Li Bing, Zhu Xinyi, Hou Jianhua, Chen Tingji, Wang Pengyun, Li Juan
Center on Aging Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, China; English Department, Faculty of Humanities and Educational Sciences, Technische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweig, Germany.
Center on Aging Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, China.
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 7;7:834. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00834. eCollection 2016.
As mnemonic utilization deficit in older adults associates with age-related decline in executive function, we hypothesized that memory strategy training combined with executive function training might induce larger training effect in memory and broader training effects in non-memory outcomes than pure memory training. The present study compared the effects of combined cognitive training (executive function training plus memory strategy training) to pure memory strategy training. Forty healthy older adults were randomly assigned to a combined cognitive training group or a memory strategy training group. A control group receiving no training was also included. Combined cognitive training group received 16 sessions of training (eight sessions of executive function training followed by eight sessions of memory strategy training). Memory training group received 16 sessions of memory strategy training. The results partly supported our hypothesis in that indeed improved performance on executive function was only found in combined training group, whereas memory performance increased less in combined training compared to memory strategy group. Results suggest that combined cognitive training may be less efficient than pure memory training in memory outcomes, though the influences from insufficient training time and less closeness between trained executive function and working memory could not be excluded; however it has broader training effects in non-memory outcomes.
www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR-OON-16007793.
由于老年人的记忆策略运用缺陷与执行功能的年龄相关衰退有关,我们假设与单纯的记忆训练相比,记忆策略训练与执行功能训练相结合可能在记忆方面产生更大的训练效果,在非记忆结果方面产生更广泛的训练效果。本研究比较了联合认知训练(执行功能训练加记忆策略训练)与单纯记忆策略训练的效果。40名健康老年人被随机分配到联合认知训练组或记忆策略训练组。还包括一个不接受训练的对照组。联合认知训练组接受16次训练(8次执行功能训练,随后8次记忆策略训练)。记忆训练组接受16次记忆策略训练。结果部分支持了我们的假设,即确实只有联合训练组的执行功能表现得到改善,而与记忆策略组相比,联合训练组的记忆表现提高较少。结果表明,联合认知训练在记忆结果方面可能不如单纯记忆训练有效,尽管不能排除训练时间不足以及训练的执行功能与工作记忆之间的关联性较低的影响;然而,它在非记忆结果方面具有更广泛的训练效果。