Kristiansen K B, Rancke-Madsen A
Ugeskr Laeger. 1989 May 29;151(22):1369-71.
On the basis of a questionnaire sent to the scientific societies, information is presented about the administrative organisation involved in selection of applicants for teaching appointments and information about the qualifications of the applicants in 1986. Fourteen specialties had established a central assessment committee. In ten of the specialties, between 11% and 35% of the qualified applicants received teaching appointments, in four specialties between 60% and 80% and in two specialties 100%. The average postgraduate seniority for the selected applicants in the individual specialties was between 5 and 9.8 years. Where the entire material was concerned, the average postgraduate seniority was 6.9 years but information was not available where four specialties were concerned. Seven of the societies stated that assessment of the qualities of scientific articles was undertaken. The average number of articles for the selected applicants varied in the individual specialties from four to 16 articles. It is concluded, that more frankness should be established about selection of the applicants in order to avoid rumours about nepotism and to advise students.
基于发送给各科学学会的一份调查问卷，文中呈现了1986年有关参与教学职位申请人选拔的行政组织信息以及申请人的资质信息。14个专业设立了中央评估委员会。在10个专业中，11%至35%的合格申请人获得了教学职位，在4个专业中这一比例为60%至80%，在2个专业中为100%。各专业中被选中申请人的平均研究生资历在5至9.8年之间。就全部材料而言，平均研究生资历为6.9年，但有4个专业的信息未提供。7个学会表示对科研文章的质量进行了评估。各专业中被选中申请人的文章平均数量从4篇到16篇不等。得出的结论是，在申请人选拔方面应更加坦诚，以避免有关任人唯亲的谣言并为学生提供建议。
