Suppr超能文献

预注册专业健康课程中的疼痛教育:一项范围综述方案

Pain education in pre-registration professional health courses: a protocol for a scoping review.

作者信息

Thompson Kate, Milligan James, Johnson Mark I, Briggs Michelle

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Centre for Pain Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 18;6(7):e012001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012001.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pain is a global health concern causing significant health and social problems with evidence that patients experiencing pain are receiving inadequate care. The content of pain education in pre-registration professional health courses is thought to be lacking both in the UK and internationally which is unacceptable considering the prevalence of pain. Evaluating the effect of education is complex in that the outcome (improved healthcare) is some distance from the educational approach. Best evidence medical education has been proposed as a continuum between 'opinion-based teaching' and 'evidence-based teaching'. Searching for evidence to inform best practice in health education is complex. A scoping review provides a practical and comprehensive strategy to locate and synthesise literature of varied methodology including reports from a variety of sources. The aim of this article is to describe a protocol for a scoping review that will locate, map and report research, guidelines and policies for pain education in pre-registration professional health courses. The extent, range and nature of reports will be examined, and where possible titles for potential systematic review will be identified.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Reports will be included for review that are directly relevant to the development of the pain curriculum in pre-registration professional health courses, eg nursing, medicine, physiotherapy. The search strategy will identify reports that include [pain] AND [pre-registration education or curriculum] AND [health professionals] in the title or abstract. Two authors will independently screen retrieved studies against eligibility criteria. A numerical analysis regarding the extent, nature and distribution of reports will be given along with a narrative synthesis to describe characteristics of relevant reports.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Formal ethical approval was not required to undertake this scoping review. Findings will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and via conference presentations.

摘要

引言

疼痛是一个全球性的健康问题,会引发重大的健康和社会问题,有证据表明疼痛患者未得到充分的护理。在英国和国际上,预注册专业健康课程中的疼痛教育内容被认为是缺乏的,考虑到疼痛的普遍性,这是不可接受的。评估教育效果很复杂,因为结果(改善医疗保健)与教育方法之间存在一定距离。最佳证据医学教育被提议作为“基于意见的教学”和“基于证据的教学”之间的一个连续体。寻找为健康教育最佳实践提供信息的证据很复杂。范围综述提供了一种实用且全面的策略,以查找和综合各种方法的文献,包括来自各种来源的报告。本文的目的是描述一个范围综述方案,该方案将查找、绘制并报告预注册专业健康课程中疼痛教育的研究、指南和政策。将检查报告的范围、广度和性质,并在可能的情况下确定潜在系统评价的标题。

方法与分析

将纳入与预注册专业健康课程(如护理、医学、物理治疗)中疼痛课程开发直接相关的报告进行综述。检索策略将识别标题或摘要中包含[疼痛] AND [预注册教育或课程] AND [卫生专业人员]的报告。两位作者将根据纳入标准独立筛选检索到的研究。将给出关于报告范围、性质和分布的数值分析以及描述相关报告特征的叙述性综合。

伦理与传播

进行这项范围综述无需正式的伦理批准。研究结果将发表在科学同行评审期刊上,并通过会议报告进行传播。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验