwrights, biographers, artists); to examine seasonal patterns of moods and productivity; and to inquire into the perceived role of very intense moods in the writers' and artists' work. One of the major purposes of this investigation was to look at possible similarities and dissimilarities between periods of intense creative activity and hypomania. Hypothesized similarities were based on the overlapping nature of mood, cognitive and behavioral changes associated with both; the episodic nature of both; and possible links between the durational, frequency and seasonal patterns of both experiences.
自从人类开始观察并记述那些从事写作、绘画、雕塑或作曲的人以来,情绪、思维和行为的极端状态——包括精神病——就一直与艺术创造力联系在一起。几位现代作家和研究者,包括科斯特勒(1975年)、斯托尔(1976年)、安德烈亚森(1978年)、贝克尔(1978年)、罗滕伯格(1979年)、理查兹(1981年)、贾米森(即将出版)和普伦蒂基(即将出版),都讨论过这种长久而迷人的关联的历史,以及对其存在原因的种种推测。情绪和思维的极端状态与创造力之间的关联不仅引人入胜,而且具有重要的理论、临床、文学和社会伦理意义。这些问题在其他地方已有更全面的综述(贾米森等人,1980年;理查兹,1981年;贾米森,即将出版),包括对躁狂、抑郁和创作状态共有的认知、感知、情绪和行为变化的理解;减轻精神疾病污名的潜在能力;精神科治疗(例如锂盐)对创造力的影响;以及对情绪障碍基因研究引发的担忧。本研究旨在确定一组杰出英国作家和艺术家样本中情感性疾病的治疗率;研究亚组(诗人、小说家、剧作家、传记作家、艺术家)之间的差异;检查情绪和创作力的季节性模式;并探究强烈情绪在作家和艺术家作品中所感知到的作用。这项调查的主要目的之一是研究强烈创作活动期与轻躁狂之间可能的异同。假设的相似性基于与两者相关的情绪、认知和行为变化的重叠性质;两者的发作性性质;以及两种体验在持续时间、频率和季节性模式方面可能的联系。