Yoshioka Kana, Miyauchi Akira, Fukushima Mitsuhiro, Kobayashi Kaoru, Kihara Minoru, Miya Akihiro
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Center for Excellence in Thyroid Care, Kuma Hospital, 8-2-35 Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0011, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Center for Excellence in Thyroid Care, Kuma Hospital, 8-2-35 Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0011, Japan.
World J Surg. 2016 Dec;40(12):2948-2955. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3634-7.
We reported phonatory recovery in the majority of 88 patients after recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) reconstruction. Here we analyzed factors that might influence the recovery, in a larger patient series.
At Kuma Hospital, 449 patients (354 females and 95 males) underwent RLN reconstruction with direct anastomosis, ansa cervicalis-to-RLN anastomosis, free nerve grafting, or vagus-to-RLN anastomosis; 47.4 % had vocal cord paralysis (VCP) preoperatively. Maximum phonation time (MPT) and mean airflow rate during phonation (MFR) were measured 1 year post surgery. Forty patients whose unilateral RLNs were resected and not reconstructed and 1257 normal subjects served as controls.
Compared to the VCP patients, the RLN reconstruction patients had significantly longer MPTs 1 year after surgery, nearing the normal values. The MFR results were similar but less clear. Detailed analyses of 228 female patients with reconstruction for whom data were available revealed that none of the following factors significantly affected phonatory recovery: age, preoperative VCP, method of reconstruction, site of distal anastomosis, use of magnifier, thickness of suture thread, and experience of surgeon. Of these 228 patients, 24 (10.5 %) had MPTs <9 s 1 year after surgery, indicating insufficient recovery in phonation. This insufficiency was also not associated with the factors mentioned above.
Approximately 90 % of patients who needed resection of the RLN achieved phonatory recovery following RLN reconstruction. The recovery was not associated with gender, age, preoperative VCP, surgical method of reconstruction, or experience of the surgeon. Performing reconstruction during thyroid surgery is essential whenever the RLN is resected.
我们报告了88例患者在喉返神经(RLN)重建术后多数患者发声功能得以恢复。在此,我们在更大的患者系列中分析了可能影响恢复的因素。
在熊本医院,449例患者(354例女性和95例男性)接受了RLN重建,采用直接吻合、颈袢-喉返神经吻合、游离神经移植或迷走神经-喉返神经吻合;47.4%的患者术前存在声带麻痹(VCP)。术后1年测量最大发声时间(MPT)和发声时的平均气流量(MFR)。40例单侧RLN被切除未重建的患者和1257例正常受试者作为对照。
与VCP患者相比,RLN重建患者术后1年的MPT显著延长,接近正常值。MFR结果相似但不太明显。对228例有可用数据的接受重建的女性患者进行的详细分析显示,以下因素均未显著影响发声恢复:年龄、术前VCP、重建方法、远端吻合部位、放大镜的使用、缝线厚度和外科医生的经验。在这228例患者中,24例(10.5%)术后1年MPT<9秒,表明发声恢复不足。这种不足也与上述因素无关。
约90%需要切除RLN的患者在RLN重建后实现了发声恢复。恢复与性别、年龄、术前VCP、重建手术方法或外科医生的经验无关。只要切除RLN,在甲状腺手术期间进行重建至关重要。